C Band 360° Triangular Phase Shift Detector for Precise Vertical Landing RF System
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a novel design for precise vertical landing of drones based on the detection of three phase shifts in the range of ±180°. The design has three inputs to which the signal transmitted from an oscillator located at the landing point arrives with different delays. The circuit increases the aerial tracking volume relative to that achieved by detectors with theoretical unambiguous detection ranges of ±90°. The phase shift measurement circuit uses an analog phase detector (mixer), detecting a maximum range of ±90°and a double multiplication of the input signals, in phase and phase-shifted, without the need to fulfill the quadrature condition. The calibration procedure, phase detector curve modeling, and calculation of the input signal phase shift are significantly simplified by the use of an automatic gain control on each branch, dwhich keeps input amplitudes to the analog phase detectors constant. A simple program to determine phase shifts and guidance instructions is proposed, which could be integrated into the same flight control platform, thus avoiding the need to add additional processing components. A prototype has been manufactured in C band to explain the details of the procedure design. The circuit uses commercial circuits and microstrip technology, avoiding the crossing of lines by means of switches, which allows the design topology to be extrapolated to much higher frequencies. Calibration and measurements at 5.3 GHz show a dynamic range greater than 50 dB and a non-ambiguous detection range of ±180°. These specifications would allow one to track the drone during the landing maneuver in an inverted cone formed by a surface with an 11 m radius at 10 m high and the landing point, when 4 cm between RF inputs is considered. The errors of the phase shifts used in the landing maneuver are less than ±3°, which translates into 1.7% losses over the detector theoretical range in the worst case. The circuit has a frequency bandwidth of 4.8 GHz to 5.6 GHz, considering a 3 dB variation in the input power when the AGC is limiting the output signal to 0 dBm at the circuit reference point of each branch. In addition, the evolution of phases in the landing maneuver is shown by means of a small simulation program in which the drone trajectory is inside and outside the tracking range of ±180°.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Internet of Things and Social Network Interactions · Spacecraft Design and Technology · Satellite Communication Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Technologfical Development and Innovation in Communications (IDeTIC), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain
Funding
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovatio
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Woo, C., Kang, S., Ko, H., Song, H., and Kwon, J.O. (2017, January 8–10). Auto charging platform and algorithms for long-distance flight of drones. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
2. UAV Recharging Opportunities and Policies for Sensor Networks10.1155/2015/824260 ↗
3. Gautam, A., Sujit, P.B., and Saripalli, S. (2014, January 27–30). A survey of autonomous landing techniques for UAVs. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842377 ↗
4. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530 ↗
5. A Vision-Based Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Landing10.1007/s10846-018-0933-2 ↗
6. Pluckter, K., and Scherer, S. (2018). Precision UAV Landing in Unstructured Environments. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Springer.
7. Salagame, A., Govindraj, S., and Omkar, S. (2022). Precision Landing of a UAV on a Moving Platform for Outdoor Applications. arXiv.
