journal article·2025-07-09Open access

Bio-Agronomic Assessment and Quality Evaluation of Sugarcane with Optimized Juice Fermentation in View of Producing Sicilian “Rum Agricole”

Antonino Pirrone, Nicolò Iacuzzi, Antonio Alfonzo, Morgana Monte, Vincenzo Naselli, Federica Alaimo, Noemi Tortorici, Gabriele Busetta, Giuliana Garofalo, Raimondo Gaglio, Claudio De Pasquale, Nicola Francesca, Luca Settanni, Teresa Tuttolomondo, Giancarlo Moschetti

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. L.), traditionally cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions, is being explored for its agronomic viability in Mediterranean climates. This study assessed the bio-agronomic performance of seven sugarcane varieties and two accessions grown in Sicily, to enhance the fermentation process to produce rum agricole, a spirit derived from fresh cane juice. Agronomic evaluations revealed significant varietal differences, with juice yields of 5850−14,312 L ha−1 and sugar yields of 1.84–5.33 t ha−1. Microbial control was achieved through the addition of lactic acid, which effectively suppressed undesirable bacterial growth and improved fermentation quality. Furthermore, the application of two selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (MN113 and SPF21), isolated from high-sugar matrices such as manna and honey byproducts, affected the production of volatile compounds, particularly esters and higher alcohols. Sensory analysis confirmed a more complex aromatic profile in cane wines fermented with these selected yeasts, with overall acceptance scores reaching 7.5. Up to 29 aroma-active compounds were identified, including ethyl esters and higher alcohols. This research represents the first integrated approach combining lactic acid treatment and novel yeast strains for the fermentation of sugarcane juice in a Mediterranean context. The findings highlight the potential for high-quality rum agricole production in Sicily.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing · Natural Products and Biological Research · Fermentation and Sensory Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Funding

FLINA SRL

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. (2024, September 09). FAOSTAT Crops and Livestock Products. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
2. Socio-economic impacts of Brazilian sugarcane industry10.1016/j.envdev.2015.06.010 ↗
3. Sugarcane agriculture and sugar industry in China10.1007/s12355-014-0342-1 ↗
4. Climate change and sugarcane production: Potential impact and mitigation strategies10.1155/2015/547386 ↗
5. Sugarcane leaf area index modeling under different soil water conditions10.1590/S0103-90161997000300008 ↗
6. Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age10.1590/S0103-90162013000600011 ↗
7. Som-Ard, J., Atzberger, C., Izquierdo-Verdiguier, E., Vuolo, F., and Immitzer, M. (2021). Remote sensing applications in sugarcane cultivation: A review. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13204040 ↗
8. Corbion, C., Smith-Ravin, J., Marcelin, O., and Bouajila, J. (2023). An overview of spirits made from sugarcane juice. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28196810 ↗
9. Stewart, G., Kellersshohn, J., and Russel, I. (2022). A short history of rum. Whisky and Other Spirits, Academic Press. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-822076-4.00031-0 ↗
10. Differentiation of rums produced from sugar cane juice (Rhum Agricole) from rums manufactured from sugar cane molasses by a metabolomics approach10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00180 ↗
11. (2025, January 29). Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0787.
