journal article·2025-05-12Open access

A Novel MCDM Approach to Integrating Human Factors into Evacuation Models: Enhancing Emergency Preparedness for Vulnerable Populations

Pedro Reyes-Norambuena, Javier Martinez-Torres, Alberto Adrego Pinto, Amir Karbassi Yazdi, Thomas Hanne

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

This research determines how to integrate factors related to evacuation in emergency preparedness using techniques for Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM). A distinctive MCDM technique that incorporates human behavior into evacuation models enhances decision-making and safety during emergencies, especially in vulnerable populations. For this purpose, a hybrid combination of MCDM methods—CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS)—is used to rank the vulnerability of Chilean regions by considering various factors. First, the related factors are ranked by CRITIC, and the result is that the “psychosocial problem” factor has the highest priority and weight. Then, according to the hybrid methods and CRITIC, all regions of Chile are ranked first with TOPSIS, WASPAS, and a combination of them to determine which one has the highest priority. The results show that the Santiago Metropolitan Region has the highest priority for vulnerability in all three methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile

Department of Applied Mathematics I, Telecommunications Engineering School, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain

DM and LIAAD-INESC TEC, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal

Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile

Institute for Information Systems, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, 4600 Olten, Switzerland

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. (2025, May 08). United Nations Shifting Demographics. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/un75/shifting-demographics.
2. Numerical Investigation on Fire Accident and Evacuation in a Urban for Different Traffic Conditions10.1016/j.tust.2020.103751 ↗
3. Experimental Investigation on the Evacuation Performance of pedestrians in a Three-Lane Urban Tunnel with Natural Ventilation in a Fire Scenario10.1016/j.tust.2020.103634 ↗
4. SIMCD: SIMulated Crowd Data for Anomaly Detection and Prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117475 ↗
5. Crivellari, A., and Beinat, E. (2020). LSTM-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Individual Mobility Traces of Short-Term Foreign Tourists. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12010349 ↗
6. ‘Herding’ in Direction Choice-Making during Collective Escape of Crowds: How Likely Is It and What Moderates It?10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.034 ↗
7. Learning Crowd Behavior from Real Data: A Residual Network Method for Crowd Simulation10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.141 ↗
8. Li, Z., Qiu, S., Wang, X., and Zhao, L. (2022). Modeling and Simulation of Crowd Pre-Evacuation Decision-Making in Complex Traffic Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192416664 ↗
9. Enhancing Emergency Pedestrian Safety through Flow Rate Design: Bayesian-Nash Equilibrium in Multi-Agent System10.1016/j.cie.2019.106058 ↗
10. Zhao, G., Li, C., Xu, G., He, F., and Zhang, J. (2021). A High-Density Crowd State Judgment Model Based on Entropy Theory. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0255468 ↗
11. Incorporating Human Factors in Emergency Evacuation-An Overview of behavioral Factors and Models10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102254 ↗
12. Optimising Crowd Evacuations: Mathematical, Architectural and behavioural Approaches10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104745 ↗
13. Centralized Embedding Hypersphere Feature Learning for Person Re-Identification10.1080/13682199.2019.1647947 ↗
14. A Novel Method for the Risk Assessment of Human Evacuation from Cruise in Maritime Transportation10.1016/j.ress.2022.108887 ↗
15. GIS-Based MCDM Framework Combined with Coupled Multi-Hazard assessment for Site Selection of Post-Earthquake Emergency Medical Service in Wenchuan, China10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102873 ↗
16. Statistical Analysis for Study of the Effect of Dark Clothing Color of Female Pedestrians on the Severity of Accident Using Machine Learning10.1155/2021/5567638 ↗
17. Exit Choice in Built Environment Evacuation Combining Immersive Virtual and Discrete Choice Modelling10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104452 ↗
18. Determining Optimum Staged-Evacuation Schedule Considering Total Time, Congestion Severity and Fire Threats10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105211 ↗
19. Livelihood Capital, Evacuation and Relocation Willingness of residents in Earthquake-Stricken Areas of Rural China10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105350 ↗
