Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natural Carbon Sinks Through a Temperature-Dependent Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Articles have recently been circulating in the media around the world, claiming that natural CO2 sinks have “suddenly and unexpectedly” ceased to function. It turned out that these articles were based on a single preprint of a meanwhile published article. Its reasoning is essentially based on the large spike of CO2 concentration growth in 2023 despite constant anthropogenic emissions. However, there are no obvious indications that photosynthesis or oceanic sinks have decreased. In this paper, it is shown that besides the natural sink systems of the land plants and oceans, the variability of natural emissions has to be considered. Based on a previous publication, it is made evident that natural emissions are temperature-dependent. Therefore, the careful analysis of monthly sea surface temperature and CO2-concentration data for 2023 and 2024 gives a consistent explanation for the rise in atmospheric carbon concentration growth without referring to the implausible hypothesis of failing carbon sinks. The temperature dependence of natural CO2 emissions indicates a clear causality from temperature to CO2 concentration. This is confirmed by the time shift between temperature and the subsequent concentration change. This suggests a new component in climate models with implications for climate policies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate variability and models · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Independent Researcher, Reichensteinstr. 54, D-69151 Neckargemünd, Germany
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Global Carbon Budget 2024
2. Low latency carbon budget analysis reveals a large decline of the land carbon sink in 202310.1093/nsr/nwae367 ↗
3. The Impact of Recent Climate Change on the Global Ocean Carbon Sink10.1029/2023GL107030 ↗
4. Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink10.1038/s43017-023-00456-3 ↗
5. Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020 ↗
6. Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake10.1038/s41586-024-08050-3 ↗
7. ENSO Impact on the Declining CO2 Sink Rate10.33140/JMSRO.06.04.03 ↗
8. Engelbeen, F., Hannon, R., and Burton, D. (2025, June 15). The Human Contribution to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Available online: https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Human-Contribution-to-Atmospheric-CO2-digital-compressed.pdf.10.31219/osf.io/het6n ↗
9. Engelbeen, F. (2025, June 15). The Origin of the Increase of CO2 in the Atmosphere. Available online: http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/co2_origin.html.
10. Dengler, J. (2024). Improvements and Extension of the Linear Carbon Sink Model. Atmosphere, 15.10.20944/preprints202404.1980.v1 ↗
11. NOAA (2025, June 15). Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/data.html.
12. An ensemble data set of sea-surface temperature change from 1850: The Met Office1 Hadley Centre HadSST.4.0.0.0 data set10.1029/2018JD029867 ↗
13. Atmospheric Radiocarbon for the Period 1950–201910.1017/RDC.2021.95 ↗
14. Dengler, J., and Reid, J. (2023). Emissions and CO2 Concentration—An Evidence Based Approach. Atmosphere, 14.10.20944/preprints202302.0393.v1 ↗
15. Dietze, P. (2025, June 15). Carbon Model Calculations. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20250305084230/http://www.john-daly.com/dietze/cmodcalc.htm.
16. Halparin, A. (2025, June 15). Simple Equation of Multi-Decadal Atmospheric Carbon Concentration Change. Available online: https://defyccc.com/docs/se/MDACC-Halperin.pdf.
17. Oceans’ surface pH-value as an example of a reversible natural response to an anthropogenic perturbation10.17352/ams.000036 ↗
18. A simple model for the prediction of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, depending on global CO2 emissions10.1088/1361-6404/ad230d ↗
19. Seabold, S., and Perktold, J. (July, January 28). Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
20. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
21. Meacham-Hensold, K. (2025, June 15). The Difference Between C3 and C4 Plants. Available online: https://ripe.illinois.edu/blog/difference-between-c3-and-c4-plants.
22. Higher than expected CO2 fertilization inferred from leaf to global observations10.1111/gcb.14950 ↗
23. The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008 ↗
24. Comment on “The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature” by Humlum, Stordahl and Solheim10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.03.011 ↗
25. El Nin˜o/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext)10.1002/joc.2336 ↗
26. Radiocarbon Concentration in Modern Wood10.1126/science.122.3166.415.b ↗
27. 25 Years of Tropospheric 14C Observations in Central Europe10.1017/S0033822200006895 ↗
28. Discussion Reporting of 14C Data10.1017/S0033822200003672 ↗
29. Atmospheric14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux variability10.1016/0012-821X(81)90040-6 ↗
30. Burton, D.A. (2025, June 15). Comment on Stallinga, P. (2023), Residence Time vs. Adjustment Time of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/brdq9_v2.10.31219/osf.io/brdq9_v2 ↗
31. Graven, H., Keeling, R.F., and Rogelj, J. (2020). Changes to Carbon Isotopes in Atmospheric CO2 Over the Industrial Era and Into the Future. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 34.10.1029/2019GB006170 ↗
32. Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 199910.1126/science.1082750 ↗
33. Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 200910.1126/science.1192666 ↗
34. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record10.1038/nature08930 ↗
35. Global spatiotemporal distribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database10.5194/bg-12-4121-2015 ↗
36. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change10.1038/nature04514 ↗
37. Seasonal variation of CO2 and nutrients in the high-latitude surface oceans: A comparative study10.1029/93GB02263 ↗
38. Brownlee, J. (2025, June 15). How to Identify and Remove Seasonality from Time Series Data with Python. Available online: https://machinelearningmastery.com/time-series-seasonality-with-python/.