journal article·2025-07-30Open access

Evaluation of Deviations Produced by Soft Tissue Fitting in Virtually Planned Orthognathic Surgery

Álvaro Pérez-Sala, Pablo Montes Fernández-Micheltorena, Miriam Bobadilla, Ricardo Fernández-Valadés Gámez, Javier Martínez Goñi, Ángela Villanueva, Iñigo Calvo Archanco, José Luis Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, José Luis Cebrián Carretero, Carlos Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio Navarro Cuellar, Gema Arenas, Ana López López, Ignacio M. Larrayoz, Rafael Peláez

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery (OS) is a complex procedure commonly used to treat dentofacial deformities (DFDs). These conditions, related to jaw position or size and often involving malocclusion, affect approximately 15% of the population. Due to the complexity of OS, accurate planning is essential. Digital assessment using computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) tools enhances surgical predictability. However, limitations in soft tissue simulation often require surgeon input to optimize aesthetic results and minimize surgical impact. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of virtual surgery planning (VSP) by analyzing the relationship between planning deviations and surgical satisfaction. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted on 16 patients who underwent OS at San Pedro University Hospital of La Rioja. VSP was based on CT scans using Dolphin Imaging software (v12.0, Patterson Dental, St. Paul, MN, USA) and surgeries were guided by VSP-designed occlusal splints. Outcomes were assessed using the Orthognathic Quality of Life (OQOL) questionnaire and deviations were measured through pre- and postoperative imaging. The results showed high satisfaction scores and good overall outcomes, despite moderate deviations from the virtual plan in many cases, particularly among Class II patients. A total of 63% of patients required VSP modifications due to poor soft tissue fitting, with 72% of these being Class II DFDs. Most deviations involved less maxillary advancement than planned, while maintaining optimal occlusion. This suggests that VSP may overestimate advancement needs, especially in Class II cases. No significant differences in satisfaction were observed between patients with low (<2 mm) and high (>2 mm) deviations. These findings support the use of VSP as a valuable planning tool for OS. However, surgeon experience remains essential, especially in managing soft tissue behavior. Improvements in soft tissue prediction are needed to enhance accuracy, particularly for Class II DFDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Anatomy and Medical Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bioengineering and 3D Printing Lab, Biomarkers and Molecular Signaling, Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, C/Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, Spain

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University Hospital San Pedro, C/Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, Spain

Biomarkers, Artificial Intelligence and Signaling (BIAS), Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, Duquesa de la Victoria 88, 26006 Logroño, Spain

Bioengineering Department, Geruza 3D Digital Solutions in Medicine, Plaza Juana García Orcoyen, 5, 31012 Pamplona, Spain

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University Hospital La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain

Funding

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) · Fundación Rioja Salud · European Social Fund (ESF) · Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) · Regional Government Innovation Engagements

