CLIP-BCA-Gated: A Dynamic Multimodal Framework for Real-Time Humanitarian Crisis Classification with Bi-Cross-Attention and Adaptive Gating
Source abstract
Abstract
During humanitarian crises, social media generates over 30 million multimodal tweets daily, but 20% textual noise, 40% cross-modal misalignment, and severe class imbalance (4.1% rare classes) hinder effective classification. This study presents CLIP-BCA-Gated, a dynamic multimodal framework that integrates bidirectional cross-attention (Bi-Cross-Attention) and adaptive gating within the CLIP architecture to address these challenges. The Bi-Cross-Attention module enables fine-grained cross-modal semantic alignment, while the adaptive gating mechanism dynamically weights modalities to suppress noise. Hierarchical learning rate scheduling and multidimensional data augmentation further optimize feature fusion for real-time multiclass classification. On the CrisisMMD benchmark, CLIP-BCA-Gated achieves 91.77% classification accuracy (1.55% higher than baseline CLIP and 2.33% over state-of-the-art ALIGN), with exceptional recall for critical categories: infrastructure damage (93.42%) and rescue efforts (92.15%). The model processes tweets at 0.083 s per instance, meeting real-time deployment requirements for emergency response systems. Ablation studies show Bi-Cross-Attention contributes 2.54% accuracy improvement, and adaptive gating contributes 1.12%. This work demonstrates that dynamic multimodal fusion enhances resilience to noisy social media data, directly supporting SDG 11 through scalable real-time disaster information triage. The framework’s noise-robust design and sub-second inference make it a practical solution for humanitarian organizations requiring rapid crisis categorization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Disaster Management and Resilience
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, China
Hebei Province University Smart Emergency Application Technology Research and Development Center, Beijing 101601, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Mandal, B., Khanal, S., and Caragea, D. (2024, January 13–17). Contrastive learning for multimodal classification of crisis related tweets. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, Singapore.10.1145/3589334.3648143 ↗
2. Alam, F., Ofli, F., and Imran, M. (2018, January 25–28). Crisismmd: Multimodal twitter datasets from natural disasters. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Palo Alto, CA, USA.10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14983 ↗
3. Disaster assessment from social media using multimodal deep learning10.1007/s11042-024-19818-0 ↗
4. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
5. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv.
6. Ofli, F., Alam, F., and Imran, M. (2020). Analysis of social media data using multimodal deep learning for disaster response. arXiv.
7. Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., and Clark, J. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. International Conference on Machine Learning, PmLR.
8. Bielawski, R., Devillers, B., Van De Cruys, T., and VanRullen, R. (2022, January 22–27). When does CLIP generalize better than unimodal models? When judging human-centric concepts. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Representation Learning (Repl4NLP 2022), Dublin, Ireland.10.18653/v1/2022.repl4nlp-1.4 ↗
9. Biamby, G., Luo, G., Darrell, T., and Rohrbach, A. (2021). Twitter-COMMs: Detecting climate, COVID, and military multimodal misinformation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.110 ↗
10. Sirbu, I., Sosea, T., Caragea, C., Caragea, D., and Rebedea, T. (2022, January 12–17). Multimodal semi-supervised learning for disaster tweet classification. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
11. Jia, C., Yang, Y., Xia, Y., Chen, Y.T., Parekh, Z., Pham, H., Le, Q., Sung, Y.H., Li, Z., and Duerig, T. (2021, January 18–24). Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Virtual Event.
