journal article·2025-06-08Open access

Towards Geodetic Datum Modernization: A Comparative Study of GNSS Solutions in KGD2002 Using GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese

Seung-Jun Lee, Hong-Sik Yun

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

This study evaluates coordinate consistency in the static Korean Geodetic Datum 2002 (KGD2002) by comparing GNSS station positions derived independently from GAMIT/GLOBK and Bernese software. Using a nationwide network of approximately 3000 unified geodetic control points (UGCPs), we analyze horizontal coordinate differences (ΔN, ΔE) to identify regional patterns and potential systematic biases. The results indicate that both solutions are closely aligned with the official KGD2002 coordinates, generally within a few millimeters to sub-centimeter levels. However, small regional discrepancies are evident; for example, some provinces exhibit consistent mean northward or southward offsets on the order of 0.1–0.3 cm, and greater dispersions—up to 2 cm—are observed in peripheral regions such as Jeollanam. Notably, the Bernese solution demonstrates slightly tighter agreement, with lower standard deviations compared to GAMIT/GLOBK. The application of two distinct processing strategies within a unified static reference frame is a novel aspect of this study, revealing subtle differences attributable to network geometry, environmental factors, and software modeling approaches. The findings also underscore the limitations of KGD2002’s static nature, particularly its fixed epoch and lack of motion modeling. In response to these issues, this study discusses the rationale for transitioning to a dynamic geodetic reference frame, such as ITRF2020, to improve compatibility with international systems and account for ongoing crustal motions. Overall, the results provide a foundation for the future modernization of Korea’s spatial reference infrastructure and highlight the importance of adopting time-dependent datums in geodetic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GNSS positioning and interference · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. ITRF2014: A New Release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame Modeling Nonlinear Station Motions10.1002/2016JB013098 ↗
2. Impacts of Non-Linear ITRF2020 on Reference Frame Alignment10.1016/j.asr.2023.08.035 ↗
3. ITRF2020: An Augmented Reference Frame Refining the Modeling of Nonlinear Station Motions10.1007/s00190-023-01738-w ↗
4. Zhang, J., Huang, C., Lian, L., and Zhang, S. (2024). Assessment of the Improvement in Observation Precision of GNSS, SLR, VLBI, and DORIS Inputs from ITRF2014 to ITRF2020 Using TRF Stacking Methods. Remote Sens., 16.10.20944/preprints202402.0628.v1 ↗
5. Impact of Terrestrial Reference Frame Realizations on Altimetry Satellite Orbit Quality and Global and Regional Sea Level Trends: A Switch from ITRF2008 to ITRF201410.5194/se-10-293-2019 ↗
6. Blewitt, G. (2015). Terrestrial Reference Frame Requirements for Studies of Geodynamics and Climate Change. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer.10.1007/1345_2015_142 ↗
7. Delva, P., Altamimi, Z., Blazquez, A., Bonnor, J., Bouquillon, S., Capitaine, N., Cécile, L., Sośnica, K., and Wolf, P. (2022). GENESIS: Co-Location of Geodetic Techniques in Space. arXiv.
8. Evolution of NAD 83 in the United States: Journey from 2D toward 4D10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000083 ↗
9. Imakiire, T., and Murakami, M. (2002, January 4–7). Establishment of the New Geodetic Reference Frame of Japan (JGD2000). Proceedings of the IVS 2002 General Meeting, Tsukuba, Japan. Available online: https://ivscc.gsfc.nasa.gov/publications/gm2002/imakiire.pdf.
10. Geocentric Datum of Australia 2020: The First Australian Datum Developed from a Rigorous Continental-Scale Adjustment10.1080/14498596.2023.2184429 ↗
11. ITRF2000: A New Release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth Science Applications
12. Lee, Y.-J., Lee, H.-K., Jeong, K.-H., and Cha, S.-H. (2008, January 14–19). Korean Geodetic Datum 2002 (KGD2002): Nationwide GPS Network Densification. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2008, Stockholm, Sweden. Available online: https://fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2008/papers/ts03a/ts03a_02_lee_etal_2891.pdf.
