journal article·2025-07-25Open access

On the Development of a Neural Network Architecture for Magnetometer-Based UXO Classification

Piotr Ściegienka, Marcin Blachnik

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

The classification of Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) from magnetometer data is a critical but challenging task, frequently hindered by the data scarcity required for training robust machine learning models. To address this, we leverage a high-fidelity digital twin to generate a comprehensive dataset of magnetometer signals from both UXO and non-UXO objects, incorporating complex remanent magnetization effects. In this study, we design and evaluate a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for UXO classification and compare it against classical machine learning baseline, including Random Forest and kNN. Our CNN model achieves a balanced accuracy of 84.65%, significantly outperforming traditional models that exhibit performance collapse under slight distortions such as additive noise, drift, and time-wrapping. Additionally, we present a compact two-block CNN variant that retains competitive accuracy while reducing the number of learnable parameters by approximately 33%, making it suitable for real-time onboard classification in underwater vehicle missions. Through extensive ablation studies, we confirm that architectural components, such as residual skip connections and element-wise batch normalization, are crucial for achieving model stability and performance. The results also highlight the practical implications of underwater vehicles for survey design, emphasizing the need to mitigate signal drift and maintain constant survey speeds. This work not only provides a robust deep learning model for UXO classification, but also offers actionable suggestions for improving both model deployment and data acquisition protocols in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Joint Doctoral School, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

SR Robotics Sp. z o.o., Lwowska 38, 40-389 Katowice, Poland

Department of Industrial Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Funding

Silesian University of Technology · Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education · Polish National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR)

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Contaminated by war: A brief history of sea-dumping of munitions10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105189 ↗
2. McDonald, J.M., David, W., and Opitz, S.B. (2025, June 16). Use of Target Shape and Size in Classification of UXO in Survey Data—serdp-estcp.mil. Available online: https://serdp-estcp.mil/projects/details/7267ddaa-421f-4768-a590-89b8bca0b887.
3. Blachnik, M., Przyłucki, R., Golak, S., Ściegienka, P., and Wieczorek, T. (2023). On the development of a digital twin for underwater UXO detection using magnetometer-based data in application for the training set generation for machine learning models. Sensors, 23.10.20944/preprints202306.0218.v1 ↗
4. Shubitidze, F., and Barrowes, B. (2023, January 26–30). Enhanced EMI models for Underwater targets detection and classification. Proceedings of the 2023 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), Monterey/Seaside, CA, USA.10.23919/ACES57841.2023.10114760 ↗
5. Song, L.-P., Stephen, D., Billings, L.R.P., and Sinex, D. (2025, June 15). Electromagnetic Induction Sensing of Underwater Munitions: Detection and Classification with the UltraTEM system—Tech Articles, UXO Geophysics, Vol 28.1. Available online: https://fasttimesonline.co/electromagnetic-induction-sensing-of-underwater-munitions-detection-and-classification-with-the-ultratem-system/.
6. Kocak, D.M., Thayer, B., Stumvoll, H., Drakes, J., and Hessenius, C. (2024, January 23–26). Quantum Magnetometry for Enhanced Sensing in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2024, Halifax, NS, Canada.10.1109/OCEANS55160.2024.10753713 ↗
7. Underwater UXO detection using magnetometry on hovering AUVs10.1002/rob.22159 ↗
8. Inverse modelling and classification of magnetic responses to improve marine unexploded ordnance rationalization10.1093/gji/ggad490 ↗
9. Blachnik, M., Ściegienka, P., and Dąbrowski, D. (2023, January 22–24). Preliminary Study on Unexploded Ordnance Classification in Underwater Environment Based on the Raw Magnetometry Data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Évora, Portugal.10.1007/978-3-031-48232-8_40 ↗
10. Manimurugan, S., Karthikeyan, P., Narmatha, C., Aborokbah, M.M., Paul, A., Ganesan, S., Rajendran, T., and Ammad-Uddin, M. (2024). A hybrid Bi-LSTM and RBM approach for advanced underwater object detection. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0313708 ↗
11. Er, M., Jie, C., Zhang, Y., and Gao, W. (2022). Research Challenges, Recent Advances and Benchmark Datasets in Deep-Learning-Based Underwater Marine Object Detection: A Review. TechRxiv.10.36227/techrxiv.19350389.v3 ↗
12. Ściegienka, P., and Blachnik, M. (2024). On the Development of an Acoustic Image Dataset for Unexploded Ordnance Classification Using Front-Looking Sonar and Transfer Learning Methods. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24185946 ↗
13. Butler, D.K., Pasion, L., Billings, S.D., Oldenburg, D., and Yule, D.E. (2003, January 21–25). Enhanced discrimination capability for UXO geophysical surveys. Proceedings of the SPIE, Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets VIII, SPIE, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.486978 ↗
14. Zuo, B., Wang, L., and Chen, W. (2017). Full tensor eigenvector analysis on air-borne magnetic gradiometer data for the detection of dipole-like magnetic sources. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17091976 ↗
15. Wang, L., Zhang, S., Chen, S., and Luo, C. (2022). Fast Localization and Characterization of Underground Targets with a Towed Transient Electromagnetic Array System. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22041648 ↗
16. Using physics-based modeler outputs to train probabilistic neural networks for unexploded ordnance (UXO) classification in magnetometry surveys10.1109/36.917899 ↗
17. Billings, S. (2008). Data Modeling, Feature Extraction, and Classification of Magnetic and EMI Data, ESTCP Discrimination Study, Camp 650 Sibert, AL, U.S. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). Demonstration Report. Technical report, SKY RESEARCH ASHLAND OR.10.21236/ADA495600 ↗
18. Learning machine identification of ferromagnetic UXO using magnetometry10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2362920 ↗
19. Bijamov, A., Shubitidze, F., Fernandez, J.P., Shamatava, I., Barrowes, B.E., and O’Neill, K. (2011, January 25–29). Comparison of supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques for UXO classification using EMI data. Proceedings of the SPIE, Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XVI, SPIE, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.884076 ↗
20. Zeng, A., Chen, M., Zhang, L., and Xu, Q. (2023, January 8–10). Are transformers effective for time series forecasting?. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montréal, QC, Canada.
21. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
22. Bjorck, N., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2018). Understanding batch normalization. arXiv.
23. (2025, May 23). Time Series Augmentation Library. Available online: https://github.com/arundo/tsaug.
24. Fassbinder, J.W. (2017). Magnetometry for archaeology. Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology, Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4020-4409-0_169 ↗
25. Billings, S., Li, Y., and Goodrich, W. (2009). Advanced UXO discrimination using magnetometry—Understanding remanent magnetization: Final Report SERDP Project MM-1380. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, the U.S. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
26. Fluxgate three-component magnetometers for cost-effective ground, UAV and airborne magnetic surveys for industrial and academic geoscience applications and comparison with current industrial standards through case studies10.1016/j.gete.2019.03.002 ↗