12. Fahrasmane, L., and Ganou-Parfait, B. (1997). De la Canne au Rhum, Inra-Quae.
13. Walker, G.M., and Stewart, G.G. (2016). Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the production of fermented beverages. Beverages, 2.10.3390/beverages2040030 ↗
14. The role of spontaneous fermentation for the production of cachaça: A study of case10.1007/s00217-016-2659-3 ↗
15. Microbial flora of rum fermentation media10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00380.x ↗
16. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains obtained from sugar-cane juice fermentations and their impact in cachaca production10.1128/AEM.01729-07 ↗
17. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid against pathogen and spoilage microorganisms10.1111/jfpp.12679 ↗
18. Comparative antibacterial and antifungal activities of sulfur nanoparticles capped with chitosan10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104178 ↗
19. Quian, M.C., Fan, X., and Mahattanatawee, K. (2011). Antimicrobial activity of volatile sulfur compounds in foods. Volatile Sulfur Compounds in Food, American Chemical Society.10.1021/bk-2011-1068 ↗
20. Production of the Sicilian distillate “Spiritu re fascitrari” from honey by-products: An interesting source of yeast diversity10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.004 ↗
21. Guarcello, R., Gaglio, R., Todaro, A., Alfonzo, A., Schicchi, R., Cirlincione, F., Moschetti, G., and Francesca, N. (2019). Insights into the cultivable microbial ecology of “Manna” ash products extracted from Fraxinus angustifolia (Oleaceae) trees in Sicily, Italy. Front. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fmicb.2019.00984 ↗
22. Francesca, N., Pirrone, A., Gugino, I., Prestianni, R., Naselli, V., Settanni, L., Todaro, A., Guzzon, R., Maggio, A., and Porrello, A. (2023). A novel microbiological approach to impact the aromatic composition of sour loquat beer. Food Biosci., 55.10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103011 ↗
23. Moore, P.H., and Botha, F.C. (2013). Developmental stages (phenology). Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology, Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118771280 ↗
24. Chen, J.C., and Chou, C.C. (1993). Cane Sugar Handbook: A Manual for Cane Sugar Manufacturers and Their Chemists, John Wiley & Sons.
25. Pirrone, A., Prestianni, R., Naselli, V., Todaro, A., Farina, V., Tinebra, I., Guzzon, R., Badalamenti, N., Maggio, A., and Gaglio, R. (2022). Influence of indigenous Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae from sugar-rich substrates on the aromatic composition of loquat beer. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 379.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109868 ↗
26. Bioflavoring by non-conventional yeasts in sequential beer fermentations10.1016/j.fm.2017.11.008 ↗
27. Lombardi, S.J., Pannella, G., Coppola, F., Vergalito, F., Maiuro, L., Succi, M., Sorrentino, E., Tremonte, P., and Coppola, R. (2024). Plant-Based Ingredients Utilized as Fat Replacers and Natural Antimicrobial Agents in Beef Burgers. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13203229 ↗
28. Testa, B., Coppola, F., Letizia, F., Albanese, G., Karaulli, J., Ruci, M., Pistillo, M., Germinara, G.S., Messia, M.C., and Succi, M. (2022). Versatility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 41CM in the Brewery Sector: Use as a Starter for “Ale” and “Lager” Craft Beer Production. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10122495 ↗
29. Grumezescu, A.M., and Holban, A.M. (2020). Isolation, selection, and identification techniques for non-Saccharomyces yeasts of oenological interest. Biotechnological Progress and Beverage Consumption, Academic Press.
30. Capozzi, V., Russo, P., Ladero, V., Fernández, M., Fiocco, D., Alvarez, M.A., Grieco, F., and Spano, G. (2012). Biogenic amines degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum: Toward a potential application in wine. Front. Microbiol., 3.10.3389/fmicb.2012.00122 ↗
31. Microbiological and chemical monitoring of Marsala base wine obtained by spontaneous fermentation during large-scale production10.1007/s13213-014-0808-0 ↗
32. Rilevazione della flora microbica di mosti e vini
33. Francesca, N., Gaglio, R., Matraxia, M., Naselli, V., Prestianni, R., Settanni, L., Badalamenti, N., Columba, P., Bruno, M., and Maggio, A. (2022). Technological screening and application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from fermented honey by-products for the sensory improvement of Spiritu re fascitrari, a typical Sicilian distilled beverage. Food Microbiol., 104.10.1016/j.fm.2021.103968 ↗
34. Optimisation of interdelta analysis for Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain characterisation10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00205-2 ↗
35. Alfonzo, A., Prestianni, R., Gaglio, R., Matraxia, M., Maggio, A., Naselli, V., Craparo, V., Badalamenti, N., Bruno, M., and Vagnoli, P. (2021). Effects of different yeast strains, nutrients and glutathione-rich inactivated yeast addition on the aroma characteristics of Catarratto wines. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 360.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109325 ↗
36. (2024, May 19). Compendium of International Methods of Analysis-OIV Total Acidity-Method OIV-MA-AS313-01. Available online: https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/3731/oiv-ma-as313-01.pdf.
