journal article·2025-05-21Open access

Exploring the Impacts of Yellow Light Duration on Intersection Performance Under Driving Behavior Uncertainty: A Risk Perception and Fuzzy Decision-Based Simulation Framework

Jun Hua, Bin Li, Pengcheng Li, Wei Zhang, Zhenhua Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

In existing traffic simulation software or studies related to traffic flow at signalized intersections, the treatment of yellow lights is often simplified or overlooked. However, driving behavior during the yellow phase is characterized by significant uncertainty, which can lead to discrepancies between simulation results and real-world conditions. To address this issue, this paper develops a driving behavior model based on risk perception and fuzzy decision-making and integrates it into a simulation framework to replicate continuous driving behaviors at isolated signalized intersections. The performance of intersections under varying yellow light durations is analyzed, yielding some key findings. For instance, when vehicles strictly adhere to the designed speed, increasing the yellow light duration from 3 s to 5 s results in higher traffic volumes under high traffic density. Furthermore, real-time traffic speed fluctuations stabilize, and the occurrence of unsafe driving behaviors decreases. The concept of risk perception is employed to explain the underlying mechanisms behind these phenomena. This paper provides both a theoretical foundation and a simulation framework for more detailed representations of driving behaviors and for explaining the fundamental principles governing intersection performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Vehicle emissions and performance · Traffic control and management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ITS Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China

State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Transportation System, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China

Highway Monitoring & Response Center, Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100029, China

