journal article·2025-06-21Open access

Fairness Criteria in Multi-Agent Systems: Optimizing Autonomous Traffic Management Through the Hierarchical Stackelberg Strategy

Atef Gharbi, Mohamed Ayari, Nadhir Ben Halima, Akil Elkamel, Zeineb Klai

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

As urban traffic density and congestion increase, effective urban traffic management becomes increasingly challenging, negatively impacting travel times and the overall efficiency of transportation systems. In this paper, a hierarchical Stackelberg model is presented to address both priority for emergency vehicles (EVs) and fairness for other vehicles. This model involves the Traffic Management Center (TMC) as the top-level authority, with emergency vehicles as the first-level leaders and regular vehicles (RVs) as the second-level followers. The multilevel decision-making structure enables real-time adjustments to prioritize critical traffic and ensure equitable treatment for regular traffic. Simulations were conducted under various traffic scenarios, including normal conditions, emergency vehicle priority, and peak traffic congestion. According to the results, the hierarchical Stackelberg model outperforms traditional models in terms of reducing average travel time, waiting time, and congestion. The model also incorporates fairness metrics such as Gini coefficients and skewness to ensure that regular vehicles are not disproportionately affected by emergency vehicle priority. According to these findings, the hierarchical Stackelberg model improves both traffic efficiency and fairness in complex urban environments, positioning it as a promising solution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Supply Chain and Inventory Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha 91911, Saudi Arabia

Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha 91911, Saudi Arabia

Department of Information Technology, Community College of Qatar, Doha 7344, Qatar

Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha 91911, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A review of the self-adaptive traffic signal control system based on future traffic environment
2. Evaluating semi-cooperative Nash/Stackelberg Q-learning for traffic routes plan in a single intersection10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104525 ↗
3. Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Ma, X., Yue, W., and Jiang, R. (2023, January 24–28). Large-scale traffic signal control by a nash deep Q-network approach. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Bilbao, Spain.10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422534 ↗
4. Oszczypała, M., Ziółkowski, J., Małachowski, J., and Lęgas, A. (2023). Nash equilibrium and Stackelberg approach for traffic flow optimization in road transportation networks—A case study of Warsaw. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053085 ↗
5. Coordinating urban power-traffic networks: A subsidy-based Nash–Stackelberg–Nash game model10.1109/TII.2022.3182124 ↗
6. Bateman, B. (2024). Nash, Stackelberg and Hybrid Games-Studies for Game-Theoretic Control of Autonomous Vehicles. [Master’s Thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia].
7. Cui, Y., Tang, J., Luo, Q., Feng, Z., and Huang, T. (2024). A Nash-Stackelberg Game Theoretic Planner for Many-to-few Multi-vehicle Racing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., 1–14.10.1109/TIV.2024.3478391 ↗
8. Sun, L., Cai, M., Zhan, W., and Tomizuka, M. (2020, January 25–29). A game-theoretic strategy-aware interaction algorithm with validation on real traffic data. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340988 ↗
9. Sattari, M.R.J., Malakooti, H., Jalooli, A., and Noor, R.M. (2014). A dynamic vehicular traffic control using ant colony and traffic light optimization. Advances in Systems Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01857-7_6 ↗
10. Ziółkowski, J., Zieja, M., and Oszczypała, M. (2019, January 2–4). Forecasting of the traffic flow distribution in the transport network. Proceedings of the 23rd International Scientific Conference Transport Means 2019, Palanga, Lithuania.
11. Zhao, X., Hu, L., Wang, X., and Wu, J. (2022). Study on Identification and Prevention of Traffic Congestion Zones Considering Resilience-Vulnerability of Urban Transportation Systems. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142416907 ↗
12. Hybrid Graph Convolution Neural Network and Branch-and-Bound Optimization for Traffic Flow Forecasting10.1016/j.future.2022.09.018 ↗
13. Zeng, H., Jiang, C., Lan, Y., Huang, X., Wang, J., and Yuan, X. (2023). Long Short-Term Fusion Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Traffic Flow Forecasting. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12010238 ↗
14. Anjaneyulu, M., and Kubendiran, M. (2023). Short-Term Traffic Congestion Prediction Using Hybrid Deep Learning Technique. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010074 ↗
15. Traffic signal timing via deep reinforcement learning10.1109/JAS.2016.7508798 ↗
16. Liang, X., Du, X., Wang, G., and Han, Z. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning for traffic light control in vehicular networks. arXiv.
17. Shabestary, S.M.A., and Abdulhai, B. (2018, January 4–7). Deep learning vs. discrete reinforcement learning for adaptive traffic signal control. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, MI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569549 ↗
18. Adaptive traffic signal control: Exploring reward definition for reinforcement learning10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.327 ↗
19. Li, X., Zhang, C., Hao, J., Tuyls, K., Chen, S., and Feng, Z. (September, January 29). Socially-aware multi-agent learning: Towards socially optimal outcomes. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hague, The Netherlands.
20. Multi-agent game abstraction via graph attention neural network
21. Neighborhood cognition consistent multi-agent reinforcement learning
22. Stackelberg Routing on Parallel Networks with Horizontal Queues10.1109/TAC.2013.2289709 ↗
23. The Noncooperative Transportation Problem and Linear Generalized Nash Games10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.001 ↗
24. Optimal Transport and Cournot-Nash Equilibria10.1287/moor.2015.0719 ↗
25. Competitive, Cooperative and Stackelberg Congestion Pricing for Multiple Regions in Transportation Networks10.1080/18128602.2010.502547 ↗
26. Stackelberg Game Model of Railway Freight Pricing Based on Option Theory10.1155/2020/6436729 ↗
27. Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Yang, K. (2019). Incentive Contract Design for the Water-Rail-Road Intermodal Transportation with Travel Time Uncertainty: A Stackelberg Game Approach. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21020161 ↗
28. Nash Game-Based Distributed Control Design for Balancing Traffic Density Over Freeway Networks10.1109/TCNS.2015.2428332 ↗
29. Resilience-based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813 ↗
30. Risk-based importance factors for bridge networks under highway traffic loads10.1080/15732479.2018.1496119 ↗
31. Applying a joint model of crash count and crash severity to identify road segments with high risk of fatal and serious injury crashes10.1016/j.aap.2020.105615 ↗
32. Refining a crash risk framework for urban bus safety assessment: Evidence from Sardinia (Italy)10.1016/j.ress.2024.110003 ↗