20. Evidence-Based Guidelines for Protective Actions and Earthquake Early Systems10.1190/geo2021-0222.1 ↗
21. A Systematic Review of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence applications in Natural Disasters10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109409 ↗
22. Location-Allocation Modeling for Emergency Evacuation Planning with GIS and Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Northeast Bangladesh10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.022 ↗
23. Mobile Phone Location Data for Disasters: A Review from Natural hazards and Epidemics10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101777 ↗
24. A Mixed Method Study of Hurricane Evacuation: Demographic Predictors for Stated Compliance to Voluntary and Mandatory Orders10.1080/17477891.2016.1140630 ↗
25. The Logistics of Household Hurricane Evacuation10.1007/s11069-011-9715-x ↗
26. How to Evacuate: Model for Understanding the Routing Strategies during Hurricane Evacuation10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000613 ↗
27. Analysis of Evacuation Behavior in a Wildfire Event10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033 ↗
28. Heading for Higher Ground: Factors Affecting Real and Hypothetical Hurricane Evacuation Behavior110.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4 ↗
29. A Random-Parameter Hazard-Based Model to Understand Household Evacuation Timing Behavior10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.005 ↗
30. Analysis of Child Pick-up during Daily Routines and for Daytime No-Notice Evacuations10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003 ↗
31. Evacuating Together or Separately: Factors Influencing Split Evacuations Prior to Hurricane Rita10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000226 ↗
32. Analysis of Hurricane Evacuee Mode Choice Behavior10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.008 ↗
33. One Million Dollars per Mile? The Opportunity Costs of Hurricane Evacuation10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2003.11.001 ↗
34. An Agent-Based Modeling System for Travel Demand Simulation for Hurricane Evacuation10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.015 ↗
35. An Empirical Evaluation of the Determinants of Tourist’s Hurricane Evacuation Decision Making
36. Deka, D., and Carnegie, J. (2012). Analyzing Evacuation Behavior of Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations in Northern New Jersey, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
37. Behavioral Model to Understand Household-Level Hurricane Evacuation Decision Making10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000223 ↗
38. Confidence, Knowledge, and Compliance with Emergency Evacuation10.1080/13669877.2014.880728 ↗
39. How Risk Perceptions Influence Evacuations from Hurricanes and Compliance with Government Directives10.1111/psj.12019 ↗
40. Who Evacuates When Hurricanes Approach? The Role of Risk, Information, and Location*10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00721.x ↗
41. Application of Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model in Selecting Hospital Site10.1186/s43093-023-00185-5 ↗
42. Ali, R., Hussain, A., Nazir, S., Khan, S., and Khan, H.U. (2023). Intelligent Decision Support Systems-An Analysis of Machine Learning and Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212426 ↗
43. A Comprehensive Review on Applications of Multicriteria Decision-Making in Power and Energy Systems10.1002/er.7517 ↗
44. Costa, J., and Silva, M. (2024). Multicriteria Decision-Making in Public Security: A Systematic Review. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12111754 ↗
45. Integrating Multicriteria Decision Making and Principal Component: A Systematic Literature Review10.1080/23311916.2024.2374944 ↗
46. The Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Decision Making in Healthcare: An Updated Systematic Literature Review10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.007 ↗
47. Multicriteria Decision Making in Sustainable Tourism and Low-Carbon Research: A Systematic Literature Review10.37741/t.71.3.2 ↗
48. A Recent Trend on Additive Manufacturing Sustainability with Supply Management Concept, Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques10.1155/2022/9151839 ↗
49. Deep Learning Algorithms and Multicriteria Decision-Making Used in Big: A Systematic Literature Review
50. A State-of-the-Art Review and Meta-Analysis on Sustainable Supply Chain: Future Research Directions10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 ↗
51. Combining Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods with Building Modelling (BIM): A Review10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103451 ↗
