journal article·2025-05-28Open access

Research Progress and Technology Outlook of Deep Learning in Seepage Field Prediction During Oil and Gas Field Development

Tong Wu, Qingjie Liu, Yueyue Wang, Ying Xu, Jiale Shi, Yu Yao, Qiang Chen, Jianxun Liang, Shu Tang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

As the development of oilfields in China enters its middle-to-late stage, the old oilfields still occupy a dominant position in the production structure. The seepage process of reservoirs in the high Water Content Period (WCP) presents significant nonlinear and non-homogeneous evolution characteristics, and the traditional seepage-modeling methods are facing the double challenges of accuracy and adaptability when dealing with complex dynamic scenarios. In recent years, Deep Learning technology has gradually become an important tool for reservoir seepage field prediction by virtue of its powerful feature extraction and nonlinear modeling capabilities. This paper systematically reviews the development history of seepage field prediction methods and focuses on the typical models and application paths of Deep Learning in this field, including FeedForward Neural networks, Convolutional Neural Networks, temporal networks, Graphical Neural Networks, and Physical Information Neural Networks (PINNs). Key processes based on Deep Learning, such as feature engineering, network structure design, and physical constraint integration mechanisms, are further explored. Based on the summary of the existing results, this paper proposes future development directions including real-time prediction and closed-loop optimization, multi-source data fusion, physical consistency modeling and interpretability enhancement, model migration, and online updating capability. The research aims to provide theoretical support and technical reference for the intelligent development of old oilfields, the construction of digital twin reservoirs, and the prediction of seepage behavior in complex reservoirs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Engineering Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Institute of Porous Flow and Fluid Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Langfang 065007, China

State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China

Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental System (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Funding

