journal article·2025-07-29Open access

How the Pandemic Changes the Factors Influencing Aircraft Utilization: The Case of Korea

Solsaem Choi, Se-Hwan Kim, Su-Hyun Lee, Wonho Suh, Sabeur Elkosantini, Seongkwan Mark Lee, Ki-Han Song

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

We investigate how the factors influencing aircraft utilization have changed during and post-Pandemic depending on the business model before. We classify the Pandemic into three periods (pre-, during and post- Pandemic) and the business models into three types (Total, FSC and LCC). For each group, we analyze the importance of factors using the SHAP and Random Forest models. Through group-difference tests on factor importance, we examine whether there are significant differences across the three periods and business models. According to the findings of the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and the Kruskal–Wallis assay, the importance of factors influencing aircraft utilization has changed across all business models over the three periods. Pre-Pandemic, a coincident index and a consumer price index were the principal factors. However, the exchange rate (KRW/EUR) gained significant importance during the Pandemic. This suggests that the Pandemic’s impact on the aviation industry was not limited to reduced demand but was also associated with changes in the importance of exchange rates and key business indicators for airline operations. Pre-Pandemic, there were significant differences among the business model groups. However, no meaningful differences were observed during and post-Pandemic. In other words, it seems that the leading indexes were closely interconnected pre-Pandemic, whereas lagging indexes and exchange rate became closely interconnected afterward. A group-difference test confirmed that no differences were observed among the business models, but differences were evident when considering the groups in their entirety. We presented the implications for changes in airline decision-making to understand changes in the aviation industry caused by the Pandemic, by identifying how the factors influencing aircraft utilization were altered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea

Innovation City Development Office, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong 30103, Republic of Korea

Department of Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA Campus, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea

Department of Economics and Management, University of Carthage, Sidi Bou Said, Av. de la République, Carthage 1054, Tunisia

School of Liberal Studies, Kunsan National University, Gunsan 54150, Republic of Korea

