Research on Predicting Joint Rotation Angles Through Mechanomyography Signals and the Broad Learning System
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the limitation of current upper limb rehabilitation exoskeletons—where pattern recognition-based assistance disrupts patients’ continuous motion—this study proposes a mechanomyography-based model for predicting shoulder and elbow joint angles. Small contact microphones were employed to collect mechanomyography signals, leveraging their ability to capture vibration signals above 8 Hz, making them ideal for mechanomyography acquisition. After extracting raw mechanomyography data, a bandpass filter (10–50 Hz) was applied to eliminate low- and high-frequency noise. To reduce computational overhead during model training, a Broad Learning System was adopted, which iteratively refines predictions by incrementally expanding nodes in the feature and enhancement layers rather than adding hidden layers. The Slime Mold Algorithm was further used to optimize hyperparameters of the Broad Learning System, enhancing prediction accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that mechanomyography signals exhibit a typical central frequency range of 10–50 Hz, and the Slime Mold Algorithm-optimized Broad Learning System model achieved a minimum coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.978, effectively predicting arm joint angles. This approach shows promise for exoskeletons, combining high control accuracy, real-time joint angle prediction, and computational efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Advanced Sensor and Control Systems · Iterative Learning Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Zhiyuan Research Institute, Hangzhou 310013, China
Funding
Postgraduate Research Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Vélez-Guerrero, M.A., Callejas-Cuervo, M., and Mazzoleni, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based wearable robotic exoskeletons for upper limb rehabilitation: A review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21062146 ↗
2. Coser, O., Tamantini, C., Soda, P., and Zollo, L. (2024). AI-based methodologies for exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation of the lower limb: A review. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1341580 ↗
3. Jing, H., Zheng, T., Zhang, Q., Sun, K., Li, L., Lai, M., Zhao, J., and Zhu, Y. (2023). Human Operation Augmentation through Wearable Robotic Limb Integrated with Mixed Reality Device. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8060479 ↗
4. Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: Systematic review with meta-analysis10.2147/MDER.S103102 ↗
5. A survey on deep learning for human activity recognition
6. Human activity recognition: A survey10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.100 ↗
7. Lower-limb medical and rehabilitation exoskeletons: A review of the current designs10.1109/RBME.2021.3078001 ↗
8. Dwivedi, A., Groll, H., and Beckerle, P. (2022). A systematic review of sensor fusion methods using peripheral bio-signals for human intention decoding. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22176319 ↗
9. High-accuracy hand gesture recognition on the wrist tendon group using pneumatic mechanomyography (pMMG)10.1109/TII.2023.3280312 ↗
10. Gesture Recognition through Mechanomyogram Signals: An Adaptive Framework for Arm Posture Variability10.1109/JBHI.2024.3483428 ↗
11. Shi, Y., Dong, W., Lin, W., He, L., Wang, X., Li, P., and Gao, Y. (2022). Human joint torque estimation based on mechanomyography for upper extremity exosuit. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11091335 ↗
12. Talib, I., Sundaraj, K., Hussain, J., Lam, C.K., and Ahmad, Z. (2022). Analysis of anthropometrics and mechanomyography signals as forearm flexion, pronation and supination torque predictors. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-20223-6 ↗
13. Quan, J., Uchitomi, H., Shigeyama, R., Gao, C., Ogata, T., Inaba, A., Orimo, S., and Miyake, Y. (2024). High-sensitivity acceleration sensor detecting micro-mechanomyogram and deep learning approach for parkinson’s disease classification. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-74526-x ↗
14. The effect of accelerometer mass in mechanomyography measurements10.21595/jve.2016.17420 ↗
15. A comparison between mechanomyographic condenser microphone and accelerometer measurements during submaximal isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.04.002 ↗
16. Wearable MMG-plus-one armband: Evaluation of normal force on mechanomyography (MMG) to enhance human-machine interfacing10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3043368 ↗
17. Szumilas, M., Władziński, M., and Wildner, K. (2021). A coupled piezoelectric sensor for mmg-based human-machine interfaces. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21248380 ↗
18. Development of MMG sensors using PVDF piezoelectric electrospinning for lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton10.1016/j.sna.2019.111708 ↗
19. Fang, Q., Cao, S., Qin, H., Yin, R., Zhang, W., and Zhang, H. (2023). A Novel Mechanomyography (MMG) Sensor Based on Piezo-Resistance Principle and with a Pyramidic Microarray. Micromachines, 14.10.3390/mi14101859 ↗
20. Esposito, D., Andreozzi, E., Fratini, A., Gargiulo, G.D., Savino, S., Niola, V., and Bifulco, P. (2018). A piezoresistive sensor to measure muscle contraction and mechanomyography. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082553 ↗
21. Human joint torque modelling with MMG and EMG during lower limb human-exoskeleton interaction10.1109/LRA.2021.3097832 ↗
22. Surface EMG based continuous estimation of human lower limb joint angles by using deep belief networks10.1016/j.bspc.2017.10.002 ↗
23. Coker, J., Chen, H., Schall, M.C., Gallagher, S., and Zabala, M. (2021). EMG and joint angle-based machine learning to predict future joint angles at the knee. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21113622 ↗
24. Knee Joint Torque Estimation in Femoral Prosthesis Users Using MMG and Low-Frequency Acceleration10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3502820 ↗
25. Research review for broad learning system: Algorithms, theory, and applications10.1109/TCYB.2021.3061094 ↗
26. Broad learning system: An effective and efficient incremental learning system without the need for deep architecture10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2716952 ↗
27. Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
28. The effect of sustained low-intensity contractions on supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103598 ↗
29. Wang, S., Yang, J., Yang, H., Sun, T., Dong, M., and Hou, Z.G. (2024, January 3–5). Prediction of Upper Limb Joint Angles Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion using Temporal Convolutional Network. Proceedings of the 2024 30th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), Leeds, UK.10.1109/M2VIP62491.2024.10746116 ↗
30. Yao, J., Xia, C., Zhang, H., and Zhu, C. (2022, January 17–19). Research on the Prediction of Elbow Joint Angle Based on Mechanomyography. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 10th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China.10.1109/ITAIC54216.2022.9836867 ↗
31. sEMG-based lower limb motion prediction using CNN-LSTM with improved PCA optimization algorithm10.1007/s42235-022-00280-3 ↗
32. Chaurasia, B.D. (2004). Human Anatomy, CBS Publisher.
33. New advances in mechanomyography sensor technology and signal processing: Validity and intrarater reliability of recordings from muscle
34. Fault separation and detection for compound bearing-gear fault condition based on decomposition of marginal Hilbert spectrum10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933730 ↗
35. Hilbert marginal spectrum analysis for automatic seizure detection in EEG signals10.1016/j.bspc.2015.01.002 ↗