A Prototype Mechatronic Device for Upper Limb Rehabilitation and Analysis of Its Functionality
Source abstract
Abstract
A prototype device was developed as a simple yet effective tool for the rehabilitation of individuals with upper limb paresis resulting from stroke. The primary objective of the design process was to create a portable rehabilitation device that could be remotely controlled by a therapist via a Bluetooth protocol. The device enables the execution of upper limb rehabilitation exercises and integrates essential modules for assessment, reporting, and user feedback (biofeedback). It comprises a base and three movable arms, each fitted with a container at its distal end. The central arm, positioned at the midpoint of the device’s housing, holds a storage container from which specific objects are retrieved by the user. This arm features an adjustable reach. The remaining two arms are equipped with task-specific containers mounted at their ends. The conceptual framework is based on the execution of various tasks displayed on a screen. The user retrieves objects from the central storage unit and places them into either the left or right container, as indicated. The target container is highlighted both visually on the screen and via an illuminated LED indicator. Pre-programmed sequences for object retrieval and placement are presented on the display, offering clear guidance for the correct positioning and ordering of blocks within the designated containers. The device includes 12 dedicated blocks varying in shape, colour, material, and texture. A mechatronic control system governs the container positioning and arm inclination, enabling a precise adjustment of range of movement according to the exercise’s requirements. A dedicated software system has also been developed for control and management. Functional testing of the prototype was conducted to assess the device’s effectiveness and practical applicability in rehabilitation settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Motor Control and Adaptation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Mechanics and Robotics, The Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
Funding
Podkarpackie Centre for Innovation in Rzeszów · European Regional Development Fund
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Global Burden of Stroke10.1055/s-0038-1649503 ↗
2. (2025, April 23). Available online: https://www.world-stroke.org/.
3. Kwolek, A. (2003). Medical Rehabilitation, Elsevier Urban & Partner. [2nd ed.]. (In Polish).
4. Stroke incidence, case fatality and mortality—Current trends and future prognosis
5. Quality of life of post-stroke patients10.2478/sjph-2022-0014 ↗
6. Siger, A. (2024). The Situation of People After Stroke in Poland—A Report of the Stroke Foundation, The Stroke Foundation. Available online: https://fum.info.pl/raport_osoby_po_udarze_e.pdf.
7. Stroke Association (2023). What We Think About: Rehabilitation. Rebuilding Lives After Stroke, Stroke Association. Available online: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/new_pdfs_2019/our_policy_position/rehabilitation_policy_position.pdf.
8. Global and regional bur den of stroke during 1990–2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 201010.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4 ↗
9. Lifetime risk of stroke and dementia: Current concepts, and estimates from the framingham study10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70291-0 ↗
10. Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602615 ↗
11. National Center for Health Statistics (2024, December 10). Health, United States, 2011: With Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus11.pdf.
12. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): A case-control study10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3 ↗
13. Sex differences in stroke: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70193-5 ↗
14. Sex-related differences in effects of progesterone following neonatal hypoxic brain injury10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.005 ↗
15. Shahid, J., Kashif, A., and Kashif-Shahid, M. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Physical Therapy Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation: Impairment-Based Approaches and Functional Goals. Brain Sci., 13.10.3390/brainsci13050717 ↗
16. Projected Global Trends in Ischemic Stroke Incidence, Deaths and Disability-Adjusted Life Years From 2020 to 203010.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073 ↗
17. Projections of the Stroke Burden at the Global, Regional, and National Levels up to 2050 Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 202110.1161/JAHA.124.036142 ↗
18. WHO (2025, April 20). Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident. Available online: https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/stroke-cerebrovascular-accident/index.html.
19. American Heart Association (2025, April 17). Stroke Symptoms. Available online: https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/stroke-symptoms.
