Information Merging for Improving Automatic Classification of Electrical Impedance Mammography Images
Source abstract
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide, highlighting the critical need for early and accurate detection methods. Traditional mammography, although widely used, has limitations, including radiation exposure and challenges in detecting early-stage lesions. Electrical Impedance Mammography (EIM) has emerged as a non-invasive and radiation-free alternative that assesses the density and electrical conductivity of breast tissue. EIM images consist of seven layers, each representing different tissue depths, offering a detailed representation of the breast structure. However, analyzing these layers individually can be redundant and complex, making it difficult to identify relevant features for lesion classification. To address this issue, advanced computational techniques are employed for image integration, such as the Root Mean Square (CRMS) Contrast and Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), combined with the Coefficient of Variation (CV), CLAHE-based fusion, weighted average fusion, Gaussian pyramid fusion, and Wavelet–PCA fusion. Each method enhances the representation of tissue features, optimizing the image quality and diagnostic utility. This study evaluated the impact of these integration techniques on EIM image analysis, aiming to improve the accuracy and reliability of computational diagnostic models for breast cancer detection. According to the obtained results, the best performance was achieved using Wavelet–PCA fusion in combination with XGBoost as a classifier, yielding an accuracy rate of 89.5% and an F1-score of 81.5%. These results are highly encouraging for the further investigation of this topic.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica, Luis Enrique Erro 1, Puebla 72840, Mexico
Unidad de Investigación en Epidemiología Clínica, OOAD Guanajuato, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Blvd. Adolfo López Mateos, León Guanajuato 37320, Mexico
Funding
IMSS
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2020). Breast Cancer. WHO Fact Sheets, World Health Organization.
2. INEGI (2023). Estadisticas a Propósito del Día Internacional de la Lucha Contra el Cáncer de Mama (19 de Octubre), INEGI. Comunicado de prensa número 595/23.
3. Ghadge, D., Hon, S., Saraf, T., Wagh, T., Tambe, A., and Deshmukh, Y. (2024, January 21–23). Analysis on Machine Learning-Based Early Breast Cancer Detection. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM), Noida, India.10.1109/ICIPTM59628.2024.10563587 ↗
4. National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre (2009). Breast Cancer Risk Factors: A Review of the Evidence, National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre.
5. ACR BI-RADS® Mammography
6. Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets10.1109/TMI.2018.2870343 ↗
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography10.2214/AJR.07.2231 ↗
8. The impact of early detection on cancer survival
9. Machine Learning for the Analysis of Conductivity From Mono Frequency Electrical Impedance Mammography as a Breast Cancer Risk Factor10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3122948 ↗
10. Electrical impedance tomography of breast cancer: Clinical trial results
11. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: A clinical study
12. Scharfetter, H., and Merwa, R. (September, January 29). Particularities of electrical impedance images in different forms of growth of infiltrative breast cancer. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance (ICEBI), Graz, Austria.
13. Utilisation of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
14. Korotkova, M., Karpov, A., Machin, M., Tsofin, Y., Tsyplyonkov, V., and Tchayev, A. (2002). Electric Impedance Imaging of the Mammary Gland in Circumstances of Skin Abnormality or Damage, Clinical Hospital №9.
