Advanced Deep Learning Methods to Generate and Discriminate Fake Images of Egyptian Monuments
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence technologies, particularly machine learning and computer vision, are being increasingly utilized to preserve, restore, and create immersive virtual experiences with cultural artifacts and sites, thus aiding in conserving cultural heritage and making it accessible to a global audience. This paper examines the performance of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), especially Style-Based Generator Architecture (StyleGAN), as a deep learning approach for producing realistic images of Egyptian monuments. We used Sigmoid loss for Language–Image Pre-training (SigLIP) as a unique image–text alignment system to guide monument generation through semantic elements. We also studied truncation methods to regulate the generated image noise and identify the most effective parameter settings based on architectural representation versus diverse output creation. An improved discriminator design that combined noise addition with squeeze-and-excitation blocks and a modified MinibatchStdLayer produced 27.5% better Fréchet Inception Distance performance than the original discriminator models. Moreover, differential evolution for latent-space optimization reduced alignment mistakes during specific monument construction tasks by about 15%. We checked a wide range of truncation values from 0.1 to 1.0 and found that somewhere between 0.4 and 0.7 was the best range because it allowed for good accuracy while retaining many different architectural elements. Our findings indicate that specific model optimization strategies produce superior outcomes by creating better-quality and historically correct representations of diverse Egyptian monuments. Thus, the developed technology may be instrumental in generating educational and archaeological visualization assets while adding virtual tourism capabilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Salem, A.E., Eissa, A.T., Hassan, T.H., and Saleh, M.I. (2025). Preserving the Past: A Dynamic Analysis of Heritage Tourism and Land Conservation in Mamluk Cairo. Heritage, 8.10.3390/heritage8010030 ↗
2. Hassan, M.A., Hamdy, A., and Nasr, M. (2023). Egypt Monuments Dataset Version 1: A scalable benchmark for image classification and monument recognition. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 14.10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140497 ↗
3. Gîrbacia, F. (2024). An Analysis of Research Trends for Using Artificial Intselligence in Cultural Heritage. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13183738 ↗
4. Hsieh, K., Tsaur, T.S.S., Chao, M., Li, I.C., Huang, P.C., and Lu, M.J. (2024, January 5–7). Cultural Heritage Meets AI: Advanced Text-to-Image Models for Digital Reconstruction and Preservation. Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Conference on Control and Robotics (ICCR), Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/ICCR64365.2024.10927586 ↗
5. Muradov, M., Gardyński, A., and Markiewicz, J. (2024). Integration of multi-temporal photogrammetric images in conservation work at the Royal Castle in Warsaw. J. Mod. Technol. Cult. Herit. Preserv., 3.10.69534/jmtchp/199600 ↗
6. A Review of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Its Applications in a Wide Variety of Disciplines: From Medical to Remote Sensing10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3346273 ↗
7. Lyu, P., Bai, X., Yao, C., Zhu, X., Huang, T., and Liu, G. (2017, January 9–15). Auto-Encoder Guided GAN for Chinese Calligraphy Synthesis. Proceedings of the 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICDAR.2017.181 ↗
8. New Technologies in the Preservation of Cultural Artifacts with Spatial, Temporal, Corporeal, Kinetic Dimensions: Artifacts in the Trinidad Carnival10.14434/sdh.v1i2.23277 ↗
9. Generative adversarial nets
10. Radford, A., Metz, L., and Chintala, S. (2015). Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv.
11. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks
12. Karras, T., Laine, S., and Aila, T. (2019, January 15–20). A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00453 ↗
13. Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., and Aila, T. (2020, January 13–19). Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00813 ↗
14. Karras, T., Aittala, M., Laine, S., Härkönen, E., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., and Aila, T. (2021, January 6–14). Alias-free generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Online.
15. Sabatelli, M., Kestemont, M., Daelemans, W., and Geurts, P. (2018, January 8–14). Deep Transfer Learning for Art Classification Problems. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2018 Workshops, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-11012-3_48 ↗
16. Practical Techniques for Restoration of Architectural Formation Elements in Historical Buildings10.4236/wjet.2019.71013 ↗
17. Ancient mural restoration based on a modified generative adversarial network10.1186/s40494-020-0355-x ↗
18. Hawkins, T., Cohen, J., and Debevec, P. (2001, January 28–30). A photometric approach to digitizing cultural artifacts. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage, Glyfada, Greece.10.1145/585051.585053 ↗
19. Grilli, E., and Remondino, F. (2020). Machine Learning Generalisation across Different 3D Architectural Heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9060379 ↗
20. Liu, Y., Pears, N., Rosin, P.L., and Huber, P. (2020). 3D Digitization of Cultural Heritage. 3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-44070-1 ↗
21. Digital Twin: A new perspective for cultural heritage management and fruition10.21014/acta_imeko.v11i1.1085 ↗
22. Zauner, C. (2010). Implementation and Benchmarking of Perceptual Image Hash Functions. [Master’s Thesis, University of Applied Sciences].