20. Andersson, J., Rejnö, Å., Jakobsson, S., Hansson, P.-O., Nielsen, S.J., and Björck, L. (2024). Symptoms at stroke onset as described by patients: A qualitative study. BMC Neurol., 24.10.1186/s12883-024-03658-4 ↗
21. Post-stroke Movement Disorders: Clinical Spectrum, Pathogenesis, and Management10.4103/0028-3886.314574 ↗
22. The relationship between spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and balance in individuals with chronic stroke10.1123/jab.2012-0208 ↗
23. Reliability of spatiotemporal asymmetry during overground walking for individuals following chronic stroke10.1097/NPT.0b013e318227fe70 ↗
24. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014 ↗
25. Disturbances of spatial reference frame and postural asymmetry after a chronic stroke10.1007/s00221-018-5308-1 ↗
26. Hatem, S.M., Saussez, G., Della-Faille, M., Prist, V., Zhang, X., Dispa, D., and Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016). Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 ↗
27. Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework10.1177/23969873231191304 ↗
28. Lee, K.E., Choi, M., and Jeoung, B. (2022). Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Exercise in Improving Physical Function of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph191912739 ↗
29. Clinical Evidence of Exercise Benefits for Stroke10.1007/978-981-10-4304-8_9 ↗
30. Chen, K., Zhu, S., Tang, Y., Lan, F., and Liu, Z. (2024). Advances in balance training to prevent falls in stroke patients: A scoping review. Front. Neurol., 15.10.3389/fneur.2024.1167954 ↗
31. Effectiveness of Activity-Based Task-Oriented Training on Upper Extremity Recovery for Adults with Stroke: A Systematic Review10.5014/ajot.2024.050391 ↗
32. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation10.1186/1743-0003-11-3 ↗
33. The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0 ↗
34. Robotic Techniques for Upper Limb Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848352 ↗
35. Milella, A., Di Paola, D., and Cicirelli, G. (2010). Application of Robotic and Mechatronic Systems to Neurorehabilitation. Mechatronic Systems Applications, IntechOpen. [1st ed.].10.5772/206 ↗
36. Banyai, A.D., and Brisan, C. (2024). Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review. Healthcare, 12.10.20944/preprints202406.2007.v1 ↗
37. Exploring the import of mechatronics engineering in medicine: A review10.1186/s43088-025-00618-w ↗
38. HandCARE: A cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2010347 ↗
39. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study10.1002/ana.23879 ↗
40. A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy on patient with spastic hemiparesis10.1097/01.mrr.0000230050.16604.d9 ↗
41. The exoskeletons are here10.1186/1743-0003-6-17 ↗
42. Pignolo, L., Dolce, G., Basta, G., Lucca, L.F., Serra, S., and Sannitam, W.G. (2012, January 24–27). Upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. ARAMIS a ‘robo-mechatronic’ innovative approach and prototype. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy.10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290868 ↗
43. Frisoli, A., Borelli, L., Montagner, A., Marcheschi, S., Procopio, C., Salsedo, F., Bergamasco, M., and Carboncini, M.C. (2007, January 13–15). Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleton in virtual reality. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Robotics (ICORR), Noordwijk, The Netherlands.10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428491 ↗
44. The Changes in the hemodynamic activity of the brain in motor imagery as a result of training subjects to control a brain-computer interface
45. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 ↗
46. Rehabilitative and assistive wearable mechatronic upper-limb devices: A review
47. Just, F., Baur, K., Riener, R., Klamroth-Marganska, V., and Rauter, G. (2016, January 26–29). Online adaptive compensation of the ARMin Rehabilitation Robot. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on IEEE 2016, Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Singapore.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523716 ↗
48. Ren, H., Liu, T., and Wang, J. (2023). Design and Analysis of an Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot Based on Multimodal Control. Sensor, 23.10.3390/s23218801 ↗