15. Diagnostic criteria for mass lesions differentiating in electrical impedance mammography10.1088/1742-6596/434/1/012053 ↗
16. Electro-impedance mammograms for automatic breast cancer screening: First insights on Mexican patients
17. Kurinjimalar, R., Pradeep, J., and Harikrishnan, M. (2024, January 27–28). Underwater Image Enhancement Using Gaussian Pyramid, Laplacian Pyramid and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 3rd World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC), Gwalior, India.10.1109/AIC61668.2024.10730935 ↗
18. Bhat, M., and S, T.P.M. (2014, January 8–10). Adaptive clip limit for contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) of medical images using least mean square algorithm. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communications, Control and Computing Technologies, Ramanathapuram, India.10.1109/ICACCCT.2014.7019300 ↗
19. Sousa, A.L., Villar, S.A., Korneta, W., Acosta, G., and Rozenfeld, A. (2016, January 15–17). Resonancia estocástica para el mejoramiento del contraste y calidad en imágenes acústicas de sonar de barrido lateral. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON), Buenos Aires, Argentina.10.1109/ARGENCON.2016.7585323 ↗
20. Iterative Gaussian–Laplacian Pyramid Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification10.1109/TGRS.2024.3367127 ↗
21. Realization of the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) for Real-Time Image Enhancement10.1023/B:VLSI.0000028532.53893.82 ↗
22. Wu, J., Liu, J., Tian, J., and Yin, B. (2006, January 25–28). Wavelet-based Remote Sensing Image Fusion with PCA and Feature Product. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Luoyang, China.10.1109/ICMA.2006.257589 ↗
23. Krishn, A., Bhateja, V., and Sahu, A. (2014, January 24–27). Medical image fusion using combination of PCA and wavelet analysis. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Delhi, India.10.1109/ICACCI.2014.6968636 ↗
24. Taxak, N., and Singhal, S. (2019, January 23–24). High PSNR based Image Fusion by Weighted Average Brovery Transform Method. Proceedings of the 2019 Devices for Integrated Circuit (DevIC), Kalyani, India.10.1109/DEVIC.2019.8783400 ↗
25. Pessoa, D., Petmezas, G., Papageorgiou, V.E., Rocha, B.M., Stefanopoulos, L., Kilintzis, V., Maglaveras, N., Frerichs, I., de Carvalho, P., and Paiva, R.P. (2023, January 19–21). Pediatric Respiratory Sound Classification Using a Dual Input Deep Learning Architecture. Proceedings of the IEEE BioCAS Grand Challenge, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/BioCAS58349.2023.10388733 ↗
26. A Deep Learning Method for Predicting the COVID-19 ICU Patient Outcome Fusing X-rays, Respiratory Sounds, and ICU Parameters10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121089 ↗
27. Azam, K.S.F., Ryabchykov, O., and Bocklitz, T. (2022). A Review on Data Fusion of Multidimensional Medical and Biomedical Data. Molecules, 27.10.3390/molecules27217448 ↗
28. Diagnóstico de cáncer de mama mediante mamografía por electroimpedancia computarizada MEIK
29. Conditioning Electrical Impedance Mammography System10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.052 ↗
30. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions10.4149/BLL_2016_098 ↗
31. Clasificación radiológica y manejo de las lesiones mamarias
32. Alexander Karpov, A.K., and Korotkova, M. (2015). An Electrical Impedance Mammographic Scheme—Norms and Pathology. Mammography Techniques and Review, IntechOpen.10.5772/60014 ↗
33. Gonzalez, R.C., and Woods, R.E. (2008). Digital Image Processing, Pearson.
34. Alvarado-Godínez, J., Peregrina-Barreto, H., Farías, D.I.H., and Ortiz, B.O.M. (2024, January 11–13). Automatic Breast Lesions Classification in Electrical Impedance Mammography. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC 2024), Ixtapa, Mexico.10.1109/ROPEC62734.2024.10877087 ↗
35. Contrast in complex images10.1364/JOSAA.7.002032 ↗
36. Automatic Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization with Dual Gamma Correction10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2797872 ↗
37. The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code10.1109/TCOM.1983.1095851 ↗
38. Tensor Sparse Representation for 3-D Medical Image Fusion Using Weighted Average Rule10.1109/TBME.2018.2811243 ↗
39. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
40. A review of convolutional neural networks in computer vision10.1007/s10462-024-10721-6 ↗
41. Uncertainty CNNs: A path to enhanced medical image classification performance10.3934/mbe.2025020 ↗
42. Papageorgiou, V.E., Zegkos, T., Efthimiadis, G., and Tsaklidis, G. (2022). Analysis of digitalized ECG signals based on artificial intelligence and spectral analysis methods specialized in ARVC. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng., 38.10.1002/cnm.3644 ↗
43. Application of the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay
44. Segal, M.R. (2004). Machine Learning Benchmarks and Random Forest Regression, UCSF: Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics.
45. Bagging predictors10.1023/A:1018054314350 ↗
46. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the KDD ’16: 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
47. Temporal-Like Bivariate Fay-Herriot Model: Leveraging Past Responses and Advanced Preprocessing for Enhanced Small Area Estimation of Growing Stock Volume10.1007/s43069-023-00288-3 ↗
48. Georgakis, A., Papageorgiou, V.E., and Stamatellos, G. (2024). A new approach to small area estimation: Improving forest management unit estimates with advanced preprocessing in a multivariate Fay–Herriot model. Forestry, 1–18.10.1093/forestry/cpae061 ↗