A Vulnerability Index for Multimodal Transportation Networks: The Case of Korea
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the vulnerability of transportation networks and identify critical nodes and regions within a multimodal transportation system. While previous research has predominantly focused on centrality measures to evaluate node importance from an accessibility perspective, this study emphasizes the need to evaluate network vulnerability comprehensively in response to rapid socioeconomic changes. We propose a vulnerability function that integrates network topology and connectivity. First, we defined the vulnerability of individual nodes and regional clusters. Second, we developed a methodology to evaluate the defined vulnerabilities systematically. Finally, we applied the framework to Korea’s multimodal transportation network, conducting a case study to validate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed function. Conclusively, this study presents a comprehensive vulnerability assessment framework for multimodal transportation networks, offering valuable insights to support robust decision making for enhancing sustainable and efficient transportation systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Technology and Data Analysis · Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
Department of Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA Campus, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Freight transportation demand elasticities: A geographic multimodal transportation network analysis10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00022-3 ↗
2. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks10.1002/atr.5670330207 ↗
3. Transportation on demand
4. A review of urban transportation network design problems10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.001 ↗
5. A framework for evaluating the role of electric vehicles in transportation network infrastructure under travel demand variability10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.031 ↗
6. Geography, transportation, and regional development10.2307/142944 ↗
7. Kansky, K.J. (1963). Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago].
8. Transportation: Benign Influence or an Antidote to Regional Inequality?10.1111/j.1435-5597.1989.tb01171.x ↗
9. Hoyle, B.S. (1973). Transport and Development, Springer.10.1007/978-1-349-15506-4 ↗
10. Rietveld, P., and Nijkamp, P. (1992). Transport and Regional Development, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Serie Research Memoranda, No. 1992-50.
11. Taylor, M.A., and D’Este, G.M. (2007). Transport network vulnerability: A method for diagnosis of critical locations in transport infrastructure systems. Critical Infrastructure: Reliability and Vulnerability, Springer.
12. Vulnerability to environmental hazards10.1177/030913259602000407 ↗
13. Revisiting the concept of ‘vulnerability’10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00465-7 ↗
14. Vulnerability10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 ↗
15. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks10.1007/s11067-006-9012-5 ↗
16. Dinh, T.N., Xuan, Y., Thai, M.T., Park, E., and Znati, T. (2010, January 14–19). On approximation of new optimization methods for assessing network vulnerability. Proceedings of the 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5462098 ↗
17. An overview of network vulnerability modeling approaches10.1007/s10708-011-9412-z ↗
18. An assessment method for highway network vulnerability10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.017 ↗
19. Road Repair Delay Costs in Improving the Road Rehabilitation Strategy through a Comprehensive Road User Cost Model10.46604/ijeti.2024.13334 ↗
20. Holme, P., Kim, B.J., Yoon, C.N., and Han, S.K. (2002). Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Phys. Rev. E, 65.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056109 ↗
21. Nicholson, A., and Dalziell, E. (2003). Risk evaluation and management: A road network reliability study. The Network Reliability of Transport: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/9781786359544-003 ↗
22. Cooperative Operation for Multiagent Energy Systems Integrated with Wind, Hydrogen, and Buildings: An Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Approach10.1109/TII.2025.3563589 ↗
23. Ritchey, R.W., and Ammann, P. (2000, January 14–17). Using model checking to analyze network vulnerabilities. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000, Berkeley, CA, USA.
24. Liu, Y., and Man, H. (2005, January 28–29). Network vulnerability assessment using Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Data Mining, Intrusion Detection, Information Assurance, and Data Networks Security 2005, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.604240 ↗
25. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.003 ↗
26. Network structure and travel patterns: Explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.06.002 ↗
27. Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.003 ↗
28. Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems—A discussion of recent research10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002 ↗
29. Li, Z., Sun, H., Xue, Y., Li, Z., Jin, X., and Wang, P. (2025). Resilience-Oriented Asynchronous Decentralized Restoration Considering Building and E-Bus Co-Response in Electricity-Transportation Networks. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif.10.1109/TTE.2025.3581349 ↗
30. Attacker–Defender models and road network vulnerability10.1098/rsta.2008.0019 ↗
31. Taylor, M. (2017). Vulnerability Analysis for Transportation Networks, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-811010-2.00003-4 ↗
32. Phillips, C., and Swiler, L.P. (1998, January 22–25). A graph-based system for network-vulnerability analysis. Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, Charlottsville, VA, USA.10.1145/310889.310919 ↗
33. Ammann, P., Wijesekera, D., and Kaushik, S. (2002, January 18–22). Scalable, graph-based network vulnerability analysis. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/586139.586140 ↗
34. Vulnerability and power on networks10.1017/nws.2015.8 ↗
35. Is the Boston subway a small-world network?10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01089-0 ↗
36. Efficacy of local attack strategies on the Beijing road complex weighted network10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.127 ↗
37. A graph theoretic approach to power system vulnerability identification10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3010476 ↗
38. Zhuang, Y., Liu, Z., Qian, P., Liu, Q., Wang, X., and He, Q. (2021, January 7–15). Smart contract vulnerability detection using graph neural networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Yokohama, Japan.10.24963/ijcai.2020/454 ↗
39. Liu, Z., Qian, P., Wang, X., Zhu, L., He, Q., and Ji, S. (2021). Smart contract vulnerability detection: From pure neural network to interpretable graph feature and expert pattern fusion. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2021/379 ↗