49. Ventura, S., Tessari, A., Castaldini, S., Magni, E., Turolla, A., Baños, R., and Lullini, G. (2024). Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality rehabilitation in stroke patients with sensory-motor and proprioception upper limb deficit: A study protocol. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0307408 ↗
50. Ren, Y., Park, H.S., and Zhang, L.Q. (2009, January 23–26). Developing a whole-arm exoskeleton robot with hand opening and closing mechanism for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209482 ↗
51. Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG triggered therapy10.1109/TNSRE.2005.850423 ↗
52. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008 ↗
53. A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers: A case series in chronic and acute stroke patients10.1186/1743-0003-5-21 ↗
54. Frolov, A.A., Mokienko, O., Lyukmanov, R., Biryukova, E., Kotov, S., Turbina, L., Nadareyshvily, G., and Bushkova, Y. (2017). Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor-Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Front. Neurosci., 11.10.3389/fnins.2017.00400 ↗
55. A domestic robotic rehabilitation device for assessment of wrist function for outpatients
56. Forbrigger, S., DePaul, V.G., Davies, T.C., Morin, E., and Hashtrudi Zaad, K. (2023). Home based upper limb stroke rehabilitation mechatronics: Challenges and opportunities. Biomed. Eng., 22.10.1186/s12938-023-01133-8 ↗
57. Ruggiu, M., and Rea, P. (2022). Development of a Mechatronic System for the Mirror Therapy. Actuators, 11.10.3390/act11010014 ↗
58. Akshay, M., Latt, W.T., Tan, H.G., Tan, U.X., Shee, C.Y., and Ang, W.T. (2007, January 23–26). Design and implementation of a mechatronic device for wrist and elbow rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 1st International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology: In Conjunction with 1st Tan Tock Seng Hospital Neurorehabilitation Meeting i-CREATe ‘07, Singapore.10.1145/1328491.1328544 ↗
59. A Mechatronic Mirror-Image Motion Device for Symmetric Upper-Limb Rehabilitation10.1007/s12541-019-00310-x ↗
60. Averta, G., Abbinante, M., Orsini, P., Felici, F., Lippi, P., Bicchi, A., Catalano, M.G., and Bianchi, M. (2020, January 20–24). A novel mechatronic system for evaluating elbow muscular spasticity relying on Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold estimation. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176011 ↗
61. Cavallaro, E., and Keller, T. (2014). Portable Device for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. (8795207B2), U.S. Patent.
62. (2024, December 14). Bimeo: An Award-Winning, Sensor-Based, Arm Rehabilitation System. Available online: https://kinestica.com/bimeo.
63. (2024, December 14). Pablo: Functional Rehabilitation. Available online: https://tyromotion.com/en/products/pablo/.
64. (2024, December 14). Myro: Interactive and Task-Specific Therapy. Available online: https://tyromotion.com/en/products/myro.
65. Annett, M., Anderson, F., Goertzen, D., Halton, J., Bischof, Q.R.W.F., and Boulanger, P. (2009, January 23–27). Using a Multi-touch Tabletop for Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 (OZCHI ‘09), Melbourne Australia.10.1145/1738826.1738869 ↗
66. Effects of newly developed compact robot-aided upper extremity training system (Neuro-X®) in patients with stroke: A pilot study10.2340/16501977-2361 ↗
67. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, Y.-M., Koo, S.-W., Park, H.-B., and Yoon, Y.-S. (2023). Effects of Therapist Intervention during Upper-Extremity Robotic Rehabilitation in Patients with Stroke. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11101369 ↗
68. The effect of virtual reality applications on treatment outcomes in lower extremity rehabilitation: A systematic review10.5114/areh.2024.143256 ↗
69. Adaptive virtual reality-based training: A systematic literature review and framework10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w ↗
70. Evaluation of visual feedback techniques for virtual grasping with bare hands using Leap Motion and Oculus Rift10.1007/s10055-017-0313-4 ↗
71. A haptic feedback virtual reality system to improve the Box and Block Test (BBT) for upper extremity motor function assessment10.1007/s10055-022-00727-2 ↗
72. Concurrent Validity of a Virtual Version of Box and Block Test for Patients with Neurological Disorders10.4236/wjns.2020.101009 ↗
73. Concurrent validity of an immersive virtual reality version of the Box and Block Test to assess manual dexterity among patients with stroke10.1186/s12984-022-00981-0 ↗
