journal article·2025-06-17Open access

Robust Bi-Objective Optimization and Dynamic Modeling of Hydropneumatic Suspension Unit Considering Real Gas Effects

Di Sun, Moonsuk Chang, Jinho Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

Vehicles are now rapidly transitioning from a conventional torsion bar suspension to an in-arm suspension unit (ISU), reflecting the growing industrial demand for more compact, high-performance systems. Although the ISU system can adapt well to rough terrain, the side forces produced when the piston moves can affect its reliability. Current models built on ideal gas assumptions fail to describe the complex nonlinear behavior of nitrogen under extreme pressure and temperature variations. This study incorporates the Beattie–Bridgeman real-gas equation into a dynamic force-displacement model to overcome this limitation. Furthermore, a bi-objective optimization strategy was devised that simultaneously minimizes the side forces and enhances acceleration stability across diverse environmental conditions. The optimized design based on a metamodel and a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm resulted in an 81.4% reduction in peak lateral forces and a 53.3% improvement in acceleration robustness, which marks a significant increase in suspension system durability. These findings not only advance ISU design methodologies but also offer viable solutions to existing reliability challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 712-749, Gyeongbuk-do, Republic of Korea

Dong Won Precision Co., Ltd., Changwon-si 137-717, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea

Funding

2025 Yeungnam University Research Grant

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. “Wheels vs. Tracks”—A Fundamental Evaluation from the Traction Perspective10.1016/j.jterra.2004.08.003 ↗
2. Dindorf, R. (2025). Comprehensive review comparing the development and challenges in the energy performance of pneumatic and hydropneumatic suspension systems. Energies, 18.10.3390/en18020427 ↗
3. Modeling and analysis of the vibration characteristics of a new type of in-arm hydropneumatic suspension of a tracked vehicle10.21595/jve.2016.16800 ↗
4. Optimization of maintenance plan for armored vehicle In-armed suspension unit (ISU) based on field data and reliability-centered maintenance10.33162/JAR.2024.3.24.1.075 ↗
5. Dynamic Modelling of an Off-Road Vehicle for the Design of a Semi-Active, Hydropneumatic Spring-Damper System10.1080/00423114.1999.12063112 ↗
6. Study on Damping Characteristics of Hydropneumatic Suspension Unit of Tracked Vehicle10.1007/BF03184736 ↗
7. Qin, B., Zeng, R., Li, X., and Yang, J. (2021). Design and Performance Analysis of the Hydropneumatic Suspension System for a Novel Road-Rail Vehicle. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052221 ↗
8. Design and Test of Hydro-Pneumatic ISD Suspension in Heavy Multi-Axle Vehicles10.1177/16878140211064737 ↗
9. Viadero-Monasterio, F., Meléndez-Useros, M., Jiménez-Salas, M., and Boada, B.L. (2024). Robust Static Output Feedback Control of a Semi-Active Vehicle Suspension Based on Magnetorheological Dampers. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210336 ↗
10. Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling and Analysis of Magnetorheological Semi-Active Suspension for Tracked Vehicles10.1016/j.apm.2023.09.027 ↗
11. Vibration Control of Vehicle ISD Suspension Based on the Fractional-Order SH-GH Stragety10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112880 ↗
12. Comparison of different gas models to calculate the spring force of a hydropneumatic suspension10.1016/j.jterra.2014.11.002 ↗
13. New Developments in Predicting and Modifying the Performance of Hydraulic Accumulators
14. An Algorithm for Computing Nonflow Gas Processes in Gas Springs and Hydropneumatic Accumulators10.1115/1.3140714 ↗
15. Min. Multi-objective optimisation of hydro-pneumatic suspension with gas–oil emulsion for heavy-duty vehicles10.1080/00423114.2019.1609050 ↗
16. Optimal Parameter Identification of Hydro-Pneumatic Suspension for Mine Cars10.1051/smdo/2024022 ↗
17. Hydro-Gas Suspension System for a Tracked Vehicle: Modeling and Analysis10.1016/j.jterra.2010.12.001 ↗
18. Qiao, C., Wen, H., Liu, X., and Wang, G. (2021). Damping control and experiment on active hydro-pneumatic suspension of sprayer based on genetic algorithm optimization. Front. Neurorobot., 15.10.3389/fnbot.2021.707390 ↗
19. Optimization design of the hydro-pneumatic suspension system for high clearance self-propelled sprayer using improved MOPSO algorithm
20. The Ride Comfort vs. Handling Compromise for off-Road Vehicles10.1016/j.jterra.2007.05.001 ↗
21. A new equation of state for fluids. I. Application to gaseous ethyl ether and carbon dioxide110.1021/ja01406a005 ↗
22. A New Equation of State for Fluids. II. Application to Helium, Neon, Argon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Air and Methane10.1021/ja01399a001 ↗
23. Zhu, X., Guan, J., Liu, Z., Li, Y., and Yang, R. (2024, January 28–31). Fuzzy PID control of single chamber semi active hydro-pneumatic suspension based on GA optimization. Proceedings of the 2024 43rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Kunming, China.10.23919/CCC63176.2024.10661756 ↗
24. Sun, H., Li, R., Xu, J., Xu, F., Zhang, B., and Dong, X. (2021). Fractional modeling and characteristic analysis of hydro-pneumatic suspension for construction vehicles. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9081414 ↗
25. Performance and optimization of the hydropneumatic suspension of high-speed wheeled excavators
26. A New Approach to Controlling an Active Suspension System Based on Reinforcement Learning
27. Multi-performance analyses and design optimisation of hydro-pneumatic suspension system for an articulated frame-steered vehicle10.1080/00423114.2018.1453079 ↗
28. Heat Transfer Effects on Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems10.1016/S0022-4898(99)00012-9 ↗
29. Zhang, L., Waza Muluken, T., and Dong, E. (2019, January 27–29). Robust Optimization Design of Suspension System Based on Spatial Structure. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer Network, Electronic and Automation (ICCNEA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICCNEA.2019.00093 ↗
30. Shape optimization for the stability and lightweighting of the upper sliding rail of an automotive monopost seat10.1007/s12239-024-00080-0 ↗
31. Development of system characteristic optimization method to achieve vehicle target performance10.1007/s12239-024-00022-w ↗
32. (2024). Experimental analysis of vacuum membrane dehumidifier: Hollow fiber module designs and dehumidification performance. Appl. Therm. Eng., 236, 121848.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121848 ↗
33. A Sequential Optimal Latin Hypercube Design Method Using an Efficient Recursive Permutation Evolution Algorithm10.1080/0305215X.2022.2148665 ↗
34. Katamesh, N.S., Abbas, A.E.F., and Mahmoud, S.A. (2024). Four Chemometric Models Enhanced by Latin Hypercube Sampling Design for Quantification of Anti-COVID Drugs: Sustainability Profiling through Multiple Greenness, Carbon Footprint, Blueness, and Whiteness Metrics. BMC Chem., 18.10.1186/s13065-024-01158-7 ↗
35. Xu, Z., Xia, D., Yong, N., Wang, J., Lin, J., Wang, F., Xu, S., and Ge, D. (2023). Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization for High-Dimensional Latin Hypercube Design Problem. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127066 ↗
36. Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations10.1007/PL00007198 ↗
37. Park, K.-B. (2016). An Efficient Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Constrained Global Optimization Problems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Hanyang University].
38. Yepes-Bellver, L., Brun-Izquierdo, A., Alcalá, J., and Yepes, V. (2024). Artificial Neural Network and Kriging Surrogate Model for Embodied Energy Optimization of Prestressed Slab Bridges. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16198450 ↗