journal article·2025-06-15Open access

A Practical Quantitative Tool Based on the EXCASS System for the Use of Hoek-Brown’s Disturbance Factor in Slope Excavations

Gulseren Dagdelenler, Harun Sonmez

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

The disturbance factor (D) in the Hoek–Brown criterion quantifies excavation-induced rock mass disturbance. Although D is conceptually defined as a continuous parameter ranging from 0 to 1, the most recent Hoek–Brown guidelines provide descriptions only for boundary conditions related to slopes and tunnels. In slope excavations, the degree of disturbance is governed not only by the excavation method but also by the thickness of the removed overburden, with its influence becoming particularly significant in deep excavations. In recent years, the concept of a transitional disturbance factor, varying with depth from the excavation surface, has gained increasing attention. To address this need, the EXCASS system, an empirical method for selecting appropriate excavation techniques based on the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and point load strength (Is50) values, was integrated into the transitional disturbance factor framework in this study. EXCASS allows for the selection of stronger or weaker excavation methods, offering flexibility to control the degree of disturbance induced in the rock mass. Moreover, the disturbance factor at the excavation surface was determined by incorporating both the operational excavation power index and the thickness of the removed overburden. This integrated approach enables a more realistic evaluation of excavation-induced damage in slope stability analyses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800 Ankara, Türkiye

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Hudson, J.A. (1992). Modified Hoek-Brown criterion for jointed rock masses. Proc. Rock Characterization, Symp. International Society of Rock Mechanic Eurock, Thomas Telford Publishing.
2. Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K., and Bawden, W.F. (1995). Support of Underground Excavation in Hard Rock, Balkema.
3. Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C.T., and Corkum, B. (2002, January 7–10). Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion—2002 Edition. Proceedings of the 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, ON, Canada.
4. Hoek, E., and Brown, E.T. (1988, January 3–4). The Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion a 1988 Update. Proceedings of the 15th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, ON, Canada.
5. Modifications to the geological strength index (GSI) and their applicability to stability of slopes10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00043-1 ↗
6. The Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion and GSI—2018 Edition10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001 ↗
7. Improving the Hoek–Brown criterion based on the disturbance factor and geological strength index quantification10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.06.004 ↗
8. Estimating the geological strength index and disturbance factor in the Hoek–Brown criterion using the acoustic wave velocity in the rock mass10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106745 ↗
9. A flexible system for selection of rock mass excavation method10.1007/s10064-020-01877-w ↗
10. Read, S.A.L., Richards, L.R., and Perrin, N.D. (1999, January 25–28). Applicability of the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion to New Zealand Greywacke Rocks. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris, France.
11. José, M., Galera, M., Alvarez, Z., and Bieniawski, T. (2005, January 22–24). Evaluation of the deformation modulus of rock masses: Comparison of pressuremeter and dilatometer tests with RMR prediction. Proceedings of the ISP5-PRESSIO 2005 International Symposium; Organization: Geocontrol, S.A.-UPM, Madrid, Spain.
12. Hoek, E., and Bray, J.W. (1981). Rock Slope Engineering. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Stephen Austin and Sons. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781482267099 ↗
13. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classification, Wiley.
14. Hammah, R.E., Yacoub, T.E., Corkum, B.C., and Curran, J.H. (2005, January 25–29). The Shear Strength Reduction Method for the Generalized Hoek-Brown Criterion. Proceedings of 40th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (ARMA/USRMS 05-810), Anchorage, Alaska.
15. Singh, B., and Goel, R.K. (2011). Engineering Rock Mass Classification, Elsevier Inc. Publication.10.1016/B978-0-12-385878-8.00006-9 ↗
16. Dagdelenler, G. (2025). Impact of Rock Mass Strength Anisotropy with Depth on Slope Stability Under Excavation Disturbance. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010164 ↗
17. Rose, N.D., Scholz, M., Burden, J., King, M., Maggs, C., and Havaej, M. (2018, January 10–13). Quantifying transitional rock mass disturbance in open pit slopes related to mining excavation. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Energy and Mineral Resources, Seville, Spain.
18. Impact of spatially varying rock disturbance on rock slope stability10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.08.014 ↗
19. A complementary approach to quantify the basic GSI chart considering scale effect on rock structure10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.029 ↗
20. Hustralid, W.A., McCarter, M.K., and van Zyl, D.J.A. (2000). Rock Mass Properties for Surface Mines. Slope Stability in Surface Mining, Society for Mining, Metallurgical and Exploration (SME).
21. Sonmez, H., and Osman, B. (2008, January 24–28). The Limitations of Point Load Index for Predicting of Strength of Rock Material and a New. Proceedings of the 61st Geological Congress of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.