74. Lackey, S., and Shumaker, R. (2016). Comparing objective and subjective metrics between physical and virtual tasks. Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Proceedings of the VAMR 2016, Toronto, Canada, 17–22 July 2016, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2 ↗
75. The Automated Box and Blocks Test an Autonomous Assessment Method of Gross Manual Dexterity in Stroke Rehabilitation
76. Oña, E.D., Jardón, A., Cuesta-Gómez, A., Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza, P., Canode-la-Cuerda, R., and Balaguer, C. (2020). Validity of a fully-immersive VR-based version of the box and blocks test for upper limb function assessment in Parkinson’s disease. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102773 ↗
77. Coordination of reach-to-grasp in physical and haptic-free virtual environments10.1186/s12984-019-0525-9 ↗
78. Oña, E.D., Balaguer, C., and Jardón, A. (2023). Automatic Cube Counting System for the Box and Blocks Test Using Proximity Sensors: Development and Validation. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12040914 ↗
79. Temehy, B., Rosewilliam, S., Alvey, G., and Soundy, A. (2022). Exploring Stroke Patients’ Needs after Discharge from Rehabilitation Centres: Meta-Ethnography. Behav. Sci., 12.10.3390/bs12100404 ↗
80. Factors that influence the adoption of rehabilitation technologies: A multi-disciplinary qualitative exploration10.1186/s12984-023-01194-9 ↗
81. Investigating the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) framework to capture user needs in the concept stage of rehabilitation technology development10.1080/10400435.2014.903315 ↗
82. Employing the international classification of functioning, disability and health framework to capture user feedback in the design and testing stage of development of home-based arm rehabilitation technology10.1080/10400435.2016.1140689 ↗
83. Perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice after stroke: A systematic mixed studies review10.1186/s12984-021-00819-1 ↗
84. Tutak, S., Mucha, J., Lew, L., and Jurka, M. (2021). Upper Limb Rehabilitation. (Office of the Republic of Poland PL244088), Device. Patent.
85. Openshaw, S., and Taylor, E. (2007). Ergonomics and Design A Reference Guide. DIANE Publishing Company.
86. The Aging human body shape10.1038/s41514-020-0043-9 ↗
87. Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00002-2 ↗
88. Pheasant, S., and Haslegrave, C.M. (2006). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work, CRC Press. [3rd ed.].
89. (2024, December 14). Anthropometric-Detailed-Data-Tables. Available online: https://multisite.eos.ncsu.edu/www-ergocenter-ncsu-edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2016/06/Anthropometric-Detailed-Data-Tables.pdf.
90. (2008). Safety of machinery—Human body measurements—Part 1: Principles for Determining the Dimensions Required for Openings for Whole Body Access into Machinery. Technical Committee CEN/TC 122 (Standard No. EN 547-1:1996+A1:2008).
91. (2008). Safety of Machinery—Human Body Measurements—Part 2: Principles for Determining the Dimensions Required for Access Openings. Technical Committee CEN/TC 122 (Standard No. EN 547-2:1996+A1:2008).
92. (2008). Safety of Machinery—Human Body Measurements—Part 3: Anthropometric Data. Technical Committee CEN/TC 122 (Standard No. EN 547-3:1996+A1:2008).
93. Saenen, L., Orban de Xivry, J.-J., and Verheyden, G. (2022). Development and Validation of a Novel Robot-Based Assessment of Upper Limb Sensory Processing in Chronic Stroke. Brain Sci., 12.10.3390/brainsci12081005 ↗
94. Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy10.1186/s12984-016-0178-x ↗
95. Quantifying Arm Nonuse in Individuals Poststroke10.1177/1545968312471904 ↗
96. Recognising a hand by grasp10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00049-X ↗
97. 3-D Finite-Element Models of Human and Monkey Fingertips to Investigate the Mechanics of Tactile Sense10.1115/1.1613673 ↗
98. Static friction properties between human palmar skin and five grabrail materials10.1080/00140130110074882 ↗
99. Object shape affects hand grip function for heavy objects in younger and older adults10.1080/00140139.2020.1865576 ↗
100. Improvement of hand function using different surfaces and identification of difficult movement post stroke in the Box and Block Test10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.014 ↗