12. Social media data analysis framework for disaster response10.1007/s44163-022-00026-4 ↗
13. Chaudhary, V., Goel, A., Yusuf, M.Z., and Tiwari, S. (2025, January 3–5). Disaster Tweets Classification Using Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Computing and Informatics, Kochi, Kerala, India.10.1007/978-981-96-1981-8_8 ↗
14. Alcántara, T., García-Vázquez, O., Calvo, H., and Torres-León, J.A. (2023, January 6–10). Disaster Tweets: Analysis from the Metaphor Perspective and Classification Using LLM’s. Proceedings of the Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Mérida, Mexico.10.1007/978-3-031-47640-2_9 ↗
15. Aamir, M., Ali, T., Irfan, M., Shaf, A., Azam, M.Z., Glowacz, A., Brumercik, F., Glowacz, W., Alqhtani, S., and Rahman, S. (2021). Natural disasters intensity analysis and classification based on multispectral images using multi-layered deep convolutional neural network. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21082648 ↗
16. Analysis of remote sensing imagery for disaster assessment using deep learning: A case study of flooding event10.1007/s00500-019-03878-8 ↗
17. Earthquake hazard and risk assessment using machine learning approaches at Palu, Indonesia10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141582 ↗
18. Automatic analysis of social media images to identify disaster type and infer appropriate emergency response10.1186/s40537-021-00471-5 ↗
19. Disaster image classification by fusing multimodal social media data
20. Parasher, S., Mittal, P.V., Karki, S., Narang, S., and Mittal, A. (2023). Natural Disaster Twitter Data Classification Using CNN and Logistic Regression. International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem-Solving, Springer Nature Singapore.10.1007/978-981-97-3292-0_46 ↗
21. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html.
22. Zhang, M., Huang, Q., and Liu, H. (2022). A multimodal data analysis approach to social media during natural disasters. Sustainability, 14.10.21203/rs.3.rs-1033015/v1 ↗
23. Using social media for sub-event detection during disasters10.1186/s40537-021-00467-1 ↗
24. Multimodal tweet classification in disaster response systems using transformer-based bidirectional attention model10.1007/s00521-022-07790-5 ↗
25. Zou, H.P., Caragea, C., Zhou, Y., and Caragea, D. (2023). Crisismatch: Semi-supervised few-shot learning for fine-grained disaster tweet classification. arXiv.
26. Teng, S., and Öhman, E. (2025, January 3–4). Using Multimodal Models for Informative Classification of Ambiguous Tweets in Crisis Response. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities, Albuquerque, NM, USA.10.18653/v1/2025.nlp4dh-1.23 ↗
27. Ochoa, K.S., and Comes, T. (2021). A Machine learning approach for rapid disaster response based on multi-modal data. The case of housing & shelter needs. arXiv.
28. Gite, S., Patil, S., Pradhan, B., Yadav, M., Basak, S., Rajendra, A., Alamri, A., Raykar, K., and Kotecha, K. (2025). Analysis of Multimodal Social Media Data Utilizing VIT Base 16 and GPT-2 for Disaster Response. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 1–19.10.1007/s13369-025-10314-7 ↗
29. Flamingo: A visual language model for few-shot learning
30. Li, J., Li, D., Savarese, S., and Hoi, S. (2023). BLIP-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR.
31. Peng, Z., Wang, W., Dong, L., Hao, Y., Huang, S., Ma, S., and Wei, F. (2023). Kosmos-2: Grounding multimodal large language models to the world. arXiv.
32. Tekumalla, R., and Banda, J.M. (2022, January 17–20). TweetDIS: A Large Twitter Dataset for Natural Disasters Built using Weak Supervision. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Osaka, Japan.10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020214 ↗
33. Gupta, K., Gautam, N., Sosea, T., Caragea, D., and Caragea, C. (2025, January 18–21). Calibrated Semi-Supervised Models for Disaster Response based on Training Dynamics. Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference, Halifax, NS, Canada.10.59297/5xkjq067 ↗
34. Yin, K., Liu, C., Mostafavi, A., and Hu, X. (2024). Crisissense-llm: Instruction fine-tuned large language model for multi-label social media text classification in disaster informatics. arXiv.
35. I-AID: Identifying actionable information from disaster-related tweets10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3107812 ↗
36. Hughes, A.L., and Clark, H. (2025, July 06). Seeing the Storm: Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Disaster Social Media Video Filtering. In Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2025. Available online: https://ojs.iscram.org/index.php/Proceedings/article/view/159.10.59297/f9bnkx60 ↗
37. Abavisani, M., Wu, L., Hu, S., Tetreault, J., and Jaimes, A. (2020, January 14–19). Multimodal categorization of crisis events in social media. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01469 ↗
38. Pranesh, R. (2022, January 12–17). Exploring multimodal features and fusion strategies for analyzing disaster tweets. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Noisy User-Generated Text (W-NUT 2022), Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
39. Crossmodal bipolar attention for multimodal classification on social media10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.140 ↗
40. Categorizing crises from social media feeds via multimodal channel attention10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294474 ↗