Investigating Bayesian Parameter Identification Using Non-Standard Laboratory Specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the applicability of Bayesian inverse analysis for identifying parameters from non-standard aluminum specimens with notches that induce stress concentrations. Unlike conventional standardized specimens, the notched samples used in this work are typically unsuitable for direct parameter extraction due to geometric irregularities and size effects. The experimental procedure involved tensile tests conducted using a universal testing machine, with deformation data collected via LVDT sensors and optical measurements with digital image correlation. The numerical simulations were performed using a quadrilateral finite element model with embedded strong discontinuities to capture the complete material response, including elastic, plastic, and fracture behavior. The proposed identification procedure successfully provided reliable posterior parameter estimates on aluminum rectangular and single-notch specimens. Furthermore, the identified parameters were validated on a double-notch specimen made of the same material. The results highlight the importance of parameter interpretation and show that the Bayesian framework can reliably identify key material and model-dependent parameters from non-standard specimens while accounting for uncertainty in both measurements and model formulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice Hrvatske 15, 21000 Split, Croatia
HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI), Kende u.13-17, 1111 Budapest, Hungary
Funding
Croatian Science Foundation, Republic of Croatia · European Union · European Commission HORIZON Europe project
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Ibrahimbegovic, A. (2009). Nonlinear Solid Mechanics, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2331-5 ↗
2. Xu, A., Fang, G., Zhuang, L., and Gu, C. (2024). A multivariate student-t process model for dependent tail-weighted degradation data. IISE Trans., 1–17.10.1080/24725854.2024.2389538 ↗
3. Deep learning-based modeling method for probabilistic LCF life prediction of turbine blisk10.1016/j.jppr.2023.08.005 ↗
4. Xu, A., Wang, R., Weng, X., Wu, Q., and Zhuang, L. (2025). Strategic integration of adaptive sampling and ensemble techniques in federated learning for aircraft engine remaining useful life prediction. Appl. Soft Comput., 175.10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113067 ↗
5. Structural design of aeroengine radiators: State of the art and perspectives10.1016/j.jppr.2024.08.004 ↗
6. Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models10.1111/1467-9868.00294 ↗
7. Azad, M.S., Eum, D.M., Moriguchi, S., and Han, T.S. (2024). A Short Review on the Application of Bayesian Updating of the Mechanical Property Evaluation on Cementitious Materials. Multiscale Sci. Eng.10.1007/s42493-024-00122-w ↗
8. Identification of material parameters for structural analyses
9. Matthies, H.G., Zander, E., Rosić, B.V., Litvinenko, A., and Pajonk, O. (2016). Inverse Problems in a Bayesian Setting. Computational Methods for Solids and Fluids: Multiscale Analysis, Probability Aspects and Model Reduction, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-27996-1_10 ↗
10. Stanić, A., Brank, B., Ibrahimbegovic, A., and Matthies, H. (2021). Crack propagation simulation without crack tracking algorithm: Embedded discontinuity formulation with incompatible modes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 386.10.1016/j.cma.2021.114090 ↗
11. Enhanced solid element model with embedded strong discontinuity for representation of mesoscale quasi-brittle failure10.1007/s10704-024-00797-0 ↗
12. An Experimental Study on Fracture Energy of Plain Concrete10.1007/s40069-014-0068-1 ↗
13. Characterisation and Parameters Identification of Materials Constitutive and Damage Models: From Normalised Direct Approach to Most Advanced Inverse Problem Resolution10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.016 ↗
14. Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture behavior of ultra high performance concrete10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.117 ↗
15. Rhee, I., Lee, J.S., and Roh, Y.S. (2019). Fracture Parameters of Cement Mortar with Different Structural Dimensions Under the Direct Tension Test. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12111850 ↗
