journal article·2025-05-02Open access

AV-Teller: Browser Fingerprinting for Client-Side Security Software Identification

Hyeong-Seok Jang, Mohsen Ali Alawami, Ki-Woong Park

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of digitalization and the growing reliance on internet-based technologies by individuals and organizations have led to a significant escalation in the frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks. As attackers continuously refine their methods to evade conventional defense mechanisms, antivirus solutions, despite their widespread utilization as primary security tools, face increasing challenges in addressing these evolving threats. This study introduces AV-Teller, a novel framework designed for analyzing antivirus behavior through interactions with web browsers. AV-Teller reveals weaknesses in antivirus detection mechanisms by highlighting ways in which web browser interactions may inadvertently expose critical aspects of antivirus operations. The framework provides key insights into the vulnerabilities inherent to these detection processes and their implications for the interplay between antivirus systems and modern web technologies. To assess the efficacy of the AV-Teller in detecting antivirus via web browsers, the framework evaluates three detection scenarios: Document Object Model (DOM) Monitoring-Based Detection, Signature-Based Detection, and Phishing Page-Based Detection. The results revealed performance inconsistencies: 16 products (57%) failed to respond to any tested scenarios, exhibiting deficiencies in threat mitigation capabilities. Of the 12 products (43%) that successfully handled three scenarios, 9 (75%) inadvertently disclosed identifiable antivirus metadata during assessments, thereby enabling attackers to pinpoint specific antivirus solutions and exploit their vulnerabilities. These findings highlight critical gaps in the interaction between antivirus systems and web technologies, exposing systemic flaws in existing security mechanisms. The inadvertent exposure of sensitive antivirus data underscores the necessity for robust data handling protocols, necessitating collaboration between antivirus developers and web technology stakeholders to design secure frameworks. By exposing these risks, the AV-Teller framework elucidates the limitations of current defenses and establishes a foundation for the enhancement of antivirus technologies to address emerging cyber threats effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Digital and Cyber Forensics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SysCore Laboratory, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea

Division of Computer Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Republic of Korea

Department of Information Security, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Statista (2025, March 12). Worldwide Visits to Google.com from October 2023 to March 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/268252/web-visitor-traffic-to-googlecom.
2. Navigating the cyber security landscape: A comprehensive review of cyber-attacks, emerging trends, and recent developments
3. Murali, R.J., K, B.S.S.S., and Raj, S.O.N.N. (2024, January 4–5). An Extensive Examination of Cyber Attacks and Cyber Security, Encompassing Recent Advancements and Emerging Trends. Proceedings of the 2024 Ninth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICONSTEM60960.2024.10568588 ↗
4. Cyber-attacks–trends, patterns and security countermeasures10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01077-1 ↗
5. Zero-Day Exploits and Vulnerability Management
6. Sarkar, S., Choudhary, G., Shandilya, S.K., Hussain, A., and Kim, H. (2022). Security of zero trust networks in cloud computing: A comparative review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141811213 ↗
7. Zero-day attack path identification using probabilistic and graph approach based back propagation neural network in cloud
8. Cyber Attacks and Defense: AI-Driven Approaches and Techniques
9. The emerging threat of ai-driven cyber attacks: A review10.1080/08839514.2022.2037254 ↗
10. Weaponized AI for cyber attacks
11. A Comprehensive Survey on Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) Detection Techniques
12. Advanced persistent threats (apt): Evolution, anatomy, attribution and countermeasures10.1007/s12652-023-04603-y ↗
13. Securing against apts: Advancements in detection and mitigation
14. Orchestration of APT malware evasive manoeuvers employed for eluding anti-virus and sandbox defense10.1016/j.cose.2022.102627 ↗
15. Defending novice user privacy: An evaluation of default web browser configurations10.1016/j.cose.2024.103784 ↗
16. Sim, K., Heo, H., and Cho, H. (2024). Combating Web Tracking: Analyzing Web Tracking Technologies for User Privacy. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16100363 ↗
17. Lin, X., Araujo, F., Taylor, T., Jang, J., and Polakis, J. (2023, January 21–25). Fashion faux pas: Implicit stylistic fingerprints for bypassing browsers’ anti-fingerprinting defenses. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179437 ↗
18. HEAVEN: A Hardware-Enhanced AntiVirus ENgine to accelerate real-time, signature-based malware detection10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117083 ↗
19. Advanced techniques of malware evasion and bypass in the age of antivirus
20. Effective detection of vulnerable and malicious browser extensions10.1016/j.cose.2014.06.005 ↗
21. Tsirantonakis, G., Ilia, P., Ioannidis, S., Athanasopoulos, E., and Polychronakis, M. (2018, January 18–21). A Large-scale Analysis of Content Modification by Open HTTP Proxies. Proceedings of the NDSS, San Diego, CA, USA.10.14722/ndss.2018.23244 ↗
22. MDN Web Docs (2025, March 12). Document Object Model (DOM). Available online: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document_Object_Model.
23. Iqbal, J., Kaur, R., and Stakhanova, N. (2019, January 26–29). PoliDOM: Mitigation of DOM-XSS by detection and prevention of unauthorized DOM tampering. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Canterbury, UK.10.1145/3339252.3339257 ↗
24. MDN Web Docs (2025, March 12). MutationObserver. Available online: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MutationObserver.
25. Zaini, A., and Zainal, A. (2019). Exploiting DOM Mutation for the Detection of Ad-injecting Browser Extension. Recent Trends in Data Science and Soft Computing, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology (IRICT 2018), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23–24 June 2018, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_61 ↗
26. Khodayari, S., and Pellegrino, G. (2023, January 22–24). It’s (dom) clobbering time: Attack techniques, prevalence, and defenses. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179403 ↗
27. EICAR (European Institute for Computer Antivirus Research) (2025, March 12). Main Page for Anti-Malware Research. Available online: https://www.eicar.org.
28. EICAR (European Institute for Computer Antivirus Research) (2025, March 12). Anti Malware Testfile. Available online: https://www.eicar.org/download-anti-malware-testfile/.
29. AMTSO (2025, March 12). Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization, Main Page for Anti-Malware and Phishing Test Tools. Available online: https://www.amtso.org/.
30. AMTSO (2025, March 12). Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization, Phishing Test Page. Available online: https://www.amtso.org/feature-settings-check-phishing-page/.
31. AV-TEST (2025, March 12). The Independent IT-Security Institute. Available online: https://www.av-test.org.
32. VirusTotal (2025, March 12). Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner. Available online: https://www.virustotal.com.
33. Browser fingerprinting: A survey10.1145/3386040 ↗
34. Englehardt, S., and Narayanan, A. (2016, January 24–28). Online tracking: A 1-million-site measurement and analysis. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2976749.2978313 ↗
35. Karami, S., Ilia, P., Solomos, K., and Polakis, J. (2020, January 23–26). Carnus: Exploring the Privacy Threats of Browser Extension Fingerprinting. Proceedings of the 27th Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), San Diego, CA, USA.10.14722/ndss.2020.24383 ↗
36. A survey of browser fingerprint research and application10.1155/2022/3363335 ↗
37. Nikiforakis, N., Kapravelos, A., Joosen, W., Kruegel, C., Piessens, F., and Vigna, G. (2013, January 19–22). Cookieless monster: Exploring the ecosystem of web-based device fingerprinting. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Berkeley, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2013.43 ↗
38. Statcounter GlobalStats (2025, March 12). Desktop Browser Market Share Worldwide. Available online: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/desktop/worldwide.