journal article·2025-06-16Open access

Fluid–Structure Interaction Study in Unconventional Energy Horizontal Wells Driven by Recursive Algorithm and MPS Method

Xikun Gao, Dajun Zhao, Yi Zhang, Yong Chen, Zhanzhao Gao, Xiaojiao Zhang, Shengda Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

With the unconventional energy sector (e.g., shale gas) increasingly focused on precision drilling and cost-effective extraction, slim-hole horizontal well technology is gaining prominence. However, drill string dynamics in narrow, complex fluid environments are not fully understood. This study presents a novel bidirectional fluid–structure interaction (FSI) model, uniquely integrating recursive algorithms with the Moving Particle Semi-implicit (MPS) method to couple drill string–wellbore contact with drilling fluid interactions. Key findings show that drilling fluid significantly impacts drill string behavior; for instance, it can reduce natural frequencies by 20–25%, while stiff formations amplify lateral resonance risks. Optimizing fluid properties can substantially cut energy losses, though TREE is marginally elevated when viscosity exceeds the threshold (2.5 × 10−5 m2/s). The drill string typically displaces rightward, but higher viscosity can shift it left; a moderate friction coefficient aids centering. Excessive lateral displacement impairs cuttings removal, affecting fracturing. These insights enable actionable strategies: adjusting fluid viscosity and drag reducers can optimize drill string position and enhance cleaning. This research provides a framework for energy-efficient drilling in complex reservoirs, balancing efficiency with wellbore integrity and improving outcomes in the unconventional energy sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Oil and Gas Production Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China

State Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Exploration and Imaging, College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China

Provincial and Ministerial Co-Construction of Collaborative Innovation Center for Shale Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China