16. Uniaxial tension test for the determination of fracture parameters of concrete: State of the art10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00087-X ↗
17. Alkam, F., Pereira, I., and Lahmer, T. (2020). Qualitatively-improved identified parameters of prestressed concrete catenary poles using sensitivity-based Bayesian approach. Results Eng., 6.10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100104 ↗
18. Parameteridentificationmasonryarchbridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.040 ↗
19. Marsili, F., Friedman, N., Croce, P., Formichi, P., and Landi, F. (2016, January 21–23). On Bayesian Identification Methods for the Analysis of Existing Structures. Proceedings of the 2016 IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden.10.2749/stockholm.2016.0116 ↗
20. Cornaggia, A., Cocchetti, G., Maier, G., and Buljak, V. (2018, January 12–15). Inverse Structural Analyses on Small Punch Tests, with Model Reduction and Stochastic Approach. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Palermo, Italy.10.1109/EEEIC.2018.8494215 ↗
21. Parameter identification in elastoplastic material models by Small Punch Tests and inverse analysis with model reduction10.1007/s11012-018-0914-3 ↗
22. Estimation of residual stresses by inverse analysis based on experimental data from sample removal for “small punch” tests10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.062 ↗
23. Kurent, B., Friedman, N., Ao, W.K., and Brank, B. (2022). Bayesian updating of tall timber building model using modal data. Eng. Struct., 266.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114570 ↗
24. Ceravolo, R., Faraci, A., and Miraglia, G. (2020). Bayesian Calibration of Hysteretic Parameters with Consideration of the Model Discrepancy for Use in Seismic Structural Health Monitoring. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202007.0184.v1 ↗
25. A Tutorial on Bayesian Inference to Identify Material Parameters in Solid Mechanics10.1007/s11831-018-09311-x ↗
26. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
27. A comparative study on finite elements for capturing strong discontinuities: E-FEM vs X-FEM10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.020 ↗
28. Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids10.1002/nme.2042 ↗
29. Novel anisotropic continuum-discrete damage model capable of representing localized failure of massive structures: Part I: Theoretical formulation and numerical implementation10.1108/02644400910924825 ↗
30. Phase field modeling scheme with mesostructure for crack propagation in concrete composite
31. Huang, Y., jun Yang, Z., Zhang, H., and Natarajan, S. (2022). A phase-field cohesive zone model integrated with cell-based smoothed finite element method for quasi-brittle fracture simulations of concrete at mesoscale. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 396.10.1016/j.cma.2022.115074 ↗
32. Lattice Element Models and Their Peculiarities10.1007/s11831-017-9210-y ↗
33. Rock mechanics model capable of representing initial heterogeneities and full set of 3D failure mechanisms10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.024 ↗
34. Čarija, J., Marenić, E., Jarak, T., and Nikolić, M. (2024). Discrete Lattice Element Model for Fracture Propagation with Improved Elastic Response. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14031287 ↗
35. Rizvi, Z., Nikolic, M., and Wuttke, F. (2019). Lattice element method for simulations of failure in bio-cemented sands. Granul. Matter, 21.10.1007/s10035-019-0878-6 ↗
36. Calibration of brittle fracture models by sharp indenters and inverse analysis10.1007/s10704-013-9841-4 ↗
37. Bayesian optimization for inverse identification of cyclic constitutive law of structural steels from cyclic structural tests10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.054 ↗
38. Jia, X., Hou, W., and Papadimitriou, C. (2025). Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for uncertainty quantification and reliability updating using data. J. Reliab. Sci. Eng., 1.10.1088/3050-2454/adc580 ↗
39. Wu, W., Malik, M., Cantero-Chinchilla, S., Lawrie, T., Yan, W., Tanner, G., Remenyte-Prescott, R., and Chronopoulos, D. (2022). Guided waves-based damage identification in plates through an inverse Bayesian process. Ultrasonics, 125.10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106773 ↗