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Competitive effects of the airlines-within-airlines strategy–Pricing and route entry patterns10.1016/j.tre.2013.12.008 ↗
2. An optimization approach to airline integrated recovery10.1287/trsc.1120.0414 ↗
3. Hanlon, P. (2006). Global Airlines, Routledge.10.4324/9780080456102 ↗
4. Short-term forecasting for airline industry: The case of Indian air passenger and air cargo10.1177/0972150920923316 ↗
5. A service quality model of air travel demand: An empirical study10.1016/0191-2607(83)90007-9 ↗
6. Price elasticities of demand for passenger air travel: A meta-analysis10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00050-3 ↗
7. Yang, T., Liu, M., and Ye, Y. (2017, January 24–27). Empirical estimation of civil aviation demand elasticity: The case of China Mainland. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (IEIS), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/IEIS.2017.8078649 ↗
8. Business model management of low-cost: In a search for impact-factors of performance (case of AirAsia group airlines)
9. Sparse spatial autoregressions10.1016/S0167-7152(96)00140-X ↗
10. Komatsu, M., Takada, C., Neshi, C., Unoki, T., and Shikida, M. (2020, January 18–20). Feature extraction with SHAP value analysis for student per-formance evaluation in remote collaboration. Proceedings of the 2020 15th International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (iSAI-NLP), Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/iSAI-NLP51646.2020.9376830 ↗
11. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
12. COVID-19 and aviation, lessons learned from the trenches: A survey among participants at the 26th ATRS World Conference10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100005 ↗
13. Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework
14. Using machine learning techniques to assess the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global aviation industry
15. COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for recovery of the global aviation industry10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102022 ↗
16. A data-driven analysis of the aviation recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102401 ↗
17. COVID-19 and the tourism industry: An early stage sentiment analysis of the impact of social media and stakeholder communication
18. What can we learn from the JATM literature for the future of aviation post COVID-19?-A bibliometric and visualization analysis10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101916 ↗
19. Influence of COVID-19 on air travel-A scenario study toward future trusted aviation10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102325 ↗
20. Air transportation and COVID-19: A tale with three episodes
21. Airline competition in Indonesian domestic market: Airline-within-airline strategies and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.07.012 ↗
22. Airline strategies during the pandemic: What worked?10.1016/j.tra.2023.103625 ↗
23. Arrigo, U., Beccarello, M., and Di Foggia, G. (2023). Strategic Response of European Airlines to Market Dynamics: A Comparative Analysis. Adm. Sci., 13.10.3390/admsci13120255 ↗
24. Xuan, X., Khan, K., Su, C.W., and Khurshid, A. (2021). Will COVID-19 threaten the survival of the airline industry?. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132111666 ↗
25. Štimac, I., Vidović, A., Mihetec, T., and Drljača, M. (2020). Optimization of airport capacity efficiency by selecting optimal aircraft and airline business model. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12103988 ↗
26. Extended flexible capacity planning methodology with flight network contribution to the airline fleet assignment problem10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124541 ↗
27. Are on-time performance statistics worthless? An empirical study of the flight scheduling strategies of Brazilian airlines10.1016/j.tre.2020.102186 ↗
28. Critical limit assessment and optimization of airline fleet service strategy10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100052 ↗
29. Kızıloğlu, K., and Sakallı, Ü.S. (2023). Integrating Flight Scheduling, Fleet Assignment, and Aircraft Routing Problems with Codesharing Agreements under Stochastic Environment. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10121031 ↗
30. Gelhausen, M.C., Berster, P., and Wilken, D. (2021). Post-COVID-19 scenarios of global airline traffic until 2040 that reflect airport capacity constraints and mitigation strategies. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8100300 ↗
31. Song, K.H., Choi, S., Elkosantini, S., and Suh, W. (2023). Determining Factors Influencing Short-Term International Aviation Traffic Demand Using SHAP Analysis: Before COVID-19 and Now. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152014924 ↗
32. What determines travel time and distance decay in spatial interaction and accessibility?10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104061 ↗
33. Exploring interactive and nonlinear effects of key factors on intercity travel mode choice using XGBoost10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103264 ↗
34. Tourism demand forecasting with time series imaging: A deep learning model10.1016/j.annals.2021.103255 ↗
35. Using factor analyses to understand the post-pandemic travel behavior in domestic tourism through a questionnaire survey
36. Determinants of travel satisfaction for commercial airlines: A data mining approach10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108597 ↗
37. Bakır, M., Akan, Ş., Özdemir, E., Nguyen, P.H., Tsai, J.F., and Pham, H.A. (2022). How to achieve passenger satisfaction in the airport? Findings from regression analysis and necessary condition analysis approaches through online airport reviews. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042151 ↗
38. Ye, J., Gao, L., and Deng, J. (2024). Identifying the key factors of intermodal travel using interpretative ensemble learning. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol., in press.10.1016/j.ijtst.2024.09.004 ↗
39. An interpretable approach to passenger flow prediction and irregular passenger travel patterns understanding in metro system10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125991 ↗
40. Heterogeneity in route choice during peak hours: Implications on travel demand management10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100922 ↗
41. On Wilcoxon rank sum test for condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119209 ↗
42. An extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test for complex sample survey data10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01028.x ↗
43. Bridge, P.D. (1996). The Comparative Power of the Independent-Samples t-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test in Non-Normal Distributions of Real Data Sets in Education and Psychology. [Ph.D. Thesis, Wayne State University].
44. On the tractability of SHAP explanations10.1613/jair.1.13283 ↗
45. Lundberg, S. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv, arXiv:1705.07874.
46. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., and Liu, T.Y. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Paper.pdf.
48. Huang, N., Lu, G., and Xu, D. (2016). A permutation importance-based feature selection method for short-term electricity load forecasting using random forest. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9100767 ↗
49. Classification and regression by randomForest
50. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 ↗
51. Guide for the Interpretation of One-way Analysis of Variance10.1093/ptj/65.12.1888 ↗
52. ECB (2024, December 30). Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP). Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/implement/pepp/html/index.en.html.