The Mechanically Destabilizing Effect of Increased Heel Height in Women Is Not Enhanced by Dual-Task Interference
Source abstract
Abstract
Postural balance deteriorates as heel height increases, but the dual-task interference effect has not been investigated. This observational cross-sectional study investigated the influence of two concurrent cognitive tasks on balance performance while wearing shoes with different heel heights. We hypothesized that the concurrent cognitive demands’ effect on balance deterioration would be more pronounced in shoes with increased heel height. Twenty-one women (21–54 years) were assessed for quiet stance balance performance while wearing shoes with low-, medium-and high-heel height. Cognitive interference on balance performance was investigated by a dual-task condition using a short memory (COGN_A) and verbal fluency (COGN_B) task. Balance performance was quantified by measuring center of pressure (CoP) path length and sway range, while errors made and scores in COGN_A and COGN_B assessed cognitive performance. Postural balance decreased as heel height increased with greater CoP path length and anteroposterior sway for the medium- and high-heeled shoes (p < 0.001). Cognitive load did not affect balance performance (p = 0.234–0.494), nor was there an interaction between cognitive load and balance with increasing heel height (p = 0.281–0.375). The results suggest that cognitive load does not limit postural balance with increasing heel height, and that balance is more affected by the increased mechanical demands of heel height.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Sport Medicine and Biology of Exercise, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Athens, Greece
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Athens, Greece
Department of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Berlin School of Movement Science, 10115 Berlin, Germany
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Postural alignment in barefoot and high-heeled stance10.1097/00007632-198805000-00018 ↗
2. High heeled shoes: Their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces10.1016/S0003-9993(21)01622-1 ↗
3. Influences of heel height on human postural stability and functional mobility between inexperienced and experienced high heel shoe wearers10.7717/peerj.10239 ↗
4. Influence of high-heeled shoes on the sagittal balance of the spine and the whole body10.1007/s00586-016-4621-2 ↗
5. Xu, D., Zhou, H., Quan, W., Ma, X., Chon, T.E., Fernandez, J., Gusztav, F., Kovács, A., Baker, J.S., and Gu, Y. (2024). New insights optimize landing strategies to reduce lower limb injury risk. Cyborg. Bionic. Syst., 5.10.34133/cbsystems.0126 ↗
6. Interference of high-heeled shoes in static balance among young women10.1016/j.humov.2012.02.005 ↗
7. The influence of high- and low-heeled shoes on balance in young women
8. Effects of heel height and high-heel experience on foot stability during quiet standing10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.004 ↗
9. Yamada-Yanagawa, A., Sasagawa, S., Nakazawa, K., and Ishii, N. (2022). Effects of Occasional and Habitual Wearing of High-Heeled Shoes on Static Balance in Young Women. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.760991 ↗
10. Is static balance affected by using shoes of different height?10.1515/bhk-2016-0020 ↗
11. Postural stability in young healthy subjects—Impact of reduced base of support, visual deprivation, dual tasking10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.01.005 ↗
12. Postural control and cognitive task performance in healthy participants while balancing on different support-surface configurations10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00130-8 ↗
13. Effects of high heeled shoes wearing experience and heel height on human standing balance and functional mobility10.1080/00140139.2015.1068956 ↗
14. Analysis of muscular fatigue and foot stability during high-heeled gait10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00180-1 ↗
15. Methodological and interpretive issues in posture-cognition dual-tasking in upright stance10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.002 ↗
16. Cortical control of postural responses10.1007/s00702-007-0657-0 ↗
17. Affordances as constraints on the control of stance10.1016/0167-9457(88)90014-0 ↗
18. Damos, D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. Multiple-Task Performance, Taylor-Francis. [1st ed.].
19. Schaefer, S. (2014). The ecological approach to cognitive-motor dual-tasking: Findings on the effects of expertise and age. Front. Psychol., 5.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01167 ↗
20. Brain activation during maintenance of standing postures in humans10.1093/brain/122.2.329 ↗
21. Absolute changes in regional cerebral blood flow in association with upright posture in humans: An orthostatic PET study
22. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?10.1093/ageing/afl077 ↗
23. Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control10.1152/jn.00516.2003 ↗
24. Roberts, T.D.M. (1995). Understanding Balance: The Mechanics of Posture and Locomotion, Chapman & Hall.
25. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: Models and posture-analysis methods10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.005 ↗
26. How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing10.1007/s00426-005-0018-2 ↗
27. Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00144-8 ↗
28. Attentional demands and postural control: The effect of sensory context10.1093/gerona/55.1.M10 ↗
29. Effect of cognitive task complexity on dual task postural stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s00221-021-06299-y ↗
30. Effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.2147/CIA.S125201 ↗
31. Increasing cognitive load with increasing balance challenge: Recipe for catastrophe10.1007/s00221-006-0519-2 ↗
32. Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task paradigms?10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00058-2 ↗
33. Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.617 ↗
34. The effects of concurrent cognitive tasks on postural sway in healthy subjects10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.011 ↗
35. The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls10.1093/gerona/52A.4.M232 ↗
36. Young and old adults prioritize dynamic stability control following gait perturbations when performing a concurrent cognitive task10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.08.005 ↗
37. Task-prioritization and balance recovery strategies used by young healthy adults during dual-task walking10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.04.010 ↗
38. Changes in Standing and Walking Performance Under Dual-Task Conditions Across the Lifespan10.1007/s40279-015-0369-9 ↗
39. Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization10.1002/mds.24963 ↗
40. A Mobile Device Dual-Task Paradigm for the Assessment of mTBI10.1093/milmed/usy334 ↗
41. Attentional demands of postural control: The ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.002 ↗
42. Dual-tasking postural control in patients with right brain damage10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.002 ↗
43. Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008 ↗
44. Effects of visual and auditory short-term memory tasks on the spatiotemporal dynamics and variability of postural sway10.3200/JMBR.37.4.311-324 ↗
45. Reliability measures of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Greek young adults
46. Measures of postural steadiness: Differences between healthy young and elderly adults10.1109/10.532130 ↗
47. Multiple resources and performance prediction10.1080/14639220210123806 ↗
48. Blanca, M.J., Arnau, J., García-Castro, F.J., Alarcón, R., and Bono, R. (2023). Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted F-tests when sphericity is violated: Which procedure is best?. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192453 ↗
49. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge. [2nd ed.].
50. Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: Increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.014 ↗
51. Effects of dual task difficulty in motor and cognitive performance: Differences between adults and adolescents10.1016/j.humov.2017.07.004 ↗
52. Review of balance recovery in response to external perturbations during daily activities10.1016/j.humov.2019.102546 ↗
53. Center of mass states render multijoint torques throughout standing balance recovery10.1152/jn.00367.2024 ↗
54. Predictive and reactive locomotor adaptability in healthy elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s40279-015-0413-9 ↗
55. The impact of cognitive-motor interference on balance and gait in hearing-impaired older adults: A systematic review10.1186/s11556-024-00350-x ↗
56. Effect of individualized cognitive and postural task difficulty levels on postural control during dual task condition10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.001 ↗
57. Cognitive tasks promote automatization of postural control in young and older adults10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.019 ↗
58. Continuous cognitive task promotes greater postural stability than an internal or external focus of attention10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.009 ↗