The Spatial and Non-Spatial Analyses of the Bike-Sharing Service in Small Urban Areas in Slovakia: The Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to develop a case study of the recent situation of a bike-sharing service in a chosen small urban area. Žilina is situated in northern Slovakia, with a population exceeding 80,000 and an area of 80.03 km2. This study represents a complex analysis of the available data on a bike-sharing service, as well as data on bicycle rentals from a local provider. Both were processed by the QGIS software. First, the number of rentals and the attractiveness of the bicycle stations were evaluated, taking into account the seasons from 2019 to the end of the 2023 season. Spatial analysis, based on marking the availability of the isochrones of the 32 bike-sharing stations at the end of the season 2024, was conducted considering the map’s characteristics. The analysis was supplemented with a questionnaire survey of bike-sharing service users. This study provides an overall view of the recent situation of a bike-sharing service operating for five years in a small urban area with the intention of identifying deficiencies and improving the service for future system expansion. The originality of this paper lies in the processing of a wide dataset with an extensive set of control variables and the connection of spatial and non-spatial analyses. The approaches and results can serve as proposals for introducing or designing bike-sharing services in other small urban areas for researchers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Methods and Economic Informatics, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communication, University of Žilina, 010 01 Žilina, Slovakia
Funding
Institutional Research of the Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Macioszek, E., Świerk, P., and Kurek, A. (2020). The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study Based on a City in Poland. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083285 ↗
2. Ministerstvo Dopravy, Výstavby a Regionálneho Rozvoja SR (2022). Národná Stratégia Rozvoja Cyklistickej Dopravy a Cykloturistiky v Slovenskej Republike, Cykloportál.sk. Available online: https://www.cykloportal.sk.
3. Gogola, M., Lokšová, Z., and Poliaková, B. (2013). Systémy Verejnej Osobnej Dopravy, EDIS. [2013th ed.].
4. Why People like Using Bikesharing: Factors Influencing Bikeshare Use in a Chinese Sample10.1016/j.trd.2020.102520 ↗
5. Jung, J., and Jung, D. (2023). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Extra Journey Time of Public Bicycles. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151813804 ↗
6. DeMaio, P., O’Brien, O., Rabello, R., Chou, S., and Benicchio, T. (2025, March 24). The Meddin Bike-Sharing World Map Report. Available online: https://bikesharingworldmap.com/reports/bswm_mid2022report.pdf.
7. Biassoni, F., Lo Carmine, C., Perego, P., and Gnerre, M. (2023). Choosing the Bicycle as a Mode of Transportation, the Influence of Infrastructure Perception, Travel Satisfaction and Pro-Environmental Attitude, the Case of Milan. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151612117 ↗
8. A Review of Bicycle-Sharing Service Planning Problems10.1016/j.trc.2020.102648 ↗
9. Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.261 ↗
10. Premier’s Council for Active Living Research into Barriers to Cycling in NSW, Yumpu.com. Available online: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/3546676/research-into-barriers-to-cycling-in-nsw-the-premiers-council-for-.
11. Irlam, J.H. (2016). Barriers to Cycling Mobility in Masiphumelele, Cape Town: A Best-Worst Scaling Approach. [Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town].
