journal article·2025-06-25Open access

Environmental Impact of Massive Food Services and Homemade Meals: A Case Study on Stewed Chickpeas

Natalia Velastín, Rodrigo Contreras-Núñez, Ernesto Pino-Cortés, Lorena Espinoza Pérez, Fidel Vallejo, Andrea Espinoza Pérez

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

The consequences of climate change directly affect food production and threaten food security. Therefore, efforts are needed to reduce environmental impacts while ensuring access to food. Massive food services play a key role in this context; however, related literature lacks comparative studies between home cooking and restaurants. Through life-cycle assessment, this research compares the environmental impacts generated by stewed chickpeas, a nutritious and flavorful meal prepared at a large food service offered by a public university, and those prepared at home using two recipes. The system boundaries consider the impact of ingredient production, processing, cooking, cooling, and reheating, as well as waste and wastewater generation. The functional unit (FU) weighs 100 g to facilitate comparison. The findings indicate that the recipe from the massive food service has a significant impact on human health, resulting in 3.54·10−7 DALY; meanwhile, the other two scenarios generate approximately 7.2·10−7 DALY. Moreover, regarding biodiversity impact, the recipe from the massive food service reaches 8.57·10−10 species.yr; by contrast, the other scenarios generate around 1.01·10−10 species.yr. Massive food services exhibit a lower environmental impact than home meals in preparing stewed chickpeas. This difference is primarily attributed to the cooling and reheating stages that occur when eating outside the home.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Santiago of Chile, Estación Central, Santiago 9170124, Chile

Équipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs, Université de Lorraine, ERPI, F-54000 Nancy, France

Escuela de Ingeniería Química, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362854, Chile

Program for the Development of Sustainable Production Systems (PDSPS), University of Santiago of Chile, Estación Central, Santiago 9170124, Chile

Industrial Engineering, National University of Chimborazo, Riobamba 060108, Ecuador

ProcesLab Research Group, National University of Chimborazo, Riobamba 060108, Ecuador

Funding

Universidad de Santiago de Chile · Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) · Dirección de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (DICYT) of the Universidad de Santiago de Chile

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Reis, M.B., Colorado Lopera, H.A., Vieira, C.M.F., Azevedo, A.R.G., Carvalho, E.A.S., and Monteiro, S.N. (2024). Development of Artificial Stone through the Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste in a Polymeric Matrix. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16145952 ↗
2. Velásquez, C., Espín, F., Castro, M.Á., and Rodríguez, F. (2024). Energy Efficiency in Public Lighting Systems Friendly to the Environment and Protected Areas. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16125113 ↗
3. Cambio Climático y Desarrollo Sostenible10.53595/rlo.2021.1.008 ↗
4. Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Dokken, D.J., Ebi, K.L., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.-K., and Allen, S.K. (2024, September 11). SPECIAL REPORT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters-to-advance-climate-change-adaptation/.
5. Circular Food System Approaches Can Support Current European Protein Intake Levels While Reducing Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions10.1038/s43016-024-00975-2 ↗
6. Where Are the Best Opportunities for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Food System (Including the Food Chain)?10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10.010 ↗
7. Environmental Footprints of Mediterranean versus Western Dietary Patterns: Beyond the Health Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet10.1186/1476-069X-12-118 ↗
8. Environmental Mitigation Potential of Waste-to-Nutrition Pathways10.1038/s41893-025-01521-z ↗
9. Environmental and Nutrition Impact of Achieving New School Food Plan Recommendations in the Primary School Meals Sector in England10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013840 ↗
10. The Nutritional and Toxicological Value of Organic Vegetables10.1108/00070700920992916 ↗
11. Consumer Expectation and Responses to Environmental Sustainability Initiatives and Their Impact in Foodservice Operations: A Systematic Review10.1111/jhn.12897 ↗
12. Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Convenience Food: Comparison of Ready and Home-Made Meals10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.008 ↗
13. Assessing GHG Emissions of Food Consumption towards Low-Carbon Transformation in China10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107408 ↗
14. Takacs, B., and Borrion, A. (2020). The Use of Life Cycle-Based Approaches in the Food Service Sector to Improve Sustainability: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093504 ↗
15. Research on Carbon Emissions of Urban Residents’ Three Types of Dining Based on the Whole Life Cycle10.1093/ijlct/ctac069 ↗
16. Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Individual Meals—Does It Really Make a Difference to Choose Plant-Based Meals Instead of Meat-Based Ones?10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134782 ↗
17. Virtanen, Y., Kurppa, S., Saarinen, M., Mäenpää, I., Mäkelä, J., and Grönroos, J. (2010). Carbon Footprint of Food—An Approach from National Level and from a Food Portion, BOKU University.
18. Potential Environmental Benefits from Food Waste Prevention in the Food Service Sector10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.023 ↗
19. Validating Nutrient Selection for Product-Group-Specific Nutrient Indices for Use as Functional Units in Life Cycle Assessment of Foods10.1017/S0007114524000709 ↗
20. Harrer, M., Danzer, J., Aschemann, R., and Hölbling, S. (2021). Low Carbon Diet: Integrating Gastronomy Service Emissions into the Carbon Management of the University of Graz. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132413680 ↗
21. Peano, C., Girgenti, V., Sciascia, S., Barone, E., and Sottile, F. (2022). Dietary Patterns at the Individual Level through a Nutritional and Environmental Approach: The Case Study of a School Canteen. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11071008 ↗
22. Kretschmer, S., and Dehm, S. (2021). Sustainability Transitions in University Food Service—A Living Lab Approach of Locavore Meal Planning and Procurement. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137305 ↗
23. Life Cycle Assessment of Food Systems10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.014 ↗
24. Wallace, T.C., Murray, R., and Zelman, K.M. (2016). The Nutritional Value and Health Benefits of Chickpeas and Hummus. Nutrients, 8.10.3390/nu8120766 ↗
25. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Applied to the Process Industry: A Review10.1007/s11367-012-0432-9 ↗
26. Systematic Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Different Fresh Food Categories10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082 ↗
27. Sustainability Benefits of Transitioning from Current Diets to Plant-Based Alternatives or Whole-Food Diets in Sweden10.1038/s41467-024-45328-6 ↗
28. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts in the Catering Sector: The Case of Pasta10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.074 ↗