journal article·2025-07-22Open access

Shear Bond Strength and Finite Element Stress Analysis of Composite Repair Using Various Adhesive Strategies With and Without Silane Application

Elif Ercan Devrimci, Hande Kemaloglu, Cem Peskersoy, Tijen Pamir, Murat Turkun

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of various adhesive systems, particularly silane application, on the repair bond strength of a nanofill resin composite and associated stress distribution using finite element analysis (FEA). A total of 105 composite specimens (4 × 6 mm) were aged by thermal cycling (10,000 cycles), roughened, etched with phosphoric acid, and assigned to seven groups (n = 15): G1. control—no adhesive; G2. Single Bond Universal Adhesive; G3. composite primer; G4. PQ1; G5. Silane + PQ1; G6. Clearfil Universal Bond; G7. All-Bond Universal. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min), and failure modes were microscopically classified. FEA was conducted under static and fatigue conditions using 3D models built in Fusion-360. Mechanical properties were obtained from technical data and the literature. A 300 N load was applied and contact detection (0.05 mm) and constraint zones were defined. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (p = 0.05). Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between bond strength and von Mises stress. The highest bond strength was found in G2 (21.54 MPa) while G1 showed the lowest (8.86 MPa). Silane-treated groups exhibited favorable stress distribution and a strong correlation between experimental and simulated outcomes. Silane applications significantly enhance composite repair performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir 35030, Turkey

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. FDI World Dental Federation: Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8 ↗
2. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262 ↗
3. Teaching composite restoration repair: Trends and quality of teaching over the past 20 years10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103303 ↗
4. Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite
5. Bond durability of a repaired resin composite using universal adhesive and different surface treatments
6. Michelotti, G., Niedzwiecki, M., Bidjan, D., Dieckmann, P., Deari, S., Attin, T., and Tauböck, T.T. (2020). Silane effect of universal adhesive on the composite-composite repair bond strength after different surface pretreatments. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12040950 ↗
7. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology
8. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012 ↗
9. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012 ↗
10. Carrilho, E., Cardoso, M., Marques Ferreira, M., Marto, C.M., Paula, A., and Coelho, A.S. (2019). 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability—A systematic review. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12050790 ↗
11. Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.95 ↗
12. Efficacy of prostheses bonding using silane incorporated to universal adhesives or applied separately: A systematic review10.4103/jips.jips_144_18 ↗
13. Is simulation of glued contact sufficient to simulate nonlinear failure behaviour in dental shear bond strength tests?10.1016/j.identj.2025.03.007 ↗
14. Comparative evaluation of 3 microbond strength tests using 4 adhesive systems: Mechanical, finite element, and failure analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.024 ↗
15. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites10.2341/10-386-L ↗
16. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007 ↗
17. Which surface treatment promotes higher bond strength for the repair of resin nanoceramics and polymer-infiltrated ceramics? A systematic review and meta-analyses10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.009 ↗
18. The effect of silane-containing universal adhesives on the immediate and delayed bond strength of repaired composite restorations10.4103/1735-3327.328755 ↗
19. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty-four hours10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.008 ↗
20. Repair potential of a bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different surface-treatment protocols10.1111/eos.12814 ↗
21. In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12 ↗
22. Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs10.2341/16-259-L ↗
23. A randomized controlled study on the effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the immediate repair bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface10.1016/j.jdent.2019.04.012 ↗
24. Fracture resistance of zirconia-composite veneered crowns in comparison with zirconia-porcelain crowns10.4012/dmj.2016-298 ↗
25. Mechanical and leakage behaviour of the dentin--adhesive interface10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021125.40282.ba ↗
26. An experimental and theoretical composite model of the human mandible10.1007/s10856-005-4728-1 ↗
27. Influence of core build-up designs on preventing early failure of composite resin core in molars under traction forces: A finite element analysis study
28. Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.007 ↗
29. Repairability of aged dimethacrylate-free ORMOCER-based dental composite resins with different surface roughening methods and intermediate materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.001 ↗
30. Călinoiu, Ș.G., Bîcleșanu, C., Florescu, A., Stoia, D.I., Dumitru, C., and Miculescu, M. (2023). Comparative study on interface fracture of 4th generation 3-steps adhesive and 7th generation universal adhesive. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16175834 ↗
31. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis10.4012/dmj.2015-204 ↗
32. Viscoelastic properties of low-shrinking composite resins compared to packable composite resins10.4012/dmj.2010-181 ↗
33. Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite10.2147/CCIDE.S53461 ↗
34. Effect of water aging of adherend composite on repair bond strength of nanofilled composites
35. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015 ↗
36. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite
37. The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20 ↗
38. The repair bond strength to resin matrix in cured resin composites after water aging10.4012/dmj.2018-044 ↗
39. Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens
40. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013 ↗
41. Influence of specimens’ geometry and materials on the thermal stresses in dental restorative materials during thermal cycling10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.017 ↗
42. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites
43. Composite repair: On the fatigue strength of universal adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.003 ↗
44. Bond strength of composite resin restoration repair: Influence of silane and adhesive systems10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2632 ↗
45. Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0045 ↗
46. Is the presence of 10-MDP associated with higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.014 ↗
47. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00833.x ↗
48. Repair of dental resin-based composites10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4 ↗
49. Is the repair bond strength affected when substrate and repair composite are not of the same kind? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1080/01694243.2024.2325224 ↗
50. Bourgi, R., Etienne, O., Holiel, A.A., Cuevas-Suárez, C.E., Hardan, L., Roman, T., Flores-Ledesma, A., Qaddomi, M., Haikel, Y., and Kharouf, N. (2025). Effectiveness of surface treatments on the bond strength to 3D-printed resins: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prosthesis, 7.10.3390/prosthesis7030056 ↗
51. Effect of adhesive application method on repair bond strength of composite10.5395/rde.2021.46.e32 ↗
52. Reliability of an innovative slab shear versus microtensile bond strength test: Mechanical and finite element analysis10.1055/s-0043-1763498 ↗
53. Effect of aging and different surface treatments on repair bond strength of hybrid resin composites10.2174/0118742106263441231012112236 ↗
54. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive
55. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.002 ↗