12. Joint Analysis of the Impacts of Built Environment on Bikeshare Station Capacity and Trip Attractions10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102603 ↗
13. A Solution to Measure Traveler’s Transfer Tolerance for Walking Mode and Dockless Bike-Sharing Mode10.1007/s11227-017-2211-7 ↗
14. Car-Pedestrian and Car-Cyclist Accidents in Hungary10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.085 ↗
15. How Safe Are Cycl. Eur. Roads?10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.269 ↗
16. Cyclist Gaze Behavior in Urban Space: An Eye-Tracking Experiment on the Bicycle Network of Bologna10.1016/j.cstp.2016.06.001 ↗
17. Evaluation of E-Bike Accidents in Switzerland10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.020 ↗
18. Kubal’ák, S., and Gogola, M. (2020, January 21–23). The Accident Rate of Cyclists in the Slovak Republic in Bike-Sharing System. Proceedings of the 2020 XII International Science-Technical Conference AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY, Kielce, Poland.10.1109/AUTOMOTIVESAFETY47494.2020.9293509 ↗
19. Active Transportation and Physical Activity: Opportunities for Collaboration on Transportation and Public Health Research10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003 ↗
20. Environmental Impacts of Shared Mobility: A Systematic Literature Review of Life-Cycle Assessments Focusing on Car Sharing, Carpooling, Bikesharing, Scooters and Moped Sharing10.1080/01441647.2023.2259104 ↗
21. Shaaban, K. (2020). Why Don’t People Ride Bicycles in High-Income Developing Countries, and Can Bike-Sharing Be the Solution? The Case of Qatar. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12041693 ↗
22. Free-Floating Bikesharing in Vienna—A User Behaviour Analysis10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.020 ↗
23. The Death and Rebirth of Bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for Policy and System Design10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.012 ↗
24. Bikesharing Experience in the City of Adelaide: Insight from a Preliminary Study10.1016/j.cstp.2019.01.001 ↗
25. Cycle Accessibility and Level of Traffic Stress: A Case Study of Toronto10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102496 ↗
26. Toward Sustainable Travel: An Analysis of Campus Bikeshare Use
27. Barriers to Bikesharing: An Analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.005 ↗
28. Options for Assessing the Impact of the Bike-Sharing System on Mobility in the City Žilina10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.173 ↗
29. Environmental Benefits of Bike Sharing: A Big Data-Based Analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101 ↗
30. Bike-Sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3 ↗
31. Bike Sharing: A Review of Evidence on Impacts and Processes of Implementation and Operation
32. Machynová, Z. (2025, March 26). Obľúbený bikesharing sa vracia do ulíc mesta, v tomto roku sa rozšíri o nové stanice i bicykle. Mesto Žilina 2022. Available online: https://www.zilina.sk.
33. Quantifying Saturation Point of Beijing Bike-Sharing Market from Environmental Benefit: A Data Mining Framework10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138686 ↗
34. Zheng, F., Gu, F., Zhang, W., and Guo, J. (2019). Is Bicycle Sharing an Environmental Practice? Evidence from a Life Cycle Assessment Based on Behavioral Surveys. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11061550 ↗
35. Safety in Numbers: More Walkers and Bicyclists, Safer Walking and Bicycling10.1136/ip.9.3.205 ↗
36. Bike-Sharing Systems and Congestion: Evidence from US Cities10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.022 ↗
37. Characterizing the Speed and Paths of Shared Bicycle Use in Lyon10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.002 ↗
38. Health Effects of the London Bicycle Sharing System: Health Impact Modelling Study10.1136/bmj.g425 ↗
39. Caggiani, L., and Camporeale, R. (2021). Toward Sustainability: Bike-Sharing Systems Design, Simulation and Management. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147519 ↗
40. Smart Solution of Traffic Congestion through Bike Sharing System in a Small City10.1007/s11036-020-01516-4 ↗
41. Cycling Traffic Development in Slovakia in the Terms of the City of Košice10.1051/matecconf/201713400042 ↗
42. Kubaľák, S., Kalašová, A., and Hájnik, A. (2021). The Bike-Sharing System in Slovakia and the Impact of COVID-19 on This Shared Mobility Service in a Selected City. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13126544 ↗
43. Polis Network (2023). Paris and Antwerp Lead the Way in Bike-Sharing, Polis Network. Available online: https://www.polisnetwork.eu.
44. Sierpiński, G., and Macioszek, E. (2021). Method to Evaluate a Bike-Sharing System Based on Performance Parameters. Decision Support Methods in Modern Transportation Systems and Networks, Springer International Publishing.
45. Yanocha, D., Mason, J., Patlán, M., Benicchio, T., Alfred, I., and Laksmana, U. (2025, March 26). The Bikeshare Planning Guide. Available online: https://www.itdp.org/publication/the-bike-share-planning-guide/.
46. NACTO (2024). NACTO Publications, National Association of City Transportation Officials. Available online: https://nacto.org/publications/.
47. Gogola, M., Poliaková, B., and Veterník, M. (2015). Štúdia Uskutočniteľnosti na Systém Požičovne Bicyklov (Bikesharing) v Meste Žilina, Mesto Žilina.