37. Matraxia, M., Alfonzo, A., Prestianni, R., Francesca, N., Gaglio, R., Todaro, A., Alfeo, V., Perretti, G., Columba, P., and Settanni, L. (2021). Non-conventional yeasts from fermented honey by-products: Focus on Hanseniaspora uvarum strains for craft beer production. Food Microbiol., 99.10.1016/j.fm.2021.103806 ↗
38. The effect of incorporating herbal (Lippia javanica) infusion on the phenolic, physicochemical, and sensorial properties of fruit wine10.1002/fsn3.2432 ↗
39. Microbiology and physiology of cachaça (aguardente) fermentations10.1023/A:1010225117654 ↗
40. Effect of O2 control and monitoring on the nutraceutical properties of extra virgin olive oils10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.08.009 ↗
41. Generalized space-time classifiers for monitoring sugarcane areas in Brazil10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.017 ↗
42. Estimating sugarcane yield potential using an in-season determination of normalized difference vegetative index10.3390/s120607529 ↗
43. Zhou, Z., Huang, J., Wang, J., Zhang, K., Kuang, Z., Zhong, S., and Song, X. (2015). Object-oriented classification of sugarcane using time-series middle-resolution remote sensing data based on AdaBoost. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0142069 ↗
44. Baez-Gonzalez, A.D., Kiniry, J.R., Meki, M.N., Williams, J., Alvarez-Cilva, M., Ramos-Gonzalez, J.L., Magallanes-Estala, A., and Zapata-Buenfil, G. (2017). Crop parameters for modeling sugarcane under rainfed conditions in Mexico. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9081337 ↗
45. A biophysical model of sugarcane growth10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01105.x ↗
46. Sugarcane maturity estimation through edaphic-climatic parameters10.1590/S0103-90162004000500004 ↗
47. Agronomic performance of sugarcane families in response to water stress10.1590/S0006-87052008000300014 ↗
48. Registration of ‘CP 06-2425’,‘CP 06-2495’,‘CP 06-2964’,‘CP 06-3103’, and ‘CP 07-1313’Sugarcane for Sand Soils in Florida10.3198/jpr2016.09.0045crc ↗
49. Sugarcane leaf area development under field conditions in Florida, USA10.1016/j.fcr.2003.12.005 ↗
50. Sugarcane nodes identification algorithm based on sum of local pixel of minimum points of vertical projection function10.1016/j.compag.2021.105994 ↗
51. Batista, L.M.T., Ribeiro Junior, W.Q., Ramos, M.L.G., Bufon, V.B., Sousa, R.Z., Vinson, C.C., and Deuner, S. (2024). Effect of irrigation on sugarcane morphophysiology in the Brazilian cerrado. Plants, 13.10.3390/plants13070937 ↗
52. Registration of ‘CP 09-1952’sugarcane10.3198/jpr2018.02.0008crc ↗
53. Comparative studies on field performance of micropropagated and conventionally propagated sugarcane plants10.3329/ptcb.v16i1.1102 ↗
54. Pilot demonstration of sugarcane juice ultrafiltration in an Indian sugar factory10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00340-0 ↗
55. Cultivar affects the color change kinetics of sugarcane juice10.1590/fst.15017 ↗
56. The potential use of supercritical carbon dioxide in sugarcane juice processing10.1038/s41538-023-00242-x ↗
57. Sugarcane production: Impact of climate change and its mitigation10.13057/biodiv/d130408 ↗
58. Effects of high temperature on the growth and composition of sugarcane internodes10.1071/AR06042 ↗
59. Evaluation of sugarcane varieties for maturity earliness and selection for efficient sugar accumulation10.1007/BF02942512 ↗
60. Yeast composition of sugar cane juice in relation to plant varieties and seasonality
61. Wang, C., Mas, A., and Esteve-Zarzoso, B. (2016). The interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast during alcoholic fermentation is species and strain specific. Front. Microbiol., 7.10.3389/fmicb.2016.00502 ↗
62. Investigation of chemical quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) wine during fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00305.x ↗