Jilin Provincial Coalfield Geology Bureau, Siping 136000, China

CRRC Dalian Co., Ltd., Dalian 116000, China

Funding

Key Special Project of the National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Sabanov, S., Qureshi, A.R., Dauitbay, Z., and Kurmangazy, G. (2023). A Method for the Modified Estimation of Oil Shale Mineable Reserves for Shale Oil Projects: A Case Study. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16165853 ↗
2. Analysis of Cuttings Transport in Small-Bore Horizontal Wells Considering Drill String Eccentricity10.1002/ese3.70088 ↗
3. Modeling of drill string dynamics in directional wells for real-time simulation10.1177/00375497231175927 ↗
4. Nonlinear rotordynamics of a drillstring in curved wells: Models and numerical techniques10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105225 ↗
5. Liu, Y., Niu, Y., Guan, Z., and Lyu, S. (2022). The review and development of devices with an increasing rate of penetration (ROP) in deep formation drilling based on drill string vibration. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15197377 ↗
6. Dynamic Behavior of a Drill-String: Experimental Investigation of Lateral Instabilities10.1115/1.2888180 ↗
7. Tchomeni Kouejou, B.X., Sozinando, D.F., and Anyika Alugongo, A. (2023). Modeling and Analysis of Drill String–Casing Collision under the Influence of Inviscid Fluid Forces. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063557 ↗
8. Nonlinear vibrations of composite drill strings considering drill string–wellbore contact and bit–rock interaction10.1007/s00419-022-02198-y ↗
9. A comparative review of modelling and controlling torsional vibrations and experimentation using laboratory setups10.1016/j.petrol.2013.11.008 ↗
10. How to mathematically model a drill-string: Lumped or continuous models?10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115543 ↗
11. Bembenek, M., Grydzhuk, Y., Gajdzik, B., Ropyak, L., Pashechko, M., Slabyi, O., Al-Tanakchi, A., and Pryhorovska, T. (2024). An analytical–numerical model for determining “drill string–wellbore” frictional interaction forces. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17020301 ↗
12. Heisig, G., and Neubert, M. (2000, January 23). Lateral Drillstring Vibrations in Extended-Reach Wells. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2118/59235-MS ↗
13. Simulation of drill-string systems with fluid–structure and contact interactions in realistic geometries10.1007/s00466-024-02555-4 ↗
14. Chodankar, A.D., and Seibi, A. (2019, January 11–14). Effects of axial compression load, borehole clearance, and contact force using axial-lateral fluid coupled drill string vibration model. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1115/IMECE2019-10783 ↗
15. Component-based modeling and simulation of nonlinear drill-string dynamics10.1115/1.4052676 ↗
16. Mitigation of negative damping effects in deep drilling operations through active control10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119078 ↗
17. Design of a sliding mode controller for suppressing coupled axial & torsional vibrations in horizontal drill strings using Extended Kalman Filter10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118477 ↗
18. Ejike, C., Abid, K., and Teodoriu, C. (2025). Scaling Torsional Drilling Vibrations: A Simulation-Based Comparison of Downscale and Upscale Drill Strings Under Varying Torque Conditions. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15052399 ↗
19. Model development of torsional drillstring and investigating parametrically the stick-slips influencing factors10.1115/1.4007915 ↗
20. Semi-analytical dynamic modeling and fluid-structure interaction analysis of L-shaped pipeline10.1016/j.tws.2023.111485 ↗
21. Efficient modal dynamic analysis of flexible beam–fluid systems10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.061 ↗
22. On the stability of rotating pipes conveying fluid in annular liquid medium10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115891 ↗
23. Dynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of an offshore drilling tube system with pipe-in-pipe structure10.1016/j.apor.2018.03.010 ↗
24. Hydrodynamic mass and damping of horizontal tubes subjected to internal two-phase flow10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117004 ↗
25. Dynamics of rotating conveying mud drill string subjected to torque and longitudinal thrust10.1007/s11012-013-9733-8 ↗
26. Fujita, K., and Moriasa, A. (2015, January 19–23). Stability of cantilevered pipes subjected to internal flow and external annular axial flow simultaneously. Proceedings of the Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.1115/PVP2015-45141 ↗
27. Dynamics of a long tubular cantilever conveying fluid downwards, which then flows upwards around the cantilever as a confined annular flow10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.07.004 ↗
28. Analysis of Friction-Induced Limit Cycling in an Experimental Drill-String System
29. Nonlinear dynamics of directional drilling with fluid and borehole interactions10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114924 ↗
30. Predicting the pressure losses while the drillstring is buckled and rotating using artificial intelligence methods10.1016/j.jngse.2018.05.028 ↗
31. Effects of tribological properties of water-based drilling fluids on buckling and lock-up length of coiled tubing in drilling operations10.1016/j.triboint.2014.01.028 ↗
32. Clay nanoparticles modified drilling fluids for drilling of deep hydrocarbon wells10.1016/j.clay.2013.10.017 ↗
33. Improved stiff string torque and drag prediction using a computationally efficient contact algorithm10.1080/13873954.2024.2348152 ↗
34. Nonlinear integrated dynamic analysis of drill strings under stick-slip vibration10.1016/j.apor.2020.102521 ↗
35. Axial-torsional coupling vibration model and nonlinear behavior of drill string system in oil and gas wells10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108560 ↗
36. The effects of drilling mud and weight bit on stability and vibration of a drill string10.1115/1.4005033 ↗
37. Stability of transverse vibration of drillstring conveying drilling fluid10.15632/jtam-pl/127391 ↗
38. Influence of drilling mud rheology on the reduction of vertical vibrations in deep rotary drilling10.1016/j.petrol.2015.09.016 ↗
39. A Coupled Fluid-Structure Model for Estimation of Hydraulic Forces on the Drill-Pipes10.1115/1.4064614 ↗
40. Effect of drilling fluid hydraulics on drill stem vibrations10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.041 ↗
41. Influence of non-Newton rheological parameters of drilling fluid on axial-lateral-torsional coupling vibration of rotating drill string10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212415 ↗
42. Whirling dynamics of a drill-string with fluid–structure interaction10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212423 ↗
43. Rigid-flexible coupling multi-body dynamics modeling of a semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114648 ↗
44. SuRFR: A fast recursive simulator for soft manipulators with discrete joints on SE (3)10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105589 ↗
45. Multibody dynamics in computational mechanics and engineering applications10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.024 ↗
46. Dynamics and control of a spatial rigid-flexible multibody system with multiple cylindrical clearance joints10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.01.016 ↗
47. A new elastohydrodynamic lubricated spherical joint model for rigid-flexible multibody dynamics10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.09.006 ↗
48. Dynamic modeling and error analysis of planar flexible multilink mechanism with clearance and spindle-bearing structure10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.09.023 ↗
49. Multi-physics field coupling interface lubrication contact analysis for gear transmission under various finishing processes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108742 ↗
50. Implementation of Hertz theory and validation of a finite element model for stress analysis of gear drives with localized bearing contact10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.01.014 ↗
51. An adhesive wear prediction method for double helical gears based on enhanced coordinate transformation and generalized sliding distance model10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.05.010 ↗
52. Curvature-based framework for contact analysis of complex tooth surfaces10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110147 ↗
53. A comprehensive mesh stiffness model for heavy-duty spiral bevel gear pair based on design and manufacturing collaboration10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2025.106005 ↗
54. Establishment of theoretical model and dynamic analysis of gear meshing force for the multi-gear driving system considering the effect of friction10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109382 ↗
55. Virtual Simulation Analysis of Rigid-Flexible Coupling Dynamics of Shearer with Clearance10.1155/2018/6179054 ↗
56. A combined experimental and computational study of lubrication mechanism of high precision reducer adopting a worm gear drive with complicated space surface contact10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106261 ↗
57. Application of a moving particle semi-implicit numerical wave flume (MPS-NWF) to model design waves10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.104066 ↗
58. Multi-resolution MPS for incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions in ocean engineering10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.020 ↗
59. An advanced moving particle semi-implicit method for accurate and stable simulation of incompressible flows10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.005 ↗
60. Bazaluk, O., Velychkovych, A., Ropyak, L., Pashechko, M., Pryhorovska, T., and Lozynskyi, V. (2021). Influence of heavy weight drill pipe material and drill bit manufacturing errors on stress state of steel blades. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14144198 ↗
61. Determination of the thermal state of a block gravel filter during its transportation along the borehole10.33271/mining17.04.075 ↗