Funding

State Key Lab of Intelligent Transportation System

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Principles of simulation
2. Bossel, H. (2018). Modeling and Simulation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315275574 ↗
3. Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109246 ↗
4. A comparative study of urban road traffic simulators10.1051/matecconf/20168105002 ↗
5. Vrbanić, F., Čakija, D., Kušić, K., and Ivanjko, E. (2021). Traffic flow simulators with connected and autonomous vehicles: A short review. Transform. Transp., 15–30.10.1007/978-3-030-66464-0_2 ↗
6. Combined control of freeway traffic involving cooperative adaptive cruise controlled and human driven vehicles using feedback control through SUMO10.1109/TITS.2021.3098640 ↗
7. Enabling bidirectional traffic mobility for ITS simulation in smart city environments10.1016/j.future.2018.10.015 ↗
8. Modeling and simulation of approaching behaviors to signalized intersections based on risk quantification10.1016/j.trc.2022.103773 ↗
9. Modeling decision-making process of drivers during yellow signal phase at intersections based on drift–diffusion model10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.020 ↗
10. Extending the decision-making process during yellow phase from human drivers to autonomous vehicles: A microsimulation study with safety considerations
11. Risk field model of driving and its application in modeling car-following behavior10.1109/TITS.2021.3105518 ↗
12. A risk-field based motion planning method for multi-vehicle conflict scenario10.1109/TVT.2023.3308912 ↗
13. Driving behavior model for multi-vehicle interaction at uncontrolled intersections based on risk field considering drivers’ visual field characteristics10.1109/TITS.2024.3465442 ↗
14. A unified risk field-based driving behavior model for car-following and lane-changing behaviors simulation10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102991 ↗
15. Al-Turki, M., Jamal, A., Al-Ahmadi, H.M., Al-Sughaiyer, M.A., and Zahid, M. (2020). On the potential impacts of smart traffic control for delay, fuel energy consumption, and emissions: An NSGA-II-based optimization case study from Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12187394 ↗
16. State-of-art review of traffic signal control methods: Challenges and opportunities10.1186/s12544-020-00439-1 ↗
17. The traffic signal control problem for intersections: A review10.1186/s12544-020-00440-8 ↗
18. Modeling dynamic distribution of dilemma zone at signalized intersections for developing world traffic
19. Comparison of proposed countermeasures for dilemma zone at signalized intersections based on cellular automata simulations10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.009 ↗
20. Exploring stop-go decision zones at rural high-speed intersections with flashing green signal and insufficient yellow time in China10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.011 ↗
21. Driver behavior formulation in intersection dilemma zones with phone use distraction via a logit-Bayesian network hybrid approach10.1080/15472450.2017.1350921 ↗
22. Impact of road environment on drivers’ behaviors in dilemma zone: Application of agent-based simulation10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.019 ↗
23. Exploring the impact of signal types and adjacent vehicles on drivers’ choices after the onset of yellow10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.066 ↗
24. Wolfgram, J. (2018). A Safety and Emissions Analysis of Continuous Flow Intersections. [Master’s Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst].
25. Impacts of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication on traffic flows with mixed connected vehicles and human-driven vehicles10.1142/S0217979221500910 ↗
26. Eco approaching at an isolated signalized intersection under partially connected and automated vehicles environment10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.001 ↗
27. Xiao, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, S., and Chen, T. (2021). Hierarchical longitudinal control for connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic on a signalized arterial. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13168852 ↗
28. Decentralized control of connected automated vehicle trajectories in mixed traffic at an isolated signalized intersection10.1016/j.trc.2020.102846 ↗
29. Lane-change-aware connected automated vehicle trajectory optimization at a signalized intersection with multi-lane roads10.1016/j.trc.2021.103182 ↗
30. An eco-driving strategy for partially connected automated vehicles at a signalized intersection10.1109/TITS.2022.3145453 ↗
31. A platoon based cooperative eco-driving model for mixed automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalised intersection10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.025 ↗
32. Mixed platoon control of automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalized intersection: Dynamical analysis and optimal control10.1016/j.trc.2021.103138 ↗
33. Trajectory planning for connected and automated vehicles at isolated signalized intersections under mixed traffic environment10.1016/j.trc.2021.103309 ↗
34. Enhancing mixed traffic flow safety via connected and autonomous vehicle trajectory planning with a reinforcement learning approach10.1155/2021/6117890 ↗
35. VISSIM-based simulation analysis on road network of CBD in Beijing, China10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.054 ↗
36. Multi-criteria analysis of optimal signal plans using microscopic traffic models10.1016/j.trd.2014.06.013 ↗
37. The effects of green signal countdown timer and retiming of signal intervals on dilemma zone related crash risk at signalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic conditions10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105862 ↗
38. Smith, D., Djahel, S., and Murphy, J. (2014, January 8–11). A SUMO based evaluation of road incidents’ impact on traffic congestion level in smart cities. Proceedings of the 39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops, Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/LCNW.2014.6927724 ↗
39. Improving SUMO’s Signal Control Programs by Introducing Route Information10.29007/d1xg ↗
