Using the Newmark Sliding Block Method to Construct the Empirical Model of Permanent Displacement for Earthquake-Induced Landslides in China
Source abstract
Abstract
Earthquakes and the secondary hazards they trigger, such as landslides, collapses, and debris flows, profoundly reshape the land surface and cause significant casualties, property damage and ecological disruption. This study collected 312 strong ground motion records from 19 seismic events in China, with magnitudes ranging from Ms5.2 to Ms8.0. Using the Newmark sliding block method and programming, permanent displacements for earthquake-induced landslides with varying yield accelerations were calculated. Two models (Model 1 and Model 2) for predicting permanent displacements of earthquake-induced landslides were developed through multiple regression analysis. Results show that the goodness of fit (R2) for the permanent displacement (logu) in Model 1 and Model 2 is 0.866 and 0.923, respectively. Model 2 incorporates higher-order terms of yield acceleration ratio (ay/PGA), which effectively reduce nonlinearity in the residuals observed in Model 1 and enhance its accuracy. Finally, these models were compared with classical empirical models. Models 1 and 2, by calculating permanent displacement from ground motion data, provide critical insights into the mechanisms of earthquake-induced landslides, and play a key role in enhancing emergency response strategies for seismic geological hazards.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
Xi’an Center of China Geological Survey, Xi’an 710054, China
School of Human Settlement Environment and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 712000, China
Key Laboratory of Mine Geological Hazards Mechanism and Control, Xi’an 710054, China
Funding
the National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China10.1360/03dz0002 ↗
2. Spatiotemporal characteristics of earthquake hazard losses in mainland China during 1993–2017
3. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5 ↗
4. Review of earthquake damage losses in mainland China in 2015
5. Researches on the geo-hazards triggered by Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan
6. On the stability of fissured slopes subject to seismic action10.1002/nag.2498 ↗
7. Yan, Z.F., Deng, Y.H., He, J., Xuan, Y., and Wu, W. (2020). A Pseudodynamic Approach of Seismic Active Pressure on Retaining Walls Based on a Curved Rupture Surface. Math. Probl. Eng.10.1155/2020/6462034 ↗
8. Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark's sliding block analysis
9. Wieczorek, G.F., Wilson, R.C., and Harp, E.L. (2024, June 06). Map Showing Slope Stability During Earthquakes in San Mateo County, California (1257E). IMAP 1985, Issue, Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/i1257E.
10. Predicting earthquake-induced landslides, with emphasis on arid and semi-arid environments
11. Effects of Earthquakes on Dams and Embankments10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139 ↗
12. Franklin, A.G., and Chang, F.K. (1977). Earthquake Resistance of Earth and Rock-Fill Dams, Miscellaneous Paper.
13. Earthquake Induced Displacements of Sliding Blocks10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:1(44) ↗
14. Earthquake induced ground displacements10.1002/eqe.4290160704 ↗
15. Attenuation of earthquake-induced ground displacements10.1002/eqe.4290230502 ↗
16. Seismic stability of earth dams and embankments10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.743 ↗
17. Modified Newmark Model for Seismic Displacements of Compliant Slopes10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(635) ↗
18. A GLE-based model for seismic displacement analysis of slopes including strength degradation and geometry rearrangement10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.010 ↗
19. Seismic stability and displacement analyses of earth slopes using non-circular slip surface10.1016/j.sandf.2015.02.001 ↗
20. A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.004 ↗
21. The seismic displacement of a block sliding on an inclined plane with resistance varying with the distance moved10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.028 ↗
22. Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.006 ↗
23. Critical acceleration as a criterion in seismic landslide susceptibility assessment10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.011 ↗
24. Predictive model of Arias intensity and Newmark displacement for regional scale evaluation of earthquake-induced landslide hazard in Greece10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.009 ↗
25. Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(790) ↗
26. Probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps including epistemic uncertainty10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.001 ↗
27. A one-step Newmark displacement model for probabilistic seismic slope displacement hazard analysis10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.011 ↗
28. The analysis of seismic induced progressive instability and failure mechanisms: A case study10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105646 ↗
29. Co-seismic landslide hazard assessment of the 2017 Ms 6.9 Milin earthquake, Tibet, China, combining the logistic regression–information value and Newmark displacement models10.1007/s10064-022-02901-x ↗
30. Probabilistic assessment of seismically triggered landslide hazard for Uttarakhand (India) in the Western Himalayas10.1007/s11069-023-06023-9 ↗
31. Regional landslide susceptibility following the Mid NIIGATA prefecture earthquake in 2004 with NEWMARK’S sliding block analysis10.1007/s10346-017-0833-8 ↗
32. Landslides caused by earthquakes10.1130/0016-7606(1984)95<406:LCBE>2.0.CO;2 ↗
33. Prediction of seismic displacement of dry mountain slopes composed of a soft thin uniform layer10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.008 ↗
34. Arias, A. (1970). Arias, A. A Measure of Earthquake Intensity. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
35. Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.01.013 ↗
36. Jibson, R.W., Harp, E.L., and Michael, J.M. (1998). A Method for Producing Digital Probabilistic Seismic Landslide Hazard Maps: An Example from the Los Angeles, California Area, Open-File Report; US Geological Survey.10.3133/ofr98113 ↗
37. Predictive relationships for seismically induced slope displacements using numerical analysis results10.1007/s10518-015-9768-4 ↗
38. Effects of directionality and vertical component of ground motions on seismic slope displacements in Newmark sliding-block analysis10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.012 ↗