Lymph Node Involvement Prediction Using Machine Learning: Analysis of Prostatic Nodule, Prostatic Gland, and Periprostatic Adipose Tissue (PPAT)

Background: Prostate cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality among men, with approximately 15% of newly diagnosed patients having pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM). For this reason, PLNM identification before localized PCa treatment would significantly impact treatment planning, clinical judgment, and patient outcome prediction. Radiomics has gained popularity for its ability to predict tumor behavior and prognosis without invasive procedures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in radiomic workups, particularly for prostate cancer. This study aims to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients using clinical information and mp-MRI radiomics features extracted from the suspicious nodule, prostate gland, and periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT). Methods: A retrospective review of 85 patients who underwent mp-MRI at our radiology department between 2016 and 2022 was conducted. This study included patients who underwent prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy with complete histological examination and previous staging mp-MRI and were divided into two groups based on lymph node status (positive/negative). Data were collected from each patient, including clinical information, radiomics, and semantic data (such as tumor MRI characteristics, histological tumor details, and lymph node status (LNS)). MRI exams were conducted using a 1.5-T system and were used to study the prostate gland. A three-year resident manually segmented the prostate nodule, prostatic gland, and periprostatic tissue using an open-source segmentation program. A random forest (RF) machine learning model was developed and tested using Chat-GPT version 4.0 software. The model’s performance in predicting LNS was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC), with sensitivity and specificity evaluated using DeLong’s test. Results: Random forest demonstrated the best performance in prediction considering features extracted from DWI nodules (67% of accuracy, 0.83 AUC), from T2 fat (78% of accuracy, 0.86 AUC), and from T2 glands (78% of accuracy, 0.97 AUC). The combination of the three sequences in the nodule evaluation was more accurate compared with the single sequences (88%). Combining all the nodule features with gland and PPAT features, an accuracy of 89% with AUC near 1 was obtained. Compared with the analysis of the nodule and the PPAT, the whole-gland evaluation had the best performance (p ≤ 0.05) in predicting LNS when compared with the nodule. Conclusions: Precise nodal staging is essential for PCa patients’ prognosis and therapeutic strategy. When compared with a radiologist’s assessment, radiomics models enhance the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node staging for prostate cancer. Although data are still lacking, deep learning models may be able to further improve on this.