journal article·2025-07-22Open access

Dual Production of Full-Fat Soy and Expanded Soybean Cake from Non-GMO Soybeans: Agronomic and Nutritional Insights Under Semi-Organic Cultivation

Krystian Ambroziak, Anna Wenda-Piesik

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

The diversification of plant protein sources is a strategic priority for European food systems, particularly under the EU Green Deal and Farm to Fork strategies. In this study, dual production of full-fat soy (FFS) and expanded soybean cake (ESC) was evaluated using non-GMO soybeans cultivated under semi-organic conditions in Central Poland. Two agronomic systems—post-emergence mechanical weeding with rotary harrow weed control (P1) and conventional herbicide-based control (P2)—were compared over a four-year period. The P1 system produced consistently higher yields (e.g., 35.6 dt/ha in 2024 vs. 33.4 dt/ha in P2) and larger seed size (TSW: up to 223 g). Barothermal and press-assisted processing yielded FFS with protein content of 32.4–34.5% and oil content of 20.8–22.4%, while ESC exhibited enhanced characteristics: higher protein (37.4–39.0%), lower oil (11.6–13.3%), and elevated dietary fiber (15.8–16.3%). ESC also showed reduced anti-nutritional factors (e.g., trypsin inhibitors and phytic acid) and remained microbiologically and oxidatively stable over six months. The semi-organic P1 system offers a scalable, low-input approach to local soy production, while the dual-product model supports circular, zero-waste protein systems aligned with EU sustainability targets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agronomics and Food Processing, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Rotundo, J.L., Marshall, R., McCormick, R., Truong, S.K., Styles, D., Gerde, J.A., Gonzalez-Escobar, E., Carmo-Silva, E., Janes-Bassett, V., and Logue, J. (2024). European Soybean to Benefit People and the Environment. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-57522-z ↗
2. (2025, May 25). Feed Protein: Overview of EU Production and Options to Diversify Sources. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/media/news/feed-protein-overview-eu-production-and-options-diversify-sources-2024-05-24_en?prefLang=pl&etrans=pl.
3. Could Domestic Soybean Production Avoid Europe’s Protein Imports in 2050?10.1051/ocl/2022031 ↗
4. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union, Areté, S&P Global Commodity Insights, and Natural Resources Institute Finland (2024). The Dependency of the EU’s Food System on Inputs and Their Sources, Publications Office.
5. Vugt, T., and Nadeu, E. (2025, July 09). European Protein Diversification: Growing Opportunities for Farmers. Available online: https://ieep.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/European-Protein-Diversification-Growing-opportunities-for-farmers-IEEP-2025.pdf.
6. Ohyama, T., Takahashi, Y., Ohtake, N., Sato, T., and Tanabata, S. (2022). Soybean and Sustainable Agriculture for Food Security. Soybean—Recent Advances in Research and Applications, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.98162 ↗
7. Europe’s Farm to Fork Strategy and Its Commitment to Biotechnology and Organic Farming: Conflicting or Complementary Goals?10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.012 ↗
8. Agro-Economic Prospects for Expanding Soybean Production beyond Its Current Northerly Limit in Europe10.1016/j.eja.2021.126415 ↗
9. Organic Soybean Production in Switzerland10.1051/ocl/2020059 ↗
10. Tataridas, A., Kanatas, P., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Zannopoulos, S., and Travlos, I. (2022). Sustainable Crop and Weed Management in the Era of the EU Green Deal: A Survival Guide. Agronomy, 12.10.3390/agronomy12030589 ↗
11. Winkler, J., Dvořák, J., Hosa, J., Martínez Barroso, P., and Vaverková, M.D. (2022). Impact of Conservation Tillage Technologies on the Biological Relevance of Weeds. Land, 12.10.3390/land12010121 ↗
12. (2023). Weed Management Alternatives to the Use of Glyphosate, Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe). [3rd ed.]. Available online: https://www.pan-europe.info/resources/reports/2023/03/weed-management-alternatives-use-glyphosate.
13. Sims, B., Corsi, S., Gbehounou, G., Kienzle, J., Taguchi, M., and Friedrich, T. (2018). Sustainable Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers. Agriculture, 8.10.3390/agriculture8080118 ↗
14. (2017). Animal Feeding Stuffs—Guidelines for the Application of near Infrared Spectrometry (NIR) (Standard No. PN-EN ISO 12099:2017).
15. Ambroziak, K., and Wenda-Piesik, A. (2025). Comparative Characterization of Hemp Seed Cakes from Dehulled and Hulled Cannabis sativa, L. Var. Oleifera Cv. ‘Henola’: Nutritional, Functional, and Storage Stability Insights. Foods, 14.10.3390/foods14091605 ↗
16. Toleikiene, M., Slepetys, J., Sarunaite, L., Lazauskas, S., Deveikyte, I., and Kadziuliene, Z. (2021). Soybean Development and Productivity in Response to Organic Management above the Northern Boundary of Soybean Distribution in Europe. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11020214 ↗
17. Distinct Responses of Soil Microbial Communities to Elevated CO2 and O3 in a Soybean Agro-Ecosystem10.1038/ismej.2013.177 ↗
18. Response of Rhizobium to Environmental Stress
19. Effects of Low Temperature and Shading during Flowering on the Yield Components in Soybeans10.1626/pps.6.17 ↗
20. Understanding and Modeling the Effect of Temperature and Daylength on Soybean Phenology under High-Yield Conditions10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.011 ↗
21. Soybean-BioCro: A Semi-Mechanistic Model of Soybean Growth10.1093/insilicoplants/diab032 ↗
22. Sun, T., Cui, L., Zong, L., Zhang, S., Jiao, Y., Xue, X., and Jin, Y. (2024). Weed Recognition at Soybean Seedling Stage Based on YOLOV8nGP + NExG Algorithm. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14040657 ↗
