Empirical Study on Failure Prediction of Rotating Biological Contactors Available for Landfill Site Operators: Scoring Analysis Based on 17-Year Daily Inspection Reports
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a practical method for the early detection of failure signs in a rotating biological contactor (RBC) system that has been in long-term operation at a municipal solid waste landfill. Seventeen years of inspection logs, recorded between 2006 and 2023, were digitized and analyzed with a focus on abnormal noise, electric current values, operational status, and failure history. The analysis revealed that frequent occurrences of abnormal noise and sudden fluctuations in current tend to precede equipment failures. Based on these findings, we developed a scoring model for the predictive maintenance of RBCs. Traditionally, determining the score required professional knowledge such as performing a sensitivity analysis. However, by utilizing AI (ChatGPT o4), we were able to obtain recommended values for these parameters. This means that operators can now build and adjust a scoring model for predictive maintenance of RBCs according to their specific on-site conditions. On the other hand, sudden increases in current and abnormal noises were previously considered strong indicators of failure prediction. These parameters will depend on factors such as the sensitivity of electrical current meters and surrounding noise. Therefore, depending on the specific environmental conditions at the site, the scoring model developed in this study may have limited predictive accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Material Cycles Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8506, Ibaraki, Japan
Material Cycles and Waste Management Group, Center for Environmental Science in Saitama (CESS), 914 Kamitanadare, Kazo 347-0115, Saitama, Japan
Funding
Ministry of Environment
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Bioaugmentation for treating transient 4-fluorocinnamic acid shock loads in a rotating biological contactor10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.010 ↗
2. Performance and operation of a rotating biological contactor in a tilapia recirculating aquaculture system10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.06.005 ↗
3. Brenner, R.C., Heidam, J.A., Opatken, E.J., and Petraske, A.C. (1984). Design Information on Rotating Biological Contactors, U. S. EPA. EPA-600/2-84-106.
4. Mechanical evolution of the rotating biological contactor into the 21st century10.1243/095440803322328863 ↗
5. Performance evaluation of laboratory scale RBC to treat wastewater from hostels
6. Applications of rotating biological contactors in wastewater treatment
7. Removal of organic pollutant with the use of rotating biological contactor10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.685 ↗
8. Study of rotating biological contactors (RBCs) for wastewater treatment process
9. EPA (1985). Review of Current RBC Performance and Design Procedures, U. S. EPA. EPA/600/S2-85/033.
10. Activated sludge process versus rotating biological contactors in WWTPs: Evaluating the influence of operation and sludge bacterial content on their odor impact10.1016/j.psep.2022.02.071 ↗
11. Landfill leachate treatment using a rotating biological contactor and an upward-flow anaerobic sludge bed reactor10.1016/j.wasman.2006.08.003 ↗
12. The biological treatment method for landfill leachate10.1051/e3sconf/202020206006 ↗
13. Efficiency of nitrification and organics removal from municipal landfill leachate in the rotating biological contactor (RBC)10.5004/dwt.2011.2617 ↗
14. Treatment of synthetic leachate by rotating biological contactor: A review10.22214/ijraset.2019.9139 ↗
15. Dynamics of a microbial biofilm in a rotating biological contactor for the treatment of winery effluent
16. Use of a rotating biological contactor for appropriate technology wastewater treatment
17. Rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment—A review10.1016/j.psep.2014.07.003 ↗
18. Modeling and experimentation for novel aerofoil embedded mesh disk-based partially submerged rotating reactor10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100382 ↗
19. Cheng, H., Li, W., Gong, Z., Wen, C., Zhang, C., and Lu, X. (2025). Treatment performance and characteristics of biofilm carriers in an aerobic waterwheel-driven rotating biological contactor. Water, 17.10.3390/w17030356 ↗
20. Irfan, M., Waqas, S., Arshad, U., Khan, J.A., Legutko, S., Kruszelnicka, I., Kramarczyk, D.G., Rahman, S., and Skrzypczak, A. (2022). Response surface methodology and ANN modelling of membrane rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15051932 ↗
21. Waqas, S., Bilad, M.R., Huda, N., Harun, N.Y., Nordin, N., Shamsuddin, N., Wibisono, Y., Khan, A.L., and Roslan, J. (2021). Membrane filtration as post-treatment of rotating biological contactor for wastewater treatment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137287 ↗
22. Yan, Z., and Pei, Z. (2024). Light enables partial nitrification and algal-bacterial consortium in rotating biological contactors performance and microbial community. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135538 ↗
23. Cheng, L., Deng, G., Zhang, C., Yang, Y., Abdelfattah, A., Eltawab, R., and Jia, H. (2024). Enhanced low-energy chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal in aeration-free conditions through pulse-rotating bio-contactors enriched with glycogen-accumulating organisms. Water, 16.10.3390/w16101417 ↗
24. Ucar, A., Karakose, M., and Kirimça, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020898 ↗
25. Waqas, S., Harun, N.Y., Sambudi, N.S., Bilad, M.R., Abioye, K.J., Ali, A., and Abdulrahman, A. (2023). A Review of Rotating Biological Contactors for Wastewater Treatment. Water, 15.10.3390/w15101913 ↗