Readability Formulas for Elementary School Texts in Mexican Spanish
Source abstract
Abstract
Readability formulas are mathematical functions that assess the ‘difficulty’ level of a given text. They play a crucial role in aligning educational texts with student reading abilities; however, existing models are often not tailored to specific linguistic or regional contexts. This study aims to develop and evaluate two novel readability formulas specifically designed for the Mexican Spanish language, targeting elementary education levels. The formulas were trained on a corpus of 540 texts drawn from official elementary-level textbooks issued by the Mexican public education system. The first formula was constructed using multiple linear regression, emulating the structure of traditional readability models. The second was derived through genetic programming (GP), a machine learning technique that evolves symbolic expressions based on training data. Both approaches prioritize interpretability and use standard textual features, such as sentence length, word length, and lexical and syntactic complexity. Experimental results show that the proposed formulas outperform several well-established Spanish and non-Spanish readability formulas in distinguishing between grade levels, particularly for early and intermediate stages of elementary education. The GP-based formula achieved the highest alignment with target grade levels while maintaining a clear analytical form. These findings underscore the potential of combining machine learning with interpretable modeling techniques and highlight the importance of linguistic and curricular adaptation in readability assessment tools.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Text Readability and Simplification · Natural Language Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems and Computation, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Guzmán, Ciudad Guzmán 49100, Mexico
Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Unidad Académica Tepic, Tepic 63155, Mexico
Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Unidad Monterrey, Apodaca 66628, Mexico
Funding
Tecnológico Nacional de México
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Fry, E.B. (1977). Elementary Reading Instruction, McGraw-Hill.
2. Lexical Complexity Prediction: An Overview10.1145/3557885 ↗
3. Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations in the Analysis of Text Difficulty10.1007/s10648-011-9181-8 ↗
4. The Relative Contribution of Language Complexity to Second Language Video Lectures Difficulty Assessment10.1111/modl.12773 ↗
5. Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Graft-Versus-Host Disease10.1007/s13187-023-02271-2 ↗
6. Vajjala, S. (2022). Trends, Limitations and Open Challenges in Automatic Readability Assessment Research. arXiv.
7. Imperial, J.M. (2021). BERT Embeddings for Automatic Readability Assessment. arXiv.
8. Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., and Schneider, J. (2019). Automatic Text Difficulty Estimation Using Embeddings and Neural Networks. Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning Delft, The Netherlands, 16–19 September 2019, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7 ↗
9. Jiang, Z., Gu, Q., Yin, Y., and Chen, D. (2018, January 20–26). Enriching Word Embeddings with Domain Knowledge for Readability Assessment. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
10. Supervised and Unsupervised Neural Approaches to Text Readability10.1162/coli_a_00398 ↗
11. Investigating readability of French as a foreign language with deep learning and cognitive and pedagogical features
12. Tetreault, J., Burstein, J., Kochmar, E., Leacock, C., and Yannakoudakis, H. (2018, January 5). Estimating Linguistic Complexity for Science Texts. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, New Orleans, LA, USA.
13. Lee, B.W., Jang, Y.S., and Lee, J.H.J. (2024). Pushing on Text Readability Assessment: A Transformer Meets Handcrafted Linguistic Features. arXiv.
14. Alaparthi, V.S., Pawar, A.A., Suneera, C.M., and Prakash, J. (2022, January 25–27). Rating Ease of Readability using Transformers. Proceedings of the 2022 14th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICCAE55086.2022.9762413 ↗
15. Flesch, R.F. (1949). Art of Readable Writing, MAcmilla Publishing.10.2307/1225957 ↗
16. Medidas sencillas de lecturabilidad
17. Gutiérrez de Polini, L.E. (1972). Investigación Sobre Lectura en Venezuela. Technical report, Primeras Jornadas de Educación Primaria.
18. Szigriszt-Pazos, F. (1993). Sistemas Predictivos de Legibilidad del Mensaje Escrito: Fórmula de Perspicuidad. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información].
19. Barrio Cantalejo, I.M. (2007). Legibilidad y Salud: Los métodos de Medición de la Legibilidad y su Aplicación al Diseño de Folletos Educativos Sobre Salud. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid].
20. Legibilidad y variabilidad de los textos
21. Crawford, A.N. (1984). A Spanish Language Fry-Type Readability Procedure: Elementary Level, Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
22. The SOL Formulas for Converting SMOG Readability Scores Between Health Education Materials Written in Spanish, English, and French10.1080/108107399127066 ↗
23. Gulpease: Una formula per la predizione della difficolta dei testi in lingua italiana
24. Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Goggi, S., Grobelnik, M., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Mazo, H., Moreno, A., and Odijk, J. (2016, January 23–28). OSMAN—A Novel Arabic Readability Metric. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), Portorož, Slovenia.
25. A Machine Learning-Based Model to Evaluate Readability and Assess Grade Level for the Web Pages10.1093/comjnl/bxaa113 ↗
26. Combining Readability Formulas and Machine Learning for Reader-oriented Evaluation of Online Health Resources10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077073 ↗
27. Legibilidad del texto, métricas de complejidad y la importancia de las palabras
28. Exploring Automatic Readability Assessment for Science Documents within a Multilingual Educational Context10.1007/s40593-024-00393-2 ↗
29. Automated readability assessment for spanish e-government information
30. Bird, S., and Loper, E. (2004, January 21–26). NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit. Proceedings of the ACL Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, Barcelona, Spain.10.3115/1219044.1219075 ↗
31. A faster algorithm for ridge regression of reduced rank data10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00034-8 ↗
32. Koza, J.R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press.
33. Numeric mutation improves the discovery of numeric constants in genetic programming
34. Rodriguez-Coayahuitl, L., Morales-Reyes, A., and Escalante, H.J. (2023). TurboGP: A flexible and advanced python based GP library. arXiv.
35. Stephens, T. (2025, June 05). Genetic Programming in Python with a Scikit-Learn Inspired API. Available online: https://gplearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable.
36. DEAP: Evolutionary algorithms made easy
37. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples)10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
38. Tukey, J.W. (1953). The Problem of Multiple Comparisons, Princeton University. Unpublished Manuscript.
39. Selection of wavelet and thresholding rule for denoising the ECG signals