journal article·2025-04-10Open access

Significance in Numerical Simulation and Optimization Method Based on Multi-Indicator Sensitivity Analysis for Low Impact Development Practice Strategy

Qian Zhang, Mucheng Zhang, Wanjun Jiang, Yizhi Sheng, Yingwei Yuan, Meng Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of sponge city practices under actual conditions is essential for managing urban stormwater. Existing studies in urban stormwater management have rarely employed numerical simulations to model hydrological processes under actual Three-Dimensional (3D) conditions. In this study, a numerical computational model is developed to simulate the hydrological processes and reveal the temporal and spatial variation of runoff in relation to impervious surfaces and concave herbaceous fields. The applicability of the 3D modules was evaluated using the Chicago rain pattern formula under three recurrence periods: precipitation within one, five, and ten years. The results indicate that the thickness and slope of planting soil are the most sensitive factors regarding sponge city performance, with comprehensive factors of 0.754 and 0.461. The optimal structural parameters of the concave herbaceous field were obtained as follows: aquifer height, 200 mm; planting soil thickness, 600 mm; planting soil slope, 1.5%; planting soil porosity, 0.45; overflow pipeline porosity, 0.3. The flood peak reduction rate, delay rate, and total runoff control rate were the best in a recurrence period of 5a, with 88.93%, 51.11%, and 78.76%, respectively. This study offers technical and conformed methodological support for simulating water quantity processes in sponge cities, and for the control of waterlogging and the recycling of runoff.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Flood Risk Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Hydraulic Engineering, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China

Tianjin Agricultural University-China Agricultural University Joint Smart Water Conservancy Research Center, Tianjin 300384, China

Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China

State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. A framework to support decision making in the selection of sustainable drainage system design alternatives10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.034 ↗
2. An approach to the implementation of Low Impact Development measures towards an EcoCampus classification10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.085 ↗
3. A new framework for modeling decentralized low impact developments using Soil and Water Assessment Tool10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.005 ↗
4. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C., Kittle, J.L., Donigian, A.S., and Johanson, R.C. (2024, November 10). Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN. User’s Manual for Release 11. 1996, US EPA. Available online: https://hydrologicmodels.tamu.edu/hspf-user-manual/tutorials-and-manuals/.
5. Calibration and verification of SWMM for low impact development10.1111/jawr.12272 ↗
6. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2009). SUSTAIN-A Framework for Placement of Best Management Practices in Urban Watersheds to Protect Water Quality.
7. Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 ↗
8. Hydrologic modeling of Low Impact Development systems at the urban catchment scale10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050 ↗
9. An integrated framework to select resilient and sustainable sponge city design schemes for robust decision making10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106810 ↗
10. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development 110.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x ↗
11. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., and Williams, J.R. (2011). Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009, Texas Water Resources Institute.
12. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Low Impact Development Facilities Based on SUSTAIN Model
13. Qiu, S., Yin, H., Deng, J., and Li, M. (2020). Cost-effectiveness analysis of green–gray stormwater control measures for non-point source pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17030998 ↗
14. Scale dynamics of extensive green roofs: Quantifying the effect of drainage area and rainfall characteristics on observed and modeled green roof hydrologic performance10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.080 ↗
15. Modelling green roof stormwater response for different soil depths10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.007 ↗
16. Developing a hydrological simulation tool to design bioretention in a watershed10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.006 ↗
17. Sensitivity analysis of SWMM model LID facility parameters based on morris analysis
18. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 ↗
19. Evaluating Green Stormwater Infrastructure strategies efficiencies in a rapidly urbanizing catchment using SWMM-based TOPSIS10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.028 ↗
20. Hydrologic control criteria framework in the United States and its referential significance to China
21. Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters based on improved Morris method with the double-Latin hypercube sampling10.2166/nh.2023.109 ↗
22. Tianjin Urban and Rural Construction Commission (2016). Technical Guidelines for Sponge City Construction in Tianjin, Tianjin Construction Engineering Technology Research Institute.
23. The numerical computation of turbulent flows10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2 ↗
24. Effects of low impact development on the stormwater runoff and pollution control10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150404 ↗
25. An integrated framework for the comprehensive evaluation of low impact development strategies10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113023 ↗