Modified Pseudo-Dynamic Bearing Capacity of Shallow Strip Foundation near Slope on Non-Uniform Soil
Source abstract
Abstract
In engineering practice, many foundations are forced to be placed on slopes, whose stability is deeply affected by seismic force. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations close to slopes is a crucial guide for engineering. Herein, an analytical procedure considering pseudo-dynamic influence is proposed, which offers a new assessment framework for seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations close to slopes on non-uniform soils. Considering the temporal and spatial characteristics of earthquake action, the seismic bearing capacity of foundations at different normalized frequencies is obtained, and depth profiles of seismic acceleration coefficients at different normalized frequencies are presented. The consistency between this paper’s computational results and the published literature substantiates the dependability of the proposed analytical procedure. The sensitivity analyses are carried out for horizontal seismic coefficients, normalized frequencies, damping ratios, internal friction angles, slope angles, cohesion, and non-uniform coefficients, and the results are presented for practice reference in engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Department of Civil & Architecture Engineering, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213028, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Upper-bound solutions for bearing capacity of foundations10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(59) ↗
2. Seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near rock slopes using the generalized Hoek-Brown criterion10.1002/nag.929 ↗
3. Seismic Bearing Capacity of Strip Foundation Embedded in c-ϕ Soil Slope10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001194 ↗
4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Strip Footings on Hoek–Brown Rock Slopes Using Adaptive Finite Element Limit Analysis10.1007/s00603-020-02334-6 ↗
5. Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings lying on Hoek–Brown slopes subjected to eccentric load10.1007/s11440-022-01587-5 ↗
6. Bearing Capacity of Foundations over Rock Slopes–Slip Lines and FELA Solutions10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9499 ↗
7. The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103 ↗
8. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall10.1007/s10706-005-1134-x ↗
9. Pseudo-dynamic active force and pressure behind battered retaining wall supporting inclined backfill10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.003 ↗
10. Pseudo-dynamic approach for active thrust of submerged soils10.1680/geng.10.00103 ↗
11. A New Pseudo-dynamic Approach for Seismic Active Soil Thrust10.1007/s10706-014-9734-y ↗
12. The primary influence of shear band evolution on the slope bearing capacity10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.021 ↗
13. Modified pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of reinforced soil foundations10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105901 ↗
14. Foundation bearing capacity estimation on unsaturated soil slope under transient flow condition using slip line method10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104804 ↗
15. Seismic bearing capacity factor Nγ for a rough strip footing on sloping ground10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105054 ↗
16. Effect of slope on bearing capacity of laterally loaded pile based on asymmetric failure mode10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104469 ↗
17. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:3(267) ↗
18. Upper-bound solutions for bearing capacity of strip footings over anisotropic nonhomogeneous clays
19. Limit analysis of the stability of slopes reinforced with piles against landslide in nonhomogeneous and anisotropic soils10.1139/T08-042 ↗
20. Three-dimensional stability analysis of anisotropic and non-homogeneous slopes using limit analysis10.1007/s11771-014-2047-8 ↗
21. Hou, C., Zhang, T., Sun, Z., Dias, D., and Shang, M. (2019). Seismic Analysis of Nonhomogeneous Slopes with Cracks Using a Discretization Kinematic Approach. Int. J. Geomech., 19.10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001487 ↗
22. Seismic Bearing Capacity of Strip Footings with Modified Pseudo-dynamic Method10.1007/s12205-024-2479-0 ↗
23. Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.03.002 ↗
24. Upper bound solutions for the shape factors of smooth rectangular footings on frictional materials10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103177 ↗
25. Seismic bearing capacity of rock foundations subjected to seepage by a unilateral piece-wise log-spiral failure mechanism10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105363 ↗
26. Three-dimensional stability of two-step slope with crack considering temperature effect on unsaturated soil
27. Seismic and static stability analysis for rock slopes by a kinematical approach10.1680/geot.2004.54.8.543 ↗
28. 3D seismic bearing capacity of rectangular foundations near rock slopes using upper bound method10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.091 ↗
29. Upper-bound limit load of rigid pavements resting on reinforced soil embankments—Kinematic approach10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100611 ↗
30. Seismic bearing capacity of a mounded foundation near a down-hill slope by pseudo-static analysis10.3208/sandf1972.34.11 ↗
31. Upper-bound solution for seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes10.1680/geot.2003.53.8.697 ↗
32. Seismic bearing capacity of strip footings adjacent to slopes using the upper bound limit analysis
33. Conventional vs. modified pseudo-dynamic seismic analyses in the shallow strip footing bearing capacity problem10.1007/s11803-021-2064-1 ↗
34. Estimation of the Seismic Bearing Capacity of Shallow Strip Footings Based on a Pseudodynamic Approach10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002459 ↗