journal article·2025-04-18Open access

A Dynamic Assessment Methodology for Accident Occurrence Probabilities of Gas Distribution Station

Daqing Wang, Huirong Huang, Bin Wang, Shaowei Tian, Ping Liang, Weichao Yu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Gas distribution stations (GDSs), pivotal nodes in long-distance natural gas transportation networks, are susceptible to catastrophic fire and explosion accidents stemming from system failures, thereby emphasizing the urgency for robust safety measures. While previous studies have mainly focused on gas transmission pipelines, GDSs have received less attention, and existing risk assessment methodologies for GDSs may have limitations in providing accurate and reliable accident probability predictions and fault diagnoses, especially under data uncertainty. This paper introduces a novel dynamic accident probability assessment framework tailored for GDS under data uncertainty. By integrating Bayesian network (BN) modeling with fuzzy expert judgments, frequentist estimation, and Bayesian updating, the framework offers a comprehensive approach. It encompasses accident modeling, root event (RE) probability estimation, undesired event (UE) predictive analysis, probability adaptation, and accident diagnosis analysis. A case study demonstrates the framework’s reliability and effectiveness, revealing that the occurrence probability of major hazards like vapor cloud explosions and long-duration jet fires diminishes significantly with effective safety barriers. Crucially, the framework acknowledges the dynamic nature of risk by incorporating observed failure incidents or near-misses into the assessment, promptly adjusting risk indicators like UE probabilities and RE criticality. This underscores the importance for decision-makers to maintain a heightened awareness of these dynamics, enabling swift adjustments to maintenance strategies and resource allocation prioritization. By mitigating assessment uncertainty and enhancing precision in maintenance strategies, the framework represents a significant advancement in GDS safety management, ultimately striving to elevate safety and reliability standards, mitigate natural gas distribution risks, and safeguard public safety and the environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Petroleum Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Complicated Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Chongqing 401331, China

PIPECHINA Oil & Gas Control Center, Dongtucheng Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100007, China

Fujian Branch, National Petroleum and Natural Gas Pipeline Network Group Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350003, China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China · Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission · Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science and Technology

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluating risk and natural gas pipeline safety10.1111/polp.12211 ↗
2. Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis10.1016/j.jlp.2004.12.003 ↗
3. A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093 ↗
4. Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA)10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.011 ↗
5. Failure probability assessment of gas transmission pipelines based on historical failur+related data and modification factors10.1016/j.jngse.2018.01.049 ↗
6. Model for quantitative risk assessment on naturally ventilated metering-regulation stations for natural gas10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.028 ↗
7. An integrated methodology for assessing accident probability of natural gas distribution station with data uncertainty10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103941 ↗
8. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074 ↗
9. An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry10.1016/j.psep.2014.05.001 ↗
10. Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.022 ↗
11. Veitch Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis10.1016/j.psep.2009.07.003 ↗
12. Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing Fuzzy Event Tree Analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.004 ↗
13. Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.010 ↗
14. Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007 ↗
15. SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002 ↗
16. Hassellöv Bayesian updating in a fault tree model for shipwreck risk assessment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.033 ↗
17. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003 ↗
18. Dynamic and quantitative risk assessment of Cruise ship pod propulsion system failure: An integrated Type-2 Fuzzy-Bayesian approach10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114601 ↗
19. Remaining useful life re-prediction methodology based on Wiener process: Subsea Christmas tree system as a case study10.1016/j.cie.2020.106983 ↗
20. Jayasinghe Dynamic quantitative risk assessment of LNG bunkering SIMOPs based on Bayesian network10.1016/j.joes.2022.03.004 ↗
21. A dynamic quantitative risk assessment method for drilling well control by integrating multi types of risk factors10.1016/j.psep.2022.08.066 ↗
22. A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.015 ↗
23. Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN)10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.011 ↗
24. Risk assessment of general FPSO supply system based on hybrid fuzzy fault tree and Bayesian network10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118767 ↗
25. Optimizing natural gas pipeline risk assessment using hybrid fuzzy bayesian networks and expert elicitation for effective decision-making strategies10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205283 ↗
26. Insight process safety of a hydrogen turbine supply system: A comprehensive dynamic risk assessment using a fuzzy Bayesian network10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.332 ↗
27. Application of Bayesian networks in reliability assessment: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.istruc.2024.108098 ↗
28. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005 ↗
29. SINTEF Industrial Management (2015). Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, Oreda Participants.
30. Exida, L. (2005). Safety Equipment Reliability Handbook, Exida.
31. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1989). Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Data, with Data Tables, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, CCPS. [1st ed.].
32. Atwood, C., LaChance, J., Martz, H., Anderson, D., Englehardt, M., Whitehead, D., and Wheeler, T. (2003). Handbook of Parameter Estimation for Probabilistic Risk Assessment, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
33. Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.006 ↗