8. Janousek, J., and Marcon, P. (2018, January 9–12). Precision landing options in unmanned aerial vehicles. Proceedings of the 2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW), Świnoujście, Poland.10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388325 ↗
9. Badakis, G., Koutsoubelias, M., and Lalis, S. (2021, January 23–25). Robust precision landing for autonomous drones combining vision-based and infrared sensors. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Sundsvall, Sweden.10.1109/SAS51076.2021.9530091 ↗
10. Mu, L., Li, Q., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Feng, N., Xue, X., and Sun, W. (2023). A vision-based autonomous landing guidance strategy for a micro-UAV by the modified camera view. Drones, 7.10.3390/drones7060400 ↗
11. Liu, X., Xue, W., Xu, X., Zhao, M., and Qin, B. (2024). Research on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) visual landing guidance and positioning algorithms. Drones, 8.10.3390/drones8060257 ↗
12. UAV landing platform recognition using cognitive computation combining geometric analysis and computer vision techniques10.1007/s12559-021-09962-2 ↗
13. Moreira, M., Azevedo, F., Ferreira, A., Pedro, D., Matos-Carvalho, J., Ramos, Á., Loureiro, R., and Campos, L. (2021). Precision Landing for Low-Maintenance Remote Operations with UAVs. Drones, 5.10.3390/drones5040103 ↗
14. Comparison of Global Navigation Satellite System Devices on Speed Tracking in Road (Tran)SPORT Applications10.3390/s141223490 ↗
15. Koo, G., Kim, K., Chung, J.Y., Choi, J., Kwon, N.Y., Kang, D.Y., and Sohn, H. (2017). Development of a high precision displacement measurement system by fusing a low cost RTK-GPS sensor and a force feedback accelerometer for infrastructure monitoring. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17122745 ↗
16. Study of Propagation Loss Prediction in Forest Environment10.2528/PIERB09071901 ↗
17. Mask Angle Effects on GNSS Speed Validity in Multipath and Tree Foliage Environments
18. Tiemann, J., Schweikowski, F., and Wietfeld, C. (2015, January 13–16). Design of an UWB indoor-positioning system for UAV navigation in GNSS-denied environments. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Banff, AB, Canada.10.1109/IPIN.2015.7346960 ↗
19. An IMU/UWB/vision-based extended kalman filter for mini-UAV localization in indoor environment using 802.15.4a wireless sensor network10.1007/s10846-012-9742-1 ↗
20. Queralta, J.P., Almansa, C.M., Schiano, F., Floreano, D., and Westerlund, T. (2020–24, January 24). UWB-based system for UAV localization in GNSS-denied environments: Characterization and dataset. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341042 ↗
21. A UAV localization system based on double UWB tags and IMU for landing platform10.1109/JSEN.2023.3260311 ↗
22. Ochoa-de Eribe-Landaberea, A., Zamora-Cadenas, L., Peñagaricano-Muñoa, O., and Velez, I. (2022). UWB and IMU-based UAV’s assistance system for autonomous landing on a platform. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22062347 ↗
23. Kownacki, C., Ambroziak, L., Ciezkowski, M., Wolniakowski, A., Romaniuk, S., Bozko, A., and Oldziej, D. (2023). Precision landing tests of tethered multicopter and VTOL UAV on moving landing pad on a lake. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23042016 ↗
24. Ultra-wideband-based localization for quadcopter navigation10.1142/S2301385016400033 ↗
25. Araña-Pulido, V., Jiménez-Yguácel, E., Cabrera-Almeida, F., and Quintana-Morales, P. (2021). Triangular Phase Shift Detector for Drone Precise Vertical Landing RF Systems. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 70.10.1109/TIM.2021.3063772 ↗
26. Lo, T.Y., Chang, J.Y., Wei, T.Z., Chen, P.Y., Huang, S.P., Tsai, W.T., Liou, C.Y., Lin, C.C., and Mao, S.G. (2024). GPS-free wireless precise positioning system for automatic flying and landing application of shipborne unmanned aerial vehicle. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24020550 ↗
27. Araña-Pulido, V., Jiménez-Yguácel, E., Cabrera-Almeida, F., and Quintana-Morales, P. (2022). Antenna system for trilateral drone precise vertical landing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 71.10.1109/TIM.2022.3196949 ↗
28. Sathaye, H., Schepers, D., Ranganathan, A., and Noubir, G. (2019, January 15–17). Wireless attacks on aircraft instrument landing systems. Proceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), Miami, FL, USA.
29. A low-power and high-frequency phase frequency detector for a 3.33-GHz delay locked loop10.1007/s00034-019-01232-9 ↗
30. Microsemi (2025, July 21). 8 GHz Phase Frequency Detector IC with Dual 40 GHz Prescalers. Available online: http://www.microsemi.com.