23. Wenda-Piesik, A., and Ambroziak, K. (2022). The Choice of Soybean Cultivar Alters the Underyielding of Protein and Oil under Drought Conditions in Central Poland. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157830 ↗
24. Agronomic and Physiological Contributions to the Yield Improvement of Soybean Cultivars Released from 1950 to 2006 in Northeast China10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.016 ↗
25. Soybean Test Weight in Relation to Genotype, Environment, and Genotype × Environment Interaction in the Southern United States10.1002/agj2.21551 ↗
26. FAO, and WHO (2023). Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual.
27. Composition, Properties and Health Benefits of Indigestible Carbohydrate Polymers as Dietary Fiber: A Review10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.044 ↗
28. Dietary Fibres in the Regulation of Appetite and Food Intake. Importance of Viscosity10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.147 ↗
29. Fiber and Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Health Benefits10.3390/nu5041417 ↗
30. Health Benefits of Dietary Fiber10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00189.x ↗
31. Plant Sterols Alter Bile Acid Metabolism and Reduce Cholesterol Absorption in Hamsters Fed a Beef-Based Diet10.1016/S0271-5317(02)00389-5 ↗
32. Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00616.x ↗
33. Review: Dietary Fiber Utilization and Its Effects on Physiological Functions and Gut Health of Swine10.1017/S1751731115000919 ↗
34. Szulc, J., Błaszak, B., Wenda-Piesik, A., Gozdecka, G., Żary-Sikorska, E., Bąk, M., and Bauza-Kaszewska, J. (2023). Zero Waste Technology of Soybeans Processing. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152014873 ↗
35. Linking Production, Processing, and Consumption of Plant-Based Protein Alternatives in Europe10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102940 ↗
36. Hou, L., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Gao, R., Zhou, X., Yang, S., Luo, X., Jiang, Z., and Liu, Z. (2025). Effects of Biochar on Soil Quality in a Maize Soybean Rotation on Mollisols. Agronomy, 15.10.3390/agronomy15051226 ↗
37. Root to Shoot and Carbon to Nitrogen Ratios of Maize and Soybean Crops in the US Midwest10.1016/j.eja.2020.126130 ↗
38. A Platform for Soybean Molecular Breeding: The Utilization of Core Collections for Food Security10.1007/s11103-013-0076-6 ↗
39. Variations in Soybean Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Quality Based on Location and Planting Dates10.1111/ijfs.17241 ↗
40. Jeon, Y.-H., Gu, B.-J., and Ryu, G.-H. (2023). Investigating the Potential of Full-Fat Soy as an Alternative Ingredient in the Manufacture of Low- and High-Moisture Meat Analogs. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12051011 ↗
41. Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Factors in Soybean
42. Rebello, C.J., Boué, S., Levy, R.J., Puyau, R., Beyl, R.A., Greenway, F.L., Heiman, M.L., Keller, J.N., Reynolds, C.F., and Kirwan, J.P. (2023). Safety and Tolerability of Whole Soybean Products: A Dose-Escalating Clinical Trial in Older Adults with Obesity. Nutrients, 15.10.3390/nu15081920 ↗
43. Effects of Raw and Roasted High Oleic Soybeans on Milk Production of High-Producing Dairy Cows10.3168/jds.2024-25092 ↗
44. Staniak, M., Świątkiewicz, M., Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa-Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, and Instytut Zootechniki (2024). Soja w Uprawie i Żywieniu Zwierząt, Dział Upowszechniania i Wydawnictw IUNG-PIB w Puławach. Instrukcja Upowszechnieniowa/[Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa].
45. FAO (2025, May 30). Fats and Fatty Acids in Human Nutrition: Report of an Expert Consultation (Food and Nutrition Paper No. 91). Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/nutrition/docs/requirements/fatsandfattacidsreport.pdf.
46. Dietary Intake of Stearidonic Acid–Enriched Soybean Oil Increases the Omega-3 Index: Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study of Efficacy and Safety10.3945/ajcn.2009.29072 ↗
47. Fortification of Foods with Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids10.1080/10408398.2011.578221 ↗
48. Kondratowicz-Pietruszka, E., and Ostasz, L. (2010). Dynamics of Oxidation of Heated Vegetable Oils, Cracow University of Economics.
49. A Review on Plant-Based Proteins from Soybean: Health Benefits and Soy Product Development
50. Detection and Characterization of the Soybean Allergen Gly m 7 in Soybeans and Processed Soybean Foods10.3390/allergies1040022 ↗
51. Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality10.1017/S0007114512002371 ↗
52. Making Sense of the “Clean Label” Trends: A Review of Consumer Food Choice Behavior and Discussion of Industry Implications10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022 ↗
53. Caporgno, M.P., and Mathys, A. (2018). Trends in Microalgae Incorporation Into Innovative Food Products with Potential Health Benefits. Front. Nutr., 5.10.3389/fnut.2018.00058 ↗
54. Effects of Extrusion Conditions on the Morphological, Functional, and Sensory Properties of Soy Press Cake Extrudates10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32614 ↗
55. Świątkiewicz, M., Szczepanik, K., Gala, Ł., Grela, E.R., Witaszek, K., Barszcz, M., Tuśnio, A., and Taciak, M. (2024). Determination of the Impact of Extruded Soybean Press Cake on Rearing and Health Indices of Piglets. Agriculture, 14.10.3390/agriculture14111899 ↗
56. Gut Microbiota and Blood Metabolites Related to Fiber Intake and Type 2 Diabetes10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.323634 ↗
57. Zhang, H. (2023). Effects of Soybean–Corn Rotation on Crop Yield, Economic Benefits, and Water Productivity in the Corn Belt of Northeast China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151411362 ↗