52. Chandrawati, T.B., Ratna, A.A.P., and Sari, R.F. (2020). Path Selection Using Fuzzy Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control, 15.10.15837/ijccc.2020.5.3978 ↗
53. A Multi-Criteria-Based Procedure for the Robust Definition of Algorithms at Fast Seismic Risk Assessment of Existing RC Buildings10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.048 ↗
54. Chanthakhot, W., and Ransikarbum, K. (2021). Integrated IEW-TOPSIS and Fire Dynamics Simulation for Agent-Based Modeling in Industrial Safety. Safety, 7.10.3390/safety7020047 ↗
55. Goswami, S.S., Behera, D.K., Afzal, A., Razak Kaladgi, A., Khan, S.A., Rajendran, P., Subbiah, R., and Asif, M. (2021). Analysis of a Robot Selection Problem Using Two Newly Developed Hybrid Models of TOPSIS-ARAS and COPRAS-ARAS. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13081331 ↗
56. Krishnan, A.R., Kasim, M.M., Hamid, R., and Ghazali, M.F. (2021). A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13060973 ↗
57. Mojtahedi, M., Sunindijo, R.Y., Lestari, F., and Wijaya, O. (2021). Developing Hospital Emergency and Disaster Management Index Using TOPSIS. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13095213 ↗
58. Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Yao, T., Wong, K., Tsou, J.Y., and Zhang, Y. (2021). A GIS-Based System for Spatial-Temporal Availability Evaluation of the Open Spaces Used as Emergency Shelters: The Case of Victoria, British, Canada. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10020063 ↗
59. Site Selection Decision Framework for Photovoltaic Hydrogen Production Using BWM-CRITIC-MABAC: A Case Study in Zhangjiakou10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129233 ↗
60. An Effective Blockchain Evaluation System Based on Entropy-CRITIC Weight and MCDM Techniques10.1007/s12083-021-01173-8 ↗
61. A Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy MARCOS Method Using Novel Score Function and its Application to Solid Waste Management10.1007/s10489-021-02921-2 ↗
62. A Novel Picture Fuzzy CRITIC & REGIME Methodology: Wearable Health Application10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104942 ↗
63. Modeling Evacuation Decisions in the 2019 Kincade Fire in California10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105541 ↗
64. Lu, H., Zhao, Y., Zhou, X., and Wei, Z. (2022). Selection of Agricultural Machinery Based on Improved CRITIC-Entropy and GRA-TOPSIS Method. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10020266 ↗
65. New Complex Proportional Assessment Approach Using Einstein Aggregation and Improved Score Function for Interval-Valued Fermatean Sets10.1016/j.cie.2022.108165 ↗
66. Evaluation of Emergency Evacuation Capacity of Urban Metro Stations on Combined Weights and TOPSIS-GRA Method in Intuitive Fuzzy10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103864 ↗
67. Objective Methods for Determining Criteria Weight Coefficients: A Modification of the CRITIC Method10.31181/dmame2003149z ↗
68. Applications of WASPAS Method as a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tool
69. Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment
70. Selection of Facade’s Alternatives of Commercial and Public Buildings Based on Multiple Criteria/Komercinės ir Viešosios Paskirties Pastatų Fasado Alternatyvų Daugiakriterinė Atranka10.3846/1648715X.2011.586532 ↗
71. (2025, May 08). World Bank Group—Data Population, Total—Chile. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=CL.
72. Rodriguez Garrido, P., and Goberna-Tricas, J. (2021). Birth Cultures: A Qualitative Approach to Home Birthing in Chile. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0249224 ↗
73. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2025, May 10). Censo de Población y Vivienda. Available online: https://www.ine.gob.cl/estadisticas/sociales/censos-de-poblacion-y-vivienda.
74. Pedestrian Counterflow in a Floor Field Cellular Automaton Model Coupled with an Evolutionary Game10.1088/1742-5468/ac8152 ↗
75. Behavioral Patterns of Children during Emergency Evacuations: A Analysis of Experimental Observations and Simulation Results10.1088/1742-5468/ad363b ↗
76. Mora, S. (2009). Disasters Are Not Natural: Risk Management, a Tool for Development, Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publications.10.1144/EGSP22.7 ↗
77. Social and Political Trust in a Low Trust Society10.1007/s11109-021-09762-2 ↗
78. Cordero, R.R., Feron, S., Damiani, A., Carrasco, J., Karas, C., Wang, C., Kraamwinkel, C.T., and Beaulieu, A. (2024). Extreme Fire Weather in Chile Driven by Climate Change and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-52481-x ↗
79. McWethy, D.B., Garreaud, R.D., Holz, A., and Pederson, G.T. (2021). Broad-Scale Surface and Atmospheric Conditions during Large Fires in South-Central Chile. Fire, 4.10.3390/fire4020028 ↗
80. The 2010–2015 Megadrought and Its Influence on the Fire Regime in Central and South-central Chile10.1002/ecs2.2300 ↗