13. Lee, S.-J., and Yun, H.-S. (2025). Nationwide Adjustment of Unified Geodetic Control Points for the Modernization of South Korea’s Spatial Reference Frame. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105500 ↗
14. PyRINEX: A New Multi-Purpose Python Package for GNSS RINEX Data10.7717/peerj-cs.1800 ↗
15. Herring, T.A., King, R.W., and McClusky, S.C. (2010). Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available online: http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/gg/docs/Intro_GG.pdf.
16. Herring, T.A., King, R.W., Floyd, M.A., and McClusky, S.C. (2018). GAMIT Reference Manual, GPS Analysis at MIT, Release 10.7, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available online: http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/gg/docs/GAMIT_Ref.pdf.
17. Herring, T.A., King, R.W., and McClusky, S.C. (2018). GLOBK Reference Manual, Global Kalman Filter VLBI and GPS Analysis Program, Release 10.7, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available online: http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/gg/docs/GLOBK_Ref.pdf.
18. King, R.W., and Bock, Y. (2003). Documentation for the GAMIT GPS Analysis Software, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Dach, R., Lutz, S., Walser, P., and Fridez, P. (2015). Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2—Documentation, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern. Available online: https://www.bernese.unibe.ch/docs/DOCU52.pdf.
20. Leick, A., Rapoport, L., and Tatarnikov, D. (2015). GPS Satellite Surveying, John Wiley & Sons. [4th ed.].10.1002/9781119018612 ↗
21. Why GPS Makes Distances Bigger Than They Are
22. Qiu, X., Sun, B., Li, Y., Ding, X., and Wang, L. (2022). Experimental Study of Accuracy of High-Rate GNSS in Context of Structural Health Monitoring. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14194989 ↗
23. Gillins, D., Heck, J., Scott, G., Jordan, K., and Hippenstiel, R. (2019, January 22–26). Accuracy of GNSS Observations from Three Real-Time Networks in Maryland, USA. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2019, Hanoi, Vietnam. Available online: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2019/papers/ts05e/TS05E_gillins_heck_et_al_10077.pdf.
24. A Comparative Analysis of GNSS Processing Services for Static Measurements: Evaluating Accuracy and Stability at Different Observation Periods
25. The 95% Confidence Interval for GNSS-Derived Site Velocities10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000390 ↗
26. Analysis of 20 Years of GPS Data from SWEREF Consolidation Points Using BERNESE and GAMIT-GLOBK Software
27. The Correlations of the Helmert Transformation Parameters as an Additional Auxiliary Diagnostic Tool for Terrestrial Reference Frames Quality Assessment
28. Determination of Helmert Transformation Parameters for Continuous GNSS Networks
29. UNAVCO (2025, May 17). GAGE Plate Motion Calculator. Available online: https://www.unavco.org/software/geodetic-utilities/plate-motion-calculator/plate-motion-calculator.html.
30. A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model10.1002/2014GC005407 ↗
31. Drewes, H. (2009). The Actual Plate Kinematic and Crustal Deformation Model APKIM2005 as Basis for a Non-Rotating ITRF. Geodetic Reference Frames, Proceedings of the IAG Symposium, Munich, Germany, 9–14 October 2006, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_15 ↗
32. Geodetic reference frames transformations10.1179/sre.2006.38.301.608 ↗
33. National Geodetic Survey (NGS) (2025, May 17). Improving the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), Available online: https://geodesy.noaa.gov/2010Summit/Improving_the_NSRS.pdf.
34. Analysis of the IGS Contribution to ITRF202010.1007/s00190-024-01870-1 ↗
35. Semi-Kinematic Geodetic Reference Frame Based on the ITRF2014 for Malaysia10.1515/jogs-2020-0108 ↗
36. Drewes, H., Seitz, M., and Sánchez, L. (2024). Realisation of the Non-Rotating Terrestrial Reference Frame by an Actual Plate Kinematic and Crustal Deformation Model (APKIM2020). International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1345_2024_276.10.1007/1345_2024_276 ↗
37. Donnelly, N. (2012, January 4–5). Deformation Models for Dynamic (and Semi-Dynamic) Datums. Proceedings of theFIG/IAG/UNOOSA Reference Frame in Practice Technical Seminar, Rome, Italy. Available online: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/2013/2013_reference_frame_in_practice_comm5/2.3_dynamic_datums_donnelly.pdf.