CNPC Science and Technology Innovation Fund

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of the World Oil and Gas Exploration Situation in 202110.1016/S1876-3804(22)60343-4 ↗
2. A physics-regularized deep neural network for pressure field prediction in heterogeneous reservoirs
3. Establishment of sample pool and prediction of saturation field in complex fault block reservoir based on deep learning algorithm10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211654 ↗
4. A deep learning-based convolutional spatiotemporal network proxy model for reservoir production prediction10.1063/5.0215063 ↗
5. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
6. Application of artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models in predicting seepage and pore water pressure of dams: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103268 ↗
7. Nourani, V., Behfar, N., Dabrowska, D., and Zhang, Y. (2021). The applications of soft computing methods for seepage modeling: A review. Water, 13.10.3390/w13233384 ↗
8. Evaluation and Reconstruction of Reservoir Seepage Field in High Water Cut Stage Based on Seepage Characteristics Analysis10.1007/s13202-018-0476-x ↗
9. Hou, W., Wen, Y., Deng, G., Zhang, Y., and Wang, X. (2023). A multi-target prediction model for dam seepage field. Front. Earth Sci., 11.10.3389/feart.2023.1156114 ↗
10. Advanced machine learning approaches for predicting permeability in reservoir pay zones based on core analyses10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32666 ↗
11. Ensemble machine learning: An untapped modeling paradigm for petroleum reservoir characterization10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.024 ↗
12. Application of supervised machine learning paradigms in the prediction of petroleum reservoir properties: Comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108182 ↗
13. A review of artificial intelligence methods for predicting gravity dam seepage, challenges and way-out10.2166/aqua.2023.042 ↗
14. Ma, Z., Shen, Z., and Yang, J. (2024). Inversion model for permeability coefficient based on Random Forest–Secretary Bird Optimization algorithm: Case study of lower reservoir of C-pumped storage power station. Water, 16.10.3390/w16213096 ↗
15. Porous Media Model of Reservoir Considering Seepage Stress Coupling and Seepage Field Analysis10.1155/2023/3759667 ↗
16. Multi-scale nonlinear reservoir flow simulation based on digital core reconstruction10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213218 ↗
17. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Fluid Mechanics: A Review10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
18. Prospects of Multi-Paradigm Fusion Research for Fluid Mechanics
19. Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces With Physics-Informed Neural Networks10.1109/TAI.2022.3192362 ↗
20. Hong, Y., Li, S., Wang, H., Liu, P., and Cao, Y. (2023). Quantitative prediction of rock pore-throat radius based on deep neural network. Energies, 16.10.2139/ssrn.4443044 ↗
21. A physics-constrained deep learning model for simulating multiphase flow in 3D heterogeneous porous media10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122693 ↗
22. Qian, C., Xie, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, R., and Mou, B. (2024). Study on numerical simulation of gas–water two-phase micro-seepage considering fluid–solid coupling in the cleats of coal rocks. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17040928 ↗
23. Prediction of two-phase flow properties for digital sandstones using 3D convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104442 ↗
24. Liu, C., Feng, Q., Zhou, W., Li, S., and Zhang, X. (2024). Infill well location optimization method based on recoverable potential evaluation of remaining oil. Energies, 17.10.20944/preprints202405.1542.v1 ↗
25. Artificial Intelligence in Fluid Mechanics10.1007/s10409-021-01154-3 ↗
26. A deep learning framework for solution and discovery in solid mechanics
27. Sharma, R., Raissi, M., and Guo, Y.B. (2024). Physics-informed machine learning for smart additive manufacturing. arXiv.
28. Ensemble Kalman Method and Its Applications in Turbulence Modelling
29. Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations
30. Development of Digital Intelligence Fluid Dynamics and Applications in the Oil & Gas Seepage Fields
31. Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics–Informed Neural Networks: Where We Are and What’s Next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
32. Deep Learning of Turbulent Scalar Mixing10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.124501 ↗
33. Prediction of Porous Media Fluid Flow Using Physics Informed Neural Networks10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109205 ↗
34. Data-Driven Discovery of Partial Differential Equations10.1126/sciadv.1602614 ↗
35. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., Ahmadi, N., and Karniadakis, G.E. (2024). Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions. arXiv.
36. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G.E. (2018). Multistep Neural Networks for Data-Driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. arXiv.
37. Integrated Petrophysical and Reservoir Characterization Workflow to Enhance Permeability and Water Saturation Prediction10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.04.014 ↗
38. Modified UNet with Attention Gate and Dense Skip Connection for Flow Field Information Prediction with Porous Media10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102300 ↗
39. Application and Development Trend of Artificial Intelligence in Petroleum Exploration and Development10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60001-0 ↗
40. Multi-Field Coupled Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Simulation Technique of Gas Transport in Deep Coal Seams10.46690/ager.2025.01.09 ↗
41. Physics-Informed Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Efficiently Modeling Oil–Water Two-Phase Darcy Flow10.1063/5.0249560 ↗
42. Zhou, W., Liu, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, P., and Jiang, L. (2024). Machine learning in reservoir engineering: A review. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12061219 ↗
43. Sequence-to-Sequence Borehole Formation Property Prediction via Multi-Task Deep Networks with Sparse Core Calibration10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109637 ↗
44. The Practice and Understanding of Reconstructing the Flow Field by the Homogenization-Flowline Method10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032003 ↗
45. Radial Fingering in a Hele Shaw Cell10.1017/S0022112081003613 ↗
46. Neural network applications to reservoirs: Physics-based models and data models10.1016/j.petrol.2014.10.015 ↗
47. Jiang, C., Liu, Q., Leng, K., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., and Wu, T. (2025). The Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Flow Heterogeneity During Water Flooding for an Artificial Core Plate Model. Energies, 18.10.3390/en18020309 ↗
48. Estimation of permeability of naturally fractured reservoirs by pressure transient analysis: An innovative reservoir characterization and flow simulation10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.027 ↗
49. Forward Modeling of Tight Sandstone Permeability Based on Mud Intrusion Depth and Its Application in the South of the Ordos Basin10.1007/s11770-021-0899-x ↗
50. Numerical Approach of a Coupled Pressure–Saturation Model Describing Oil–Water Flow in Porous Media10.1007/s42967-022-00200-6 ↗
51. Xue, L., Liu, P., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Status and prospect of improved oil recovery technology of high water cut reservoirs. Water, 15.10.3390/w15071342 ↗
52. The anisotropic seepage analysis of water-sealed underground oil storage caverns10.1016/j.tust.2013.05.003 ↗
53. Research on flow field reconstruction of complex fault-block reservoir during ultra-high water cut period10.1007/s42452-024-06386-z ↗
54. Modelling and simulation of multiphase flow applicable to processes in oil and gas industry10.1515/cppm-2017-0066 ↗
55. A new method of predicting the saturation pressure of oil reservoir and its application10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.042 ↗
56. Numerical simulation and evaluation of residual oil saturation in waterflooded reservoirs10.1016/j.fuel.2024.134018 ↗
57. Remaining oil distribution characteristics in an oil reservoir with ultra-high water-cut10.1016/j.engeos.2022.06.004 ↗
58. Jiang, N., Zhang, Z., Qu, G., Zhi, J., and Zhang, R. (2022). Distribution characteristics of micro remaining oil of class III reservoirs after fracture flooding in Daqing oilfield. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15093385 ↗
59. Towards a new paradigm in intelligence-driven computational fluid dynamics simulations
60. Jia, D., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wu, L., and Qiao, M. (2023). Recent development of smart field deployment for mature waterflood reservoirs. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010784 ↗
61. Poromechanics of fractured/faulted reservoirs during fluid injection based on continuum damage modeling and machine learning10.1007/s11053-022-10134-8 ↗
62. Development of a Modeling Tool to Assess Seepage Management Options for Large-Scale Water-Sealed Oil Storage Caverns10.1007/s12665-021-09930-x ↗
63. Inverse modeling of nonisothermal multiphase poromechanics using physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112323 ↗
64. Physics-constrained deep learning for solving seepage equation10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109046 ↗
65. Assessment of regularized ensemble Kalman method for inversion of turbulence quantity fields
66. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G.E. (2017). Physics-Informed Deep Learning II: Data-Driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. arXiv.
67. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G.S., Davis, A., Dean, J., and Devin, M. (2015). TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. arXiv.
68. Advances in control of turbulence by artificial intelligence: Systems, algorithms, achievements and data analysis methods
69. Banerjee, C., Nguyen, K., Fookes, C., and Raissi, M. (IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2023). A Survey on Physics-Informed Reinforcement Learning: Review and Open Problems, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., early access.10.2139/ssrn.4597487 ↗