From Knowledge to Leverage: How to Use Musculoskeletal Simulation to Design Exoskeleton Concepts
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: An exoskeleton and its wearer form a mutually dependent biomechanical system, where design choices for the exoskeleton can affect the wearer in complex and often unforeseeable ways, and this makes exoskeleton design challenging. Advanced simulation methods provide an insight into the consequences of design choices, but such analysis is usually employed towards the end of the design process. This paper demonstrates an option for musculoskeletal simulation to be used already in the conceptual design phase. Methods: We present the workflow by means of an example of box lifting. We show that the mathematical algorithm underlying the solution of the redundant equilibrium equations in musculoskeletal modeling has a structure that can be exploited to gain information about ideal actuator forces for an exoskeleton supporting the selected work task. Results: Based on the identified forces, passive or active actuators can be selected, and control strategies can be devised. Conclusions: We conclude that this methodology can save design cycles and improve exoskeleton development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Exoskeletons for Industrial Application and Their Potential Effects on Physical Work Load10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 ↗
2. Analysis of Musculoskeletal Systems in the AnyBody Modeling System10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.001 ↗
3. Nikravesh, P.E. (1988). Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4. Prediction of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments during Sports-Related Movements10.1007/s11044-016-9537-4 ↗
5. Simultaneous Estimation of Ground Reaction Force and Knee Contact Force during Walking and Squatting10.1007/s12541-017-0148-7 ↗
6. Relationship between Knee Joint Contact Forces and External Knee Joint Moments in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: Effects of Gait Modifications10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.011 ↗
7. Evaluation of Predicted Patellofemoral Joint Kinematics with a Moving-Axis Joint Model10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.08.001 ↗
8. Zhang, L., Li, H., Wan, X., Xu, P., Zhu, A., and Wei, P. (2025). Prediction of In Vivo Knee Mechanics During Daily Activities Based on a Musculoskeletal Model Incorporated with a Subject-Specific Knee Joint. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12020153 ↗
9. Influence of Lumbar Spine Rhythms and Intra-Abdominal Pressure on Spinal Loads and Trunk Muscle Forces during Upper Body Inclination10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.013 ↗
10. Development and Validation of a Three Dimensional Dynamic Biomechanical Lifting Model for Lower Back Evaluation for Careful Box Placement10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.005 ↗
11. Validation of the AnyBody Full Body Musculoskeletal Model in Computing Lumbar Spine Loads at L4L5 Level10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.025 ↗
12. Bassani, T., Stucovitz, E., Quian, Z., Briguglio, M., and Galbusera, F. (2020). Assessment of the Anybody Full Body Musculoskeletal Model in Computing Spine Loads at Lumbar Level: Comparison with In Vivo Values Obtained During Exercise Tasks, ScienceOpen Posters.10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPIVBHK.v1 ↗
13. Liu, T., Khalaf, K., Adeeb, S., and El-Rich, M. (2019). Numerical Investigation of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Effects on Spinal Loads and Load-Sharing in Forward Flexion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 7.10.3389/fbioe.2019.00428 ↗
14. Biomechanical Investigation of a Passive Upper-Extremity Exoskeleton for Manual Material Handling—A Computational Parameter Study and Modelling Approach10.1504/IJHFMS.2022.124304 ↗
15. Cardona, M., García Cena, C.E., Serrano, F., and Saltaren, R. (2020). ALICE: Conceptual Development of a Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robot Driven by an on-Board Musculoskeletal Simulator. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20030789 ↗
16. Effects of Exoskeleton Design and Precision Requirements on Physical Demands and Quality in a Simulated Overhead Drilling Task10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.014 ↗
17. Lower Limb Assistive Device Design Optimization Using Musculoskeletal Modeling: A Review10.1115/1.4044739 ↗
18. A Human-Centered Design Optimization Approach for Robotic Exoskeletons through Biomechanical Simulation10.1016/j.robot.2016.12.012 ↗
19. Rethinking Exoskeleton Simulation-Based Design: The Effect of Using Different Cost Functions10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3409633 ↗
20. Agarwal, P., Narayanan, M.S., Lee, L.-F., Mendel, F., and Krovi, V.N. (2010, January 15–18). Simulation-Based Design of Exoskeletons Using Musculoskeletal Analysis. Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1115/DETC2010-28572 ↗
21. A Generic Framework for Cost Estimation and Cost Control in Product Design10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00405-2 ↗
22. Muscle Recruitment by the Min/Max Criterion—A Comparative Numerical Study10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00191-3 ↗
23. Use of Optimization Techniques to Predict Muscle Forces10.1115/1.3426197 ↗
24. Lund, M.E., Tørholm, S., Jensen, B.K., Galibarov, P.E., Dzialo, C.M., Iversen, K., Sarivan, M., Marra, M.A., and Simonsen, S.T. (2025, May 20). The AnyBody Managed Model Repository (AMMR). Available online: https://www.anybodytech.com/software/anybodymodelingsystem/.
25. Marra, M.A., Vanheule, V., Fluit, R., Koopman, B.H.F.J.M., Rasmussen, J., Verdonschot, N., and Andersen, M.S. (2015). A Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling Framework to Predict in Vivo Mechanics of Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Biomech. Eng., 137.10.1115/1.4029258 ↗
26. Ignasiak, D. (2020). A Novel Method for Prediction of Postoperative Global Sagittal Alignment Based on Full-Body Musculoskeletal Modeling and Posture Optimization. J. Biomech., 102.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109324 ↗
27. Evaluation of a Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modelling Framework for Load Prediction in Total Knee Arthroplasty10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.04.010 ↗
28. Agreement of Measured and Calculated Muscle Activity during Highly Dynamic Movements Modelled with a Spherical Knee Joint10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.013 ↗
29. Rasmussen, J., Iversen, K., Engelund, B.K., and Rasmussen, S. (2021). Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effect of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Compared with Traditional Approaches in Lifting Tasks. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.10.3389/fbioe.2021.724854 ↗
30. Rasmussen, J., Engelund, B.K., and Iversen, K. (2025). Musculoskeletal Simulation Results for Boxlifting with and Without Conceptually Designed Exoskeletons, Zenodo.