31. Low-power high-frequency phase frequency detector for minimal blind-zone phase-locked loops10.1007/s00034-018-0887-4 ↗
32. Zhang, M., Wang, H., Qin, H., Zhao, W., and Liu, Y. (2018). Phase Difference Measurement Method Based on Progressive Phase Shift. Electronics, 7.10.3390/electronics7060086 ↗
33. On the Accuracy of Digital Phase Sensitive Detectors Implemented in FPGA Technology10.1109/TIM.2014.2303257 ↗
34. A simple method to measure phase difference between sinusoidal signals10.1063/1.3498897 ↗
35. Han, J., and Ding, D. (2022). Design and Analysis of a Hybrid-Type RF MEMS Phase Detector in X-Band. Micromachines, 13.10.3390/mi13050786 ↗
36. Null Technique for Precision RF Phase Shift Measurements10.1109/TIM.2018.2888920 ↗
37. A simple and versatile phase detector for heterodyne interferometers10.1063/1.4975992 ↗
38. Verhaevert, J., and Van Torre, P. (2017, January 13–14). A low-cost vector network analyzer: Design and realization. Proceedings of the Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC 2017), Loughborough, UK.10.1049/cp.2017.0225 ↗
39. (2025, July 21). ADMV1014. 24 GHz to 44 GHzWideband Microwave Downconverter. Analog Devices 2018. Available online: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/admv1014.pdf.
40. Abbasi, M., Carpenter, S., Zirath, H., and Dielacher, F. (2014, January 19–23). A 80–95 GHz direct quadrature modulator in SiGe technology. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 14th Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/SiRF.2014.6828530 ↗
41. 360° phase detector cell for measurement systems based on switched dual multipliers10.1109/LMWC.2017.2690841 ↗
42. Pérez-Díaz, B., Araña-Pulido, V., Cabrera-Almeida, F., and Dorta-Naranjo, B.P. (2021). Phase shift and amplitude array measurement system based on 360° switched dual multiplier phase detector. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 70.10.1109/TIM.2021.3120132 ↗
43. Dorta-Naranjo, B.P., Araña-Pulido, V., Cabrera-Almeida, F., and Jiménez-Yguácel, E. (2025). A 2–18 GHz 360° Phase Detector based on Switched Dual Multipliers and Fixed Delay Lines. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 74.10.1109/TIM.2024.3522336 ↗
44. (2025, July 21). MA4EX600L. Silicon Double Balanced HMICTM Mixer 4.2–6.0 GHz. Macom 2023. Available online: https://cdn.macom.com/datasheets/MA4EX600L1-1225.pdf.
45. (2025, July 21). ADL5906. 10 MHz to 10 GHz 67 dB TruPwr Detector. Analog Devices 2023. Available online: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/adl5906.pdf.
46. Experimental Characterization of Oscillator Circuits for Reduced-Order Models10.1109/TMTT.2012.2214054 ↗
47. Höflinger, F., Müller, J., Törk, M., Reindl, L., and Burgard, W. (2012, January 13–16). A wireless micro inertial measurement unit (IMU). Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, Graz, Austria.10.1109/I2MTC.2012.6229271 ↗
48. García, J., Molina, J.M., Trincado, J., and Sánchez, J. (2017, January 10–12). Analysis of sensor data and estimation output with configurable UAV platforms. Proceedings of the Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF), Bonn, Germany.10.1109/SDF.2017.8126383 ↗
49. Three-channel phase meters based on the AD8302 and field programmable gate arrays for heterodyne millimeter wave interferometer10.1615/TelecomRadEng.v75.i11.50 ↗
50. Philippe, B., and Reynaert, P. (2018, January 3–6). A Quadrature Phase Detector in 28nm CMOS for Differential mm-Wave Sensing Applications Using Dielectric Waveguides. Proceedings of the IEEE 44th European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC) (ESSCIRC), Dresden, Germany.10.1109/ESSCIRC.2018.8494306 ↗