XSQ-Learning: Adaptive Similarity Thresholds for Accelerated and Stable Q-Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning (RL) enables agents to learn optimal policies through environment interaction, with Q-learning being a fundamental algorithm for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). However, Q-learning suffers from slow convergence due to its exhaustive exploration requirements, particularly in large state spaces where Q-value estimation becomes computationally expensive, whether using tabular methods or Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). To address this limitation, we propose XSQ-Learning, a novel algorithm that accelerates convergence by leveraging similarities between state–action pairs to generalize Q-value updates intelligently. XSQ-Learning introduces two key innovations: (1) an adaptive update mechanism that propagates temporal-difference errors to similar states proportionally to their similarity, and (2) a similarity-aware control strategy that regulates which updates are propagated and to what extent. Our experiments demonstrate that XSQ-Learning can reduce the required iterations by 36.83% compared to standard Q-learning and by 24.43% versus state-of-the-art similarity-based methods, while maintaining policy stability. These results show that similarity-based value propagation can significantly enhance RL efficiency without compromising learning reliability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and ELM
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Unidad Académica Tepic, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Tepic 63173, Mexico
Department of Systems and Computation, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Guzmán, Ciudad Guzmán 49100, Mexico
Funding
National Council of Humanities, Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCYT)
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press.
2. Watkins, C.J.C.H. (1989). Learning from Delayed Rewards. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge].
3. Technical Note: Q-Learning10.1007/BF00992698 ↗
4. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning10.1038/nature14236 ↗
5. Multirobot unknown environment exploration and obstacle avoidance based on a Voronoi diagram and reinforcement learning10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125900 ↗
6. Hierarchical Control Framework for Path Planning of Mobile Robots in Dynamic Environments Through Global Guidance and Reinforcement Learning
7. Liao, W., Wei, X., and Lai, J. (2021). Smooth Q-learning: Accelerate Convergence of Q-learning Using Similarity. arXiv.
8. Leveraging human knowledge in tabular reinforcement learning: A study of human subjects10.1017/S0269888918000206 ↗
9. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy
10. Similarity and the development of rules10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00002-X ↗
11. Retrieval dynamics and retention in cross-situational statistical word learning10.1111/cogs.12092 ↗
12. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
13. Raynal, L. (2022). Cognitive Flexibility and Analogy, Wiley.10.1002/9781119902737.ch7 ↗
14. X-FSPMiner: A Novel Algorithm for Frequent Similar Pattern Mining
15. Liu, Y., Ding, J., Wang, H., and Du, Y. (2025). A Clustering Algorithm Based on the Detection of Density Peaks and the Interaction Degree Between Clusters. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073612 ↗
16. A novel distance measure based on dynamic time warping to improve time series classification10.1016/j.ins.2023.119921 ↗
17. Grané, A., Manzi, G., and Salini, S. (2022). Dynamic Mixed Data Analysis and Visualization. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24101399 ↗
18. Girgin, S., Polat, F., and Alhajj, R. (2006, January 20–23). Effectiveness of considering state similarity for reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Burgos, Spain.10.1007/11875581_20 ↗
19. State Similarity Based Approach for Improving Performance in RL
20. Positive impact of state similarity on reinforcement learning performance10.1109/TSMCB.2007.899419 ↗
21. An introduction to intertask transfer for reinforcement learning
22. Li, W., and Meleis, W. (2018, January 27–29). Similarity-aware Kanerva coding for on-line reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1145/3271553.3271609 ↗
23. Whiteson, S., Taylor, M.E., and Stone, P. (2007). Adaptive Tile Coding for Value Function Approximation, University of Texas at Austin. Technical Report AI-TR-07-339.
24. Lin, S., and Wright, R. (2010, January 11–12). Evolutionary tile coding: An automated state abstraction algorithm for reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the Workshops at the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, GA, USA.
25. Rosenfeld, A., Taylor, M.E., and Kraus, S. (2017, January 8–12). Speeding up tabular reinforcement learning using state-action similarities. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Sao Paulo, Brazil.