40. Hernández-Montes, E., Jalón, M.L., Rodríguez-Romero, R., Chiachío, J., Compán-Cardiel, V., and Gil-Martín, L.M. (2023). Bayesian structural parameter identification from ambient vibration in cultural heritage buildings: The case of the San Jerónimo monastery in Granada, Spain. Eng. Struct., 284.10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115924 ↗
41. Sevieri, G., Andreini, M., De Falco, A., and Matthies, H.G. (2019). Concrete gravity dams model parameters updating using static measurements. Eng. Struct., 196.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.072 ↗
42. Dynamic structural health monitoring for concrete gravity dams based on the Bayesian inference10.1007/s13349-020-00380-w ↗
43. Considerations on the identifiability of fracture and bond properties of reinforced concrete10.1002/nme.7289 ↗
44. Dobrilla, S., Lunardelli, M., Nikolić, M., Lowke, D., and Rosić, B. (2023). Bayesian inference of mesoscale mechanical properties of mortar using experimental data from a double shear test. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 409.10.1016/j.cma.2023.115964 ↗
45. Janouchová, E., Kučerová, A., Sýkora, J., Vorel, J., and Wan-Wendner, R. (2021). Robust probabilistic calibration of a stochastic lattice discrete particle model for concrete. Eng. Struct., 236.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112000 ↗
46. Parameter identification for phase-field modeling of fracture: A Bayesian approach with sampling-free update10.1007/s00466-020-01942-x ↗
47. Bayesian inversion for unified ductile phase-field fracture10.1007/s00466-021-02054-w ↗
48. Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 ↗
49. Šodan, M., Urbanics, A., Friedman, N., Stanic, A., and Nikolić, M. (2025). Comparison of Machine Learning and gPC-based proxy solutions for an efficient Bayesian identification of fracture parameters. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 436.10.1016/j.cma.2024.117686 ↗
50. Lye, A., Cicirello, A., and Patelli, E. (2021). Sampling methods for solving Bayesian model updating problems: A tutorial. Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 159.10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107760 ↗
51. Chiachio-Ruano, J., Chiachio-Ruano, M., and Sankararaman, S. (2021). Bayesian Inverse Problems: Fundamentals and Engineering Applications, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/b22018 ↗
52. Hadwin, P.J., Motie-Shirazi, M., Erath, B.D., and Peterson, S.D. (2019). Bayesian Inference of Vocal Fold Material Properties from Glottal Area Waveforms Using a 2D Finite Element Model. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9132735 ↗
53. Xiu, D. (2010). Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835348 ↗
54. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
55. Ramancha, M.K., Vega, M.A., Conte, J.P., Todd, M.D., and Hu, Z. (2022). Bayesian model updating with finite element vs surrogate models: Application to a miter gate structural system. Eng. Struct., 272.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114901 ↗
56. Landi, F., Marsili, F., Friedman, N., and Croce, P. (2021). gPCE-Based Stochastic Inverse Methods: A Benchmark Study from a Civil Engineer’s Perspective. Infrastructures, 6.10.3390/infrastructures6110158 ↗
57. Physical Systems with Random Uncertainties: Chaos Representations with Arbitrary Probability Measure10.1137/S1064827503424505 ↗
58. Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) Based Surrogate Modeling and Optimization for Batch Crystallization Processes10.1016/B978-0-444-63456-6.50095-8 ↗
59. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002 ↗
60. Competitive comparison of optimal designs of experiments for sampling-based sensitivity analysis10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.04.009 ↗
61. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1 ↗
62. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018 ↗
63. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
64. Ncorr: Open-Source 2D Digital Image Correlation Matlab Software10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1 ↗
65. MathWorks Inc (2025, March 12). MATLAB R2021b. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com.
66. Taylor, R.D. (2025, March 12). FEAP-Finite Element Analysis Program. Available online: http://projects.ce.berkeley.edu/feap/.
67. Zander, E. (2025, March 12). A Matlab/Octave Toolbox for Stochastic Galerkin Methods. Available online: https://ezander.github.io/sglib/.