Foot-Mediated Ground Loading and the Role of Basic and Passive Balance Point—Towards Detecting Posture Abnormalities
Source abstract
Abstract
(1) Background: The paper focuses on foot biomechanics in static situations. The aim was to determine the distribution of the load exerted by the human body on the ground in order to establish reference points on the foot for correct human body posture. (2) Methods: A model was developed to describe the body weight-ground relationship, consisting of a support platform and a part imitating the rest of the human body. Experiments consisted of tilting the general centre of gravity from the maximum forward through midfoot, a passive, neutral position, to the maximum backwards while maintaining balance. The ground load was measured in each position. (3) Results: The loads of the front and rear parts of the support platform and the resultant load force at different degrees of body tilt were calculated. It has been shown that at the maximum inclination of the body to the extreme support point, the entire weight falls on this point. For the neutral position (in the Basic Balance Point), the load on the front and rear parts of the support platform was 26% and 74%, and 40% and 60% for the passive position (in the Passive Balance Point). (4) Conclusions: The distribution of body weight on the ground is determined by the projection of the general centre of gravity on the ground through the feet. The resultant ground reaction force defines both the magnitude and direction of the load exerted on the support platform. Ground reaction forces associated with body weight were assessed at five anatomical points of the foot: the forefoot, rearfoot, midfoot, and the Passive and Basic Balance Point. In an upright standing posture, the projection of the general centre of gravity fluctuates between the Passive and Basic Balance Point, corresponding to the passive and neutral positions, respectively. Only in the neutral position, the body’s weight, as concentrated in the general centre of gravity, falls on the axis of the upper ankle joint and distributes the load between the forefoot and rearfoot. Determining the correct distribution of foot loads may serve in the future to study abnormalities in human body posture
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Medicare Clinic, 603 Oxford Road, Reading RG30 1HL, UK
Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 7e St., 31-034 Kraków, Poland
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Kapandji, A. (2020). The Physiology of the Joints, Handspring Publishing. [7th ed.].
2. The Myth of Muscle Balance10.1302/0301-620X.67B3.3997956 ↗
3. Are There Changes in the Foot Biomechanics during the before and after Fifth Metatarsal Fracture Running Stance Phase?10.1016/j.isci.2025.112432 ↗
4. Bochenek, A., and Reicher, M. (2010). Anatomia Człowieka. Tom 1, Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.
5. Vogl, A., Mitchell, A., and Drake, R. (2016). Gray Anatomia. Podręcznik Dla Studentów Książka, Edra Urban & Partner.
6. Randomized Controlled Trial of Gastrocnemius Muscle Analysis Using Surface Electromyography and Ultrasound in Different Striking Patterns of Young Women’s Barefoot Running10.5334/paah.382 ↗
7. Levangie, P.K., and Cynthia, N.C. (2005). The Ankle and Foot Complex. Joint Structure and Function: A Comprehensive Analysis, McGraw Hill.
8. Schunke, M., Schulte, E., and Schumacher, U. (2006). Prometeus Lern Atlas Der Anatomie Tom 1, Thieme.
9. A Musculoskeletal Model of the Human Lower Extremity: The Effect of Muscle, Tendon, and Moment Arm on the Moment-Angle Relationship of Musculotendon Actuators at the Hip, Knee, and Ankle10.1016/0021-9290(90)90349-8 ↗
10. Azar, F.M., Beaty, J.H., and Canale, S.T. (2020). Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, Elsevier. [14th ed.].
11. Levine, D., Richards, J., and Whittle, M.W. (2022). Whittle’s Gait Analysis, Elsevier. [6th ed.].
12. Xu, D., Zhou, H., Quan, W., Ma, X., Chon, T.E., Fernandez, J., Gusztav, F., Kovács, A., Baker, J.S., and Gu, Y. (2024). New Insights Optimize Landing Strategies to Reduce Lower Limb Injury Risk. Cyborg Bionic Syst., 5.10.34133/cbsystems.0126 ↗
13. The Real Rotational Capacity of the Human Joints—The Muscular and Gravitational Torques and the Foot as a Platform10.37190/ABB-02462-2024-04 ↗
14. Dygut, J., and Piwowar, M. (2024). Torques in the Human Upper Ankle Joint Level and Their Importance in Conservative and Surgical Treatment. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-57698-4 ↗
15. Utilizing Anthropometric Measurements and 3D Scanning for Health Assessment in Clinical Practice10.5334/paah.379 ↗
16. Nordin, M., and Frankel, H. (2012). Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer Buisness.
17. Morton, D.J. (1935). The Human Foot: Its Evolution, Physiology and Functional Disorders, Columbia University Press.
18. Dygut, J., and Piwowar, M. (2025). The Methods of Determining the Centre of Gravity of a Tilting Body on the Upper Ankle Joint and Weighing the Feet of a Living Human. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126812 ↗
19. Anatomical Data for Analyzing Human Motion10.1080/02701367.1983.10605290 ↗
20. R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
21. Hicks, J.H. (1962). The Three Weight-Bearing Mechanisms of the Foot. Biomechanical Studies of the Musculo-Skeletal System, Charles C Thomas Publisher.
22. Walsh, E.G. (1992). Muscles, Masses and Motion: The Physiology of Normality, Hypotonicity, Spasticity and Rigidity, Cambridge University Press.
23. Understanding and Measurement of Muscle Tone as Related to Clinical Muscle Pain10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00102-4 ↗
24. The Passive, Human Calf Muscles in Relation to Standing: The Short Range Stiffness Lies in the Contractile Component10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140053 ↗