journal article·2025-05-09Open access

A Dynamic Evaluation Method for Collaborative Search Efficiency of Multi-Sonar Systems Under Uncertain Situations

Shizhe Wang, Weiyi Chen, Zongji Li, Xu Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

In sonar collaborative search tasks, effectively evaluating the collaborative search efficiency is an important way to measure whether a task can be successful, which can also provide strong support for optimizing search schemes. In complex marine environments, sonar collaboration search faces challenges such as uncertain task scenes and real-time changing situations. Traditional evaluation methods cannot meet the evaluation requirements in these tasks since they do not analyze the involved dynamic modeling process. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose a novel evaluation method for sonar collaborative search efficiency based on adaptive information fusion and dynamic deduction. Specifically, we develop an information fusion method for multi-sensor detection based on adaptive weight calculation first, weights are assigned to each sensor based on the real-time changing detection probability to obtain more accurate detection probability fusion results. Then, we introduce the Monte Carlo sampling concept to establish an efficiency evaluation model based on the information fusion results. It discretizes the sonar search path and target motion trajectory in the time and space, and calculates the sonar detection efficiency point by point, which can overcome the challenge of uncertain situation conditions due to the uncertainty of target motion by dynamic spatial-temporal deduction. Compared with the average weighted fusion method, the variance of the proposed adaptive fusion method decreases from 0.01 to 0.0071, which proves its better stability. The results of the one-sample t-test indicate that at the level of α=0.05, there is a significant difference between the average detection probability and the random probability of 0.5, indicating statistical significance. Moreover, we verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in fully-passive and multi-base working modes, and compare the impact of each sonar on the overall detection capability of the multi-sonar system, which also demonstrates the advantages and reliability of the new model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Optimization and Search Problems · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China

