Influence of Girder Flaring on Load Effect in Girders of Composite Steel Bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
A flared or splayed girder bridge is a structure made up of a concrete slab on girders with linearly varying spacing along the length. For such an irregular bridge, the girder distribution factors in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications are not applicable. In lieu of using a refined method of analysis, the study at hand proposes a simple approach for computing the dead and live load effect in the girders. To do so, fifteen composite steel girder bridges are analyzed by the finite element method to determine the influence of the girder flaring angle, girder spacing, number of girders, deck slab thickness, span length, girder stiffness, and presence of cross-bracing on the load distribution within the bridge. This study showed that the tributary width concept is a reliable approach for determining the dead load effect on the splayed girders, especially for the case of shored construction. The girder distribution factors for flexure in the AASHTO specifications can be reasonably utilized for such irregular bridges if the girder spacing at the location of each truck axle is considered, leading to a maximum of 14% difference on the conservative side between the AASHTO approach and the finite element analysis. On the other hand, the lever rule can provide a good estimate of the live load distribution among the splayed girders when subjected to shear, as the maximum safe deviation from the finite element outcome in this situation is less than 10%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Engineering Structural Analysis Methods · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ABNA, 4140 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates
Funding
the Open Access Program and the College of Engineering at the American University of Sharjah, UAE
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (2020). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [9th ed.].
2. Buckler, J.G., Barton, F.W., Gomez, J.P., Massarelli, P.J., and McKeel, W.T. (2000). Effect of Girder Spacing on Bridge Deck Response, Final Rep., VTRC 01-R6.
3. Shear live-load distribution factors for I-girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(197) ↗
4. Approximate analysis of irregular slab-on-girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1997)2:1(11) ↗
5. Live-load distribution factors for concrete box-girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:5(273) ↗
6. Puckett, J.A., Mertz, D., Huo, X.S., Jablin, M.C., Peavy, M.D., and Patrick, M.D. (2007). Simplified Live Load Distribution Factor Equations, Transportation Research Board. NCHRP Rep.
7. Utah Department of Transportation (2014). Bridge Management Manual.
8. Kansas Department of Transportation (2009). LRFD Bridge Design.
9. (A. DARWin-ME, 2011). A. DARWin-ME, Version 1.0.
10. WSDOT (2009). PGSuper Software 2.1 Release.10.1109/IWSESS.2009.5068449 ↗
11. A review on the seismic behaviour of irregular bridges10.1680/jstbu.17.00081 ↗
12. Dynamic properties variation by irregular superstructure and substructure common bridges10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.526 ↗
13. Seismic Resilience of Concrete Bridges with Flared Columns10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.417 ↗
14. Live load distribution for steel girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489) ↗
15. (ANSYS, 2011). ANSYS, Version 14.0.
16. The use of eccentric beam elements in the analysis of slab-on-girder bridges10.12989/sem.1999.8.1.085 ↗
17. Live-load distribution factors in prestressed concrete girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298) ↗
18. Further studies on lateral load distribution using a finite element method
19. Determination of the dynamic characteristics of the Colquitz River Bridge by full-scale testing10.1139/l96-058 ↗
20. Distribution of vehicular loads on bridge girders by the FEA using ADINA: Modeling, simulation, and comparison10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00032-2 ↗
21. Live load distribution in girder bridges subject to oversized trucks10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:1(9) ↗
22. Wheel load distribution on simply supported skew I-beam composite bridges10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(399) ↗
23. Modeling technique for honeycomb FRP deck bridges via finite elements10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(572) ↗
24. Finite-element analysis of steel girder highway bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1997)2:3(83) ↗
25. Wu, H. (2003). Influence of Live-Load Deflections on Superstructure Performance of Slab on Steel Stringer Bridges, West Virginia University.
26. Effects of edge-stiffening elements and diaphragms on bridge resistance and load distribution10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(258) ↗
27. Hraib, F. (2015). Finite Element Analysis of Splayed Girder Bridges. [Master’s Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, American University of Sharjah]. Available online: https://repository.aus.edu/entities/publication/92989414-e0e1-4937-b64c-20150599b82b.
28. Fang, K.I. (1985). Behavior of Ontario-Type Bridge Deck on Steel Girders. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin].
29. Schonwetter, P. (1999). Field Testing and Load Rating of a Steel-Girder Highway Bridge. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin].
30. Discussion on AASHTO LRFD load distribution factors for slab-on-girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2005)10:3(171) ↗