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Quality of Life of Patients with Dentofacial Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.014 ↗
2. Miloro, M., and Markiewicz, M.R. (2019). Aesthetic Orthognathic Surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Techniques, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-41745-7.00022-9 ↗
3. Kim, S.B., Lee, J.W., Kim, S.Y., and Lee, D.W. (2013). Dental Informatics to Characterize Patients with Dentofacial Deformities. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0067862 ↗
4. Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Quality of Life in Patients with Dentofacial Deformities10.1155/2017/4103905 ↗
5. Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Quality of Life10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.006 ↗
6. Motivating Factors for Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery Evaluation10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.007 ↗
7. Quality of Life Assessment in Patients with Dentofacial Deformity Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery—A Systematic Review10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.023 ↗
8. Change in Quality of Life after Combined Orthodontic-Surgical Treatment of Dentofacial Deformities10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.019 ↗
9. Primary Maxillary Deficiency Dentofacial Deformities: Occlusion and Facial Esthetic Surgical Outcomes10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.022 ↗
10. Xia, F., and Sawan, M. (2021). Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051784 ↗
11. (2024, May 20). Obstructive Sleep Apnea-PubMed, Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29083619/.
12. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthognathic Surgery Patients10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.031 ↗
13. Orthognathic Surgery: General Considerations10.1055/s-0033-1357109 ↗
14. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.023 ↗
15. Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning of Orthognathic Surgery with Aid of CAD/CAM Fabricated Surgical Splint—A Novel 3D Analyzing Algorithm10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.016 ↗
16. Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Facial Asymmetry: Results of a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.010 ↗
17. Ho, C.T., Lin, H.H., Liou, E.J.W., and Lo, L.J. (2017). Three-Dimensional Surgical Simulation Improves the Planning for Correction of Facial Prognathism and Asymmetry: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. Sci. Rep., 7.10.1038/srep40423 ↗
18. Three-Dimensional Planning in Orthognathic Surgery Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Computer Software
19. Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning in Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery: Comparison of Planned and Actual Results10.1016/j.oooo.2016.03.004 ↗
20. Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011 ↗
21. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Simulation of the Soft Tissues of the Face in OrtogOnBlender for Correction of Class II Dentofacial Deformities: An Uncontrolled Experimental Case-Series Study10.1007/s10006-020-00920-0 ↗
22. Ying, X., Tian, K., Zhang, K., Ma, X., and Guo, H. (2021). Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning in Segmental Osteotomy in Combination with Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery with Surgery First Approach. BMC Oral Health, 21.10.1186/s12903-021-01892-7 ↗
23. Accuracy between Virtual Surgical Planning and Actual Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery by Iterative Closest Point Algorithm and Color Maps: A Retrospective Cohort Study
24. Awad, D., Reinert, S., and Kluba, S. (2022). Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Prediction Considering the Facial Aesthetic Units Using a Virtual Planning System in Orthognathic Surgery. J. Pers. Med., 12.10.3390/jpm12091379 ↗
25. Ruggiero, F., Borghi, A., Bevini, M., Badiali, G., Lunari, O., Dunaway, D., and Marchetti, C. (2023). Soft Tissue Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery: Improving Accuracy by Means of Anatomical Details. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0294640 ↗
26. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery: A Clinical Comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and Probabilistic Finite Element Modelling10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.008 ↗
27. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
28. Life-Quality of Orthognathic Surgery Patients: The Search for an Integral Diagnosis10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.123-137.sar ↗
29. Intraoral Scanning and Setting up the Digital Final Occlusion in Three-Dimensional Planning of Orthognathic Surgery: Its Comparison with the Dental Model Approach10.1097/PRS.0000000000005556 ↗
30. Accuracy of Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 ↗
31. Comparison of the Accuracy of Maxillary Position between Conventional Model Surgery and Virtual Surgical Planning10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.012 ↗
32. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Prediction in Orthognathic Cases Using Dolphin Three-Dimensional Software10.1097/SCS.0000000000005037 ↗
33. A Novel Incremental Simulation of Facial Changes Following Orthognathic Surgery Using FEM with Realistic Lip Sliding Effect10.1016/j.media.2021.102095 ↗
34. A Clinically Validated Prediction Method for Facial Soft-Tissue Changes Following Double-Jaw Surgery10.1002/mp.12391 ↗
35. Gutiérrez Venturini, A., Guiñales Díaz de Cevallos, J., Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, J.L., Alcañiz Aladrén, P., Illana Alejandro, C., and Cebrián Carretero, J.L. (2022). A Quantitative and Qualitative Clinical Validation of Soft Tissue Simulation for Orthognathic Surgery Planning. J. Pers. Med., 12.10.3390/jpm12091460 ↗
36. Changes in the Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Therapy—A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jcms.2023.10.004 ↗
37. A Longitudinal Study of Changes in Psychosocial Well-Being during Orthognathic Treatment10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.004 ↗
38. Changes in Quality of Life after Orthognathic Surgery in Saudi Patients10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.12.001 ↗
39. Ni, J., Song, S., and Zhou, N. (2019). Impact of Surgical Orthodontic Treatment on Quality of Life in Chinese Young Adults with Class III Malocclusion: A Longitudinal Study. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0782-9 ↗
40. Impact of Orthognathic Surgery on Quality of Life: A Comparison between Orthodontics-First and Surgery-First Approaches10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.005 ↗