Investigation of In Situ and Ex Situ Passivation of Pyrophoric Uranium–Niobium Alloy Powder

This work evaluates the effectiveness of in situ and ex situ passivation methods for mitigating the pyrophoricity of uranium–6 wt.% niobium spherical powders produced via the hydride–dehydride process coupled with plasma spheroidization. Oxide layer thickness was characterized using STEM/EDX, and pyrophoricity was assessed by a UN-recommended test method, which involves directly dropping the powders in the air. In situ passivation, performed by introducing flowing oxygen during spheroidization, produced oxide layers ranging from tens to hundreds of nanometers but resulted in inconsistent pyrophoricity mitigation at lower oxygen flow rates. Ex situ passivation, achieved by slow oxygen exposure over several months, formed uniform oxide layers of approximately 20 nm and consistently mitigated pyrophoricity. Despite requiring higher bulk oxygen content, in situ passivation enables faster processing and control of oxygen, while ex situ passivation achieves superior oxide uniformity with lower oxygen incorporation. These findings highlight the trade-offs between passivation methods and provide a foundation for improving the safety and scalability of reactive metal powder production.