journal article·2025-05-06Open access

Comparison Between Longitudinal and Transverse Shaking of Culvert–Frame Combined Underground Structure

Yong Yuan, Xuzhao Lan, Weifeng Wu, Xiuzhi Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

Owing to the special configurations of the culvert–frame combined underground structure, discrepant responses at different portions of the structure arise when earthquakes strike in the longitudinal direction. This paper presents other experiments when shaking along the lateral direction and comparing structural dynamic responses between these two cases. Data on accelerations and culvert joint displacements were presented under a series of 1 g shaking tests, that is, five synthetic earthquake motions between white noise cases. Comparing the seismic responses of the culvert–frame structure under varying intensities of excitations gave findings that, with respect to longitudinal excitation, the acceleration responses of the model soil were increased under transverse excitations. For the model structure, the acceleration responses under longitudinal excitations were larger than those of transverse excitations. A significant difference in the displacement of the culvert joint was observed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Shanghai Tongji Green Building Prefabrication Construction Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering & Rail Transit Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 200092, China

Shanghai Shentong Metro Construction Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · Shanghai Sailing Program

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. The Design and Construction of a Large Composite Subway Station in Limited Space: An Exemplary Application of OCUE Method in Xuzhou, China10.1088/1755-1315/703/1/012024 ↗
2. Geological Hazards During Construction and Operation of Shallow Subway Stations and Tunnels by the Example of the Kharkiv Metro (1968–2018)10.15273/ijge.2018.04.030 ↗
3. A New Construction Method for Metro Stations in Dense Urban Areas in Shanghai Soft Ground: Open-Cut Shafts Combined with Quasi-Rectangular Jacking Boxes10.1016/j.tust.2022.104530 ↗
4. Influence of Soil Liquefaction on the Seismic Response of a Subway Station in Model Tests10.1007/s10064-015-0777-y ↗
5. Isolation Mechanism of a Subway Station Structure with Flexible Devices at Column Ends Obtained in Shaking-Table Tests10.1016/j.tust.2020.103328 ↗
6. Seismic Responses of a Large Unequal-Span Underground Subway Station in Liquefiable Soil Using Shaking Table Test10.1080/13632469.2021.1991523 ↗
7. Seismic Response and Failure Mechanism of Underground Frame Structures Based on Dynamic Centrifuge Tests10.1002/eqe.3434 ↗
8. Shaking Table Test for Near-Valley Subway Station—Part I: Seismic Site Effects10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108064 ↗
9. Shaking Table Test for Near-Valley Subway Station—Part II: Seismic Response of the Station10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108065 ↗
10. Application of EPS Geofoam below Soil–Steel Composite Bridge Subjected to Seismic Excitations10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12674 ↗
11. Effect of the Soil Cover Depth on the Seismic Response in a Large-Span Thin-Walled Corrugated Steel Plate Bridge10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107744 ↗
12. Seismic Vulnerability of a Soil-Steel Composite Tunnel—Norway Tolpinrud Railway Tunnel Case Study10.1016/j.tust.2020.103808 ↗
13. Response of Buried Pipeline to Non-Uniform Longitudinal and Transverse Ground Motions10.1080/13632469.2023.2220038 ↗
14. Evaluation of Seismic Behavior of Box Culvert Buried in the Ground through Centrifuge Model Tests and Numerical Analysis10.1016/j.undsp.2018.09.007 ↗
15. A Study on the Seismic Behavior of Shield Tunnel Including Shaft in Longitudinal Direction
16. Yoo, C., Park, S.W., Kim, B., and Ban, H. (2014, January 25–27). E-Defense Shaking Test on Large Model of Underground Shaft and Tunnels. Proceedings of the Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1201/b17240 ↗
17. Dynamic Behaviors of Underground Structures in E-Defense Shaking Experiments10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.008 ↗
18. Experimental Study on the Seismic Response of Subway Station in Soft Ground10.1142/S1793431117500208 ↗
19. Seismic Responses of a Subway Station and Tunnel in a Slightly Inclined Liquefiable Ground through Shaking Table Test10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.051 ↗
20. Shaking Table Tests on Discrepant Responses of Shaft-Tunnel Junction in Soft Soil under Transverse Excitations10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.013 ↗
21. Seismic Performance of a Subway Station-Tunnel Junction Structure: A Shaking Table Investigation and Numerical Analysis10.1007/s12205-021-1169-4 ↗
22. Seismic Response of Subway Station-Tunnel with Expansion Joint Connection in Liquefiable Soil10.1016/j.tust.2025.106477 ↗
23. Shaking Table Tests on the Intersection of Cross Passage and Twin Tunnels10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.05.035 ↗
24. Shaking Table Tests on Shaft-Tunnel Junction under Longitudinal Excitations10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106055 ↗
25. Wang, J.-N. (1993). Seismic Design of Tunnels A Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas Inc.
26. An Evaluation Method of Longitudinal Stiffness of Shield Tunnel Linings for Application to Seismic Response Analyses10.2208/jscej.1988.398_319 ↗
27. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson. [1st ed.].
28. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of the Effect of Buried Box Culverts on Earthquake Excitation10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.015 ↗
29. Calibration of Strain Gauged Square Tunnels for Centrifuge Testing10.1007/s10706-016-0015-9 ↗
30. Dynamic Response of Flexible Square Tunnels: Centrifuge Testing and Validation of Existing Design Methodologies10.1680/geot.SIP.15.P.004 ↗
31. Seismic Response of Box-Type Tunnels in Soft Soil: Experimental and Numerical Investigation10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.008 ↗