63. O’Hara, I.M., and Mundree, S.G. (2016). Fermentation of sugarcane juice and molasses for ethanol production. Sugarcane-Based Biofuels and Bioproducts, Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118719862 ↗
64. Ren, H., Feng, Y., Pei, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Fu, S., Zheng, Y., Li, Z., and Peng, Z. (2020). Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum additive and temperature on the ensiling quality and microbial community dynamics of cauliflower leaf silages. Bioresour. Technol., 307.10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123238 ↗
65. Chemical and microbiological quality of sugar cane juice influences the concentration of ethyl carbamate and volatile congeners in cachaça10.1002/jib.213 ↗
66. Lino, F.S.D.O., Misiakou, M.A., Kang, K., Li, S.S., da Costa, B.L.V., Basso, T.O., Panagiotou, G., and Sommer, M.O.A. (2021). Strain dynamics of specific contaminant bacteria modulate the performance of ethanol biorefineries. bioRxiv.10.1101/2021.02.07.430133 ↗
67. Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8 S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers10.1099/00207713-49-1-329 ↗
68. Rapid identification of wine yeast species based on RFLP analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region10.1007/s002030050587 ↗
69. Sugarcane juice preservation: A critical review of the state of the art and way forward10.1007/s12355-018-0622-2 ↗
70. (2025, January 31). Appellations of Origin and Local Customs: The Need for Innovation “Le Rhum De La Martinique”: An Example of AOC Recognition of a Product in an Industrialised Context. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae67/241745.html.
71. Killer activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: Partial characterization and strategies to improve the biocontrol efficacy in winemaking10.1007/s10482-014-0256-7 ↗
72. Complex yeast–bacteria interactions affect the yield of industrial ethanol fermentation10.1038/s41467-021-21844-7 ↗
73. Re-assessment of the influence of yeast strain and environmental factors on glycerol production in wine10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00964.x ↗
74. The glycerol and ethanol production kinetics in low-temperature wine fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains10.1111/ijfs.13910 ↗
75. Characterization of the key aroma compounds in two commercial rums by means of the sensomics approach10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05426 ↗
76. Characterization of sensory differences in mixing and premium rums through the use of descriptive sensory analysis10.1111/1750-3841.13936 ↗
77. Characterization of cachaca and rum aroma10.1021/jf0511190 ↗
78. Novel creation of a rum flavor lexicon through the use of web-based material10.1111/1750-3841.13707 ↗
79. Chemical profile of rums as a function of their origin. The use of chemometric techniques for their identification10.1021/jf0726841 ↗
80. Rum classification using fingerprinting analysis of volatile fraction by headspace solid phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.025 ↗
81. Evaluation of volatile compounds and antioxidant capacity of some commercial rums from Dominican Republic10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02597.x ↗
82. (2025, January 31). The Effect of Distillation Conditions and Molasses Concentration on the Volatile Compounds of Unaged Rum. Available online: https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/680ae4cc-dd56-4874-a6d5-af12c2ca187d/content.
83. Characterisation of odour-active compounds in aged rum10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.133 ↗
84. Quantitative ester analysis in cachaça and distilled spirits by gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC−MS)10.1021/jf800551d ↗