48. A Spatial Framework for Planning Station-Based Bike Sharing Systems10.1186/s12544-019-0347-7 ↗
49. A Ride for Whom: Has Cycling Network Expansion Reduced Inequities in Accessibility in Montreal, Canada?10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.02.005 ↗
50. Optimizing Bikeshare Service to Connect Affordable Housing Units with Transit Service10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103894 ↗
51. A New Dynamic Repositioning Approach for Bike Sharing Systems10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.093 ↗
52. Analysing the Trip and User Characteristics of the Combined Bicycle and Transit Mode10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.017 ↗
53. An Optimisation Algorithm to Establish the Location of Stations of a Mixed Fleet Biking System: An Application to the City of Lisbon10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.769 ↗
54. Żochowska, R., Jacyna, M., Kłos, M.J., and Soczówka, P. (2021). A GIS-Based Method of the Assessment of Spatial Integration of Bike-Sharing Stations. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073894 ↗
55. The Ideal Isochrone: Assessing the Efficiency of Transport Systems
56. How Transit Service Closures Influence Bikesharing Demand; Lessons Learned from SafeTrack Project in Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.004 ↗
57. Exploring the Relationship between Bike-Sharing and Public Transport in Poznań, Poland10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.003 ↗
58. Dynamic Accessibility Mapping Using Floating Car Data: A Network-Constrained Density Estimation Approach10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.07.003 ↗
59. (2025, March 25). OECD The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en.html.
60. BikeKIA (2025, March 26). BikeKIA—Bikesharing v Žiline—Požičaj si bicykel. Available online: https://www.bikekia.sk.
61. 15-, 10- or 5-Minute City? A Focus on Accessibility to Services in Turin, Italy10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100030 ↗
62. Estimating Pedestrian Speed Using Aggregated Literature Data10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.044 ↗
63. GIS Support (2025, March 26). Priestorové Analýzy—GIS Riešenia. Available online: https://www.gis-riesenia.sk/.
64. OpenStreetMap (2025, March 26). OpenStreetMap. Available online: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.
65. PTV Group (2025, March 25). Empowering Mobility for a Cleaner, Smarter & Safer Future. Available online: https://www.ptvgroup.com/en.
66. Calculator.net (2025, March 25). Sample Size Calculator. Available online: https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html.
67. (2025, March 25). The Meddin Bike-sharing World Map The Meddin Bike-Sharing World Map. Available online: https://bikesharingworldmap.com/.
68. Arboria (2025, March 26). Arboria Bike—Trnavský systém zdieľaných elektrobicyklov. Available online: https://arboriabike.sk/.
69. Nextbike Czech Republic (2025, March 26). Jihlava—Nextbike Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.nextbikeczech.com/mesta/.
70. Biketower (2025, March 26). Biketower—CZ Pardubice. Available online: https://www.biketower.cz.
71. (2025, March 26). Bike Share Map: Offenburg Bike Share Map: Offenburg (EinfachMobil). Available online: https://bikesharemap.com/offenburg/.
72. Vélhop (2025, March 26). Service de Location de Vélo de l’Eurométropole de Strasbourg. Available online: https://www.velhop.strasbourg.eu.
73. Comune di Trieste (2025, March 26). Mobilità Sostenibile—Comune di Trieste. Available online: https://www.comune.trieste.it/mobilita-sostenibile.
74. (2025, March 26). Brescia mobilita Brescia Mobilita. Available online: https://bicimia.bresciamobilita.it/default.aspx.
75. (2025, March 26). Temperatura, mora Temperatura mora Widget. Available online: https://temperatura-mora.hr/widget/.
76. Beryl (2025, March 26). Brighton and Hove—Beryl Bike-Sharing Scheme. Available online: https://beryl.cc/scheme/brighton-and-hove.
77. (2025, March 26). The city bike The City Bike. Available online: https://www.kolumbus.no/en/travel/bicycle/bysykkelen/.
78. (2025, March 25). CG eGOV—Administratívne Členenie CG eGOV—Administratívne Členenie. Available online: https://egov.zilina.sk/Default.aspx?NavigationState=160:0:.
79. Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments?10.3141/2276-12 ↗
80. Bhellar, M.G., Talpur, M.A.H., Khahro, S.H., Ali, T.H., and Javed, Y. (2023). Visualizing Travel Accessibility in a Congested City Center: A GIS-Based Isochrone Model and Trip Rate Analysis Considering Sustainable Transportation Solutions. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152316499 ↗
81. Comparing the Performance of Different Types of Bike Share Systems10.1016/j.trd.2021.102823 ↗
82. How Could the Station-Based Bike Sharing System and the Free-Floating Bike Sharing System Be Coordinated?10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102896 ↗
83. Mahajan, S., and Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J. (2025, March 25). Evaluating Urban Bike-Sharing Accessibility: A Comparative Study of 40 Cities Worldwide. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4853905.10.2139/ssrn.4853905 ↗
84. Bike-Sharing System in the Czech Republic and Foreign10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.104 ↗
85. An Exploratory Study of Spatial Patterns of Cycling in Tel Aviv Using Passively Generated Bike-Sharing Data10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.005 ↗