Naval Research Institute, Beijing 100036, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. A survey of maritime unmanned search system: Theory, applications and future directions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115359 ↗
2. Development of the USV ‘JingHai-I’and sea trials in the Southern Yellow Sea10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.001 ↗
3. Zhou, Z., Li, M., and Hao, Y. (2023). A Novel Region-Construction Method for Multi-USV Cooperative Target Allocation in Air–Ocean Integrated Environments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11071369 ↗
4. Chen, Z., Zhao, Z., Xu, J., Wang, X., Lu, Y., and Yu, J. (2023). A cooperative hunting method for multi-usv based on the a* algorithm in an environment with obstacles. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23167058 ↗
5. Liu, J., Guo, H., Liu, X., and Pan, S. (2022, January 3–5). USV Cluster Cooperative Navigation Algorithm based on factor graph. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 6th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Beijing, China.10.1109/IAEAC54830.2022.9929590 ↗
6. Multi-USV cooperative path planning by window update based self-organizing map and spectral clustering10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114140 ↗
7. A review on UAV autonomous combat effectiveness evaluation techniques
8. Jiang, W., Chen, Z., Wu, Y., Hua, B., and Zhao, X. (2022, January 23–25). Research on Combat Effectiveness Evaluation of UAV Swarm Based on AHP-FCE. Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, Xi’an, China.10.1007/978-981-99-0479-2_153 ↗
9. Operational effectiveness evaluation of the swarming UAVs combat system based on a system dynamics model10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898728 ↗
10. Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Cooperative Combat Effectiveness Based on Conditional Entropy Combination Weight Method10.1590/jatm.v13.1227 ↗
11. Multi-attacks effectiveness evaluation of UUV based on wake guidance10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112654 ↗
12. An MMCW-FCE method for evaluating AUV intelligence on the algorithm level10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3229681 ↗
13. Liu, J.y., Sun, L.n., and Zhao, Z.m. (2022, January 23–25). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cluster Distributed Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Based on DoDAF. Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems, Xi’an, China.10.1007/978-981-99-0479-2_211 ↗
14. Reconnaissance Efficiency of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Based on SEA
15. Effectiveness evaluation for multiple unmanned surface vehicles cooperative combat based on GA-BP neural network
16. Yuanming, D., Chengyang, L., Qian, L., and Min, Z. (2019, January 3–5). Effectiveness evaluation of UUV cooperative combat based on GAPSO-BP neural network. Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Nanchang, China.10.1109/CCDC.2019.8833162 ↗
17. Optimal search path planning of UUV in battlefeld ambush scene10.1016/j.dt.2023.03.018 ↗
18. Wei, K., Fang, S., and Tao, J. (2022). Enhanced Near-Field Interference Suppression Scheme for the Non-Cooperative Underwater Acoustic Pulse Detection of the Towed Linear Array. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10020250 ↗
19. Yang, M., Han, D., and Li, N. (2022, January 9–13). Noise Suppression of Towed Line Array Sonar Platform Based on Spatial Filtering Technique. Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, Online.10.1088/1742-6596/2363/1/012005 ↗
20. Ji, H., Hu, H., and Peng, X. (2022). Multi-underwater gliders coverage path planning based on ant colony optimization. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11193021 ↗
21. Research on Underwater Collaborative Detection Method Based on Complex Marine Environment10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3348782 ↗
22. Guo, L., Liu, T., Zou, J., Zhou, Q., and Sheng, X. (2018, January 3–5). Research on performance analysis and optimization methods of bistatic collaborative detection. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems, Shenzhen, China.10.1145/3291940.3291986 ↗
23. Li, M., Liu, K., Li, H., Sun, Y., Chen, X., and Mao, K. (2023). Quantitative analysis on the influence of the oceanic front on underwater acoustic detection with investigated marine data. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11081574 ↗
24. Sheng, X., Lu, J., Dong, W., YIn, J., Guo, L., and Wu, X. (2014, January 11–13). The research on the coverage area of multistatic sonar in various working modes. Proceedings of the Meetings on Acoustics, AIP Publishing, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.10.1121/1.4890017 ↗
25. Array Optimization of Multistatic Sonar Buoy Sensors and Its Application in Submarine Search10.1109/JSEN.2024.3508742 ↗
26. Effective deployment strategies for optimizing area coverage in multistatic sonar detection based on Cassini oval approximation and a virtual force algorithm10.1016/j.asej.2024.103147 ↗
27. Zhao, Y., Qin, R., Liu, S., and Zhang, W. (2024, January 21–23). Impact of Typhoon Noise on the Detection Performance of Multi-Static Sonobuoy Array. Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), Zhoushan, China.10.1109/ICICSP62589.2024.10809198 ↗
28. Zhang, Y., and Zhang, X. (2024, January 19–22). A Study on Multistatic Sonar Localization Method with Consideration of AUV Mobility. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), Bali, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSPCC62635.2024.10770524 ↗
29. A High Resolution Algorithm of Direct Path Interference Suppression for Bistatic Sonar
30. Thurman, E., Riordan, J., and Toal, D. (2009). Multi-sonar integration and the advent of senor intelligence. Advances in Sonar Technology, I-Tech Education and Publishing.10.5772/39412 ↗
31. Multisensor information fusion: Future of environmental perception in intelligent vehicles10.26599/JICV.2023.9210049 ↗
32. Bearing fault diagnosis based on deep belief network and multisensor information fusion
33. Mix-VAEs: A novel multisensor information fusion model for intelligent fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.044 ↗
34. Multi-sensor information fusion estimators for stochastic uncertain systems with correlated noises10.1016/j.inffus.2015.06.001 ↗
35. Multi-sensor information fusion based on machine learning for real applications in human activity recognition: State-of-the-art and research challenges10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.006 ↗
36. Dong, Y., Zhang, G., He, X., and Tang, J. (2015, January 18–21). Information fusion in networked underwater target detection. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2015, Genova, Italy.10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271553 ↗
37. Platform Path Optimization Method Based on Cumulative Detection Probability of Sonar Search
38. Analysis of the hydraulic connection of the Plitvica stream and the groundwater of the Varaždin alluvial aquifer10.15233/gfz.2021.38.3 ↗
39. Da, C., Hu, L., Shen, B., Yang, Y., Wan, S., and Song, J. (2022). Theoretical Study and Numerical Experiment on the Influence of Trend Changes on Correlation Coefficient. Atmosphere, 13.10.3390/atmos13010066 ↗
40. Ruiz-Abellon, M.d.C., Gabaldón, A., and Guillamón, A. (2016). Dependency-aware clustering of time series and its application on energy markets. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9100809 ↗
41. Quantifying the non-linear dependence of energetic electron fluxes in the Earth’s radiation belts with radial diffusion drivers10.5194/angeo-40-37-2022 ↗
42. Whitnall, C., and Oswald, E. (2011, January 14–18). A comprehensive evaluation of mutual information analysis using a fair evaluation framework. Proceedings of the Annual Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_18 ↗
43. Evaluation criteria based on mutual information for classifications including rejected class
44. A method for combining mutual information and canonical correlation analysis: Predictive mutual information and its use in feature selection10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.020 ↗
45. Feature selection based on mutual information with correlation coefficient10.1007/s10489-021-02524-x ↗
46. Mutual information-based feature selection for intrusion detection systems10.1016/j.jnca.2011.01.002 ↗