40. An optimization model and traffic light control scheme for heterogeneous traffic systems10.1016/j.trc.2020.102911 ↗
41. Optimizing vehicle dynamics co-simulation performance by introducing mesoscopic traffic simulation10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102739 ↗
42. Ronaldo, A. (2012). Comparison of the Two Micro-Simulation Software Aimsun & Sumo for Highway Traffic Modelling. [Master’s Thesis, Linköping University].
43. Practical guidance for using mesoscopic simulation tools10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.078 ↗
44. Investigating the effect of suburban buses on traffic flow and carbon monoxide emission by Aimsun simulation software10.1007/s12524-020-01289-z ↗
45. Investigating the accuracy rate of vehicle-vehicle conflicts by LIDAR technology and microsimulation in VISSIM and AIMSUN
46. Simulation study on the effect of automated driving in a road network environment10.1049/iet-its.2019.0395 ↗
47. Evolution of traffic microsimulation and its use for modeling connected and automated vehicles10.1155/2021/2444363 ↗
48. The use of microscopic simulators for safety assessment in automated and partially automated scenarios: A comparison10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.177 ↗
49. Energy consumption models in VANET simulation tools for electric vehicles: A literature survey10.1504/IJAHUC.2023.127764 ↗
50. Laubenbacher, R., Jarrah, A.S., Mortveit, H.S., and Ravi, S.S. (2020). Agent-based modeling, mathematical formalism for. Complex Social and Behavioral Systems: Game Theory and Agent-Based Models, Springer.10.1007/978-1-0716-0368-0_10 ↗
51. Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001 ↗
52. SUMMIT: A multi-modal agent-based co-simulation of urban public transport with applications in contingency planning10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102760 ↗
53. Driver directional control model and the application in the research of intelligent vehicle
54. Almadi, A.I., Al Mamlook, R.E., Almarhabi, Y., Ullah, I., Jamal, A., and Bandara, N. (2022). A fuzzy-logic approach based on driver decision-making behavior modeling and simulation. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148874 ↗
55. Fuzzy sets to describe driver behavior in the dilemma zone of high-speed signalized intersections10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.003 ↗
56. Research on driver behavior in yellow interval at signalized intersections10.1155/2014/518782 ↗
57. Analysis of yellow-light running at signalized intersections using high-resolution traffic data10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.001 ↗
58. Real-time queue length estimation for congested signalized intersections10.1016/j.trc.2009.02.003 ↗
59. Modeling Vehicle Paths at Intersections: A Unified Approach Based on Entrance and Exit Lanes10.1109/TITS.2023.3298344 ↗
60. The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01384.x ↗
61. Hurwitz, D., Abadi, M.G., McCrea, S., Quayle, S., and Marnell, P. (2016). Smart Red Clearance Extensions to Reduce Red-Light Running Crashes, Oregon. Dept. of Transportation. No. FHWA-OR-RD-16-10.
62. Li, K. (2006). Guidelines for Traffic Signal Control—Current German Regulations (RiLSA), China Construction Industry Press.
63. Amber interval design at urban signalized intersections
64. Fundamental diagram and stability analysis for heterogeneous traffic flow considering human-driven vehicle driver’s acceptance of cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles10.1016/j.physa.2021.126647 ↗
65. Multi-agent microsimulation of urban intersections considering yellow light driving behavior
66. Grey models for short-term queue length predictions for adaptive traffic signal control10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115618 ↗
67. Driver responses to green and red vehicular signal countdown displays: Safety and efficiency aspects10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.013 ↗
68. Mixed-integer linear programming for optimal scheduling of autonomous vehicle intersection crossing10.1109/TIV.2018.2843163 ↗
69. Influence of cognitive processes on driver decision-making in dilemma zone
70. Hoogendoorn, S., and Knoop, V. (2013). Traffic flow theory and modelling. The Transport System and Transport Policy: An Introduction, Edward Elgar Publishing.
71. Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework10.1016/j.aap.2020.105889 ↗
72. Analysis of speed reductions and crash risk of aggressive drivers during emergent pre-crash scenarios at unsignalized intersections10.1016/j.aap.2023.107088 ↗
73. Evaluation of driver deceleration behavior at signalized intersections10.3141/2018-05 ↗
74. Modelling the effect of aggressive driver behavior on longitudinal performance measures during car-following10.1016/j.trf.2022.11.006 ↗
75. Assessing traffic disturbance, efficiency, and safety of the mixed traffic flow of connected vehicles and traditional vehicles by considering human factors10.1016/j.trc.2020.102934 ↗
76. Does anisotropy hold in mixed traffic conditions?10.1016/j.physa.2023.129336 ↗
77. Der Einfluß des Grünblinkens auf die Leistungsfähigkeit und Sicherheit lichtsignalgeregelter Straßenkreuzungen
78. Effect of yellow-interval timing on the frequency of red-light violations at urban intersections10.3141/1865-04 ↗
79. Red-light running vehicles behaviour based on linear regression approach at traffic lights along Bakau Condong Road, Batu Pahat, Johor
80. Papaioannou, P., Papadopoulos, E., Nikolaidou, A., Politis, I., Basbas, S., and Kountouri, E. (2021). Dilemma zone: Modeling drivers’ decision at signalized intersections against aggressiveness and other factors using uav technology. Safety, 7.10.3390/safety7010011 ↗
81. Influential factors of red-light running at signalized intersection and prediction using a rare events logistic regression model10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.017 ↗
82. Yellow light dilemma zone researches: A review
83. A simulator study of factors influencing drivers’ behavior at traffic lights10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.009 ↗
84. Estimation of red-light running frequency using high-resolution traffic and signal data10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.010 ↗