Spectral Information Divergence-Driven Diffusion Networks for Hyperspectral Target Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Hyperspectral Imagery (HSI) plays a crucial role in military and civilian target detection. However, HSI target detection remains highly challenging due to the interference caused by complex and diverse real-world scenarios. This paper proposes a Spectral Information Divergence-driven Diffusion Network model (SID-DN) for hyperspectral target detection, which significantly enhances detection robustness in complex scenes by decoupling background distribution modeling from target detection. The proposed method focuses on learning the background distribution in hyperspectral data and achieves target detection by accurately reconstructing background samples to identify differences between background and target samples. This method introduces an adaptive coarse detection module, which optimizes the coarse detection process in generative hyperspectral target detection, effectively reducing the background-target misclassification. Additionally, a SID-based Diffusion model is designed to optimize the loss of Diffusion, effectively reducing the interference of suspected target samples during the background learning process. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that the method is highly competitive, with detection results significantly outperforming current state-of-the-art methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
School of Instrument Science and Optp-Electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Multimodal artificial intelligence foundation models: Unleashing the power of remote sensing big data in earth observation
2. Hyperspectral target detection: An overview of current and future challenges10.1109/MSP.2013.2278992 ↗
3. Conventional to deep ensemble methods for hyperspectral image classification: A comprehensive survey10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3353551 ↗
4. Low-rank and sparse representation inspired interpretable network for hyperspectral anomaly detection10.1109/TIM.2024.3405582 ↗
5. Chen, B., Liu, L., Zou, Z., and Shi, Z. (2023). Target detection in hyperspectral remote sensing image: Current status and challenges. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15133223 ↗
6. Cheng, G., Huang, Y., Li, X., Lyu, S., Xu, Z., Zhao, H., Zhao, Q., and Xiang, S. (2024). Change detection methods for remote sensing in the last decade: A comprehensive review. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16132355 ↗
7. Enhancing precision agriculture and land cover classification: A self-attention 3D convolutional neural network approach for hyperspectral image analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3420089 ↗
8. Challenges in remote sensing of vegetation phenology10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100070 ↗
9. A Joint Framework for Underwater Hyperspectral Image Restoration and Target Detection with Conditional Diffusion Model10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3464557 ↗
10. The use of hyperspectral remote sensing for mineral exploration: A review10.29150/jhrs.v7.4.p189-211 ↗
11. A Review of Hyperspectral Imaging Analysis Techniques for Onset Crop Disease Detection, Identification and Classification
12. The spectral image processing system (SIPS)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-N ↗
13. A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector10.1109/7.135446 ↗
14. Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d’Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00080-6 ↗
15. A signal-decomposed and interference-annihilated approach to hyperspectral target detection10.1109/TGRS.2003.821887 ↗
16. Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2113170 ↗
17. The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT10.1109/78.782198 ↗
18. An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis10.1109/18.857802 ↗
19. An automatic robust iteratively reweighted unstructured detector for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2320281 ↗
20. Adaptive subspace detectors10.1109/78.890324 ↗
21. Kernel adaptive subspace detector for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/LGRS.2006.869985 ↗
22. Hierarchical suppression method for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/TGRS.2015.2456957 ↗
23. Zhao, R., Shi, Z., Zou, Z., and Zhang, Z. (2019). Ensemble-based cascaded constrained energy minimization for hyperspectral target detection. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111310 ↗
24. Deep constrained energy minimization for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3205211 ↗
25. Invariant subpixel material detection in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2002.1000320 ↗
26. Decomposition model with background dictionary learning for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3049843 ↗
27. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach10.1109/36.298007 ↗
28. Orthogonal subspace projection using data sphering and low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/TGRS.2021.3053201 ↗
29. Combined sparse and collaborative representation for hyperspectral target detection10.1016/j.patcog.2015.05.024 ↗
30. Weighted Discriminative Collaborative Competitive Representation with Global Dictionary for Hyperspectral Target Detection
31. Background covariance discriminative dictionary learning for hyperspectral target detection
32. Shen, D., Ma, X., Wang, H., and Liu, J. (2022, January 17–22). A dual sparsity constrained approach for hyperspectral target detection. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2022—2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9884362 ↗
33. Convolutional neural network target detection in hyperspectral imaging for maritime surveillance10.1177/1729881419842991 ↗
34. Zhang, G., Zhao, S., Li, W., Du, Q., Ran, Q., and Tao, R. (2020). HTD-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12091489 ↗
35. Qin, H., Xie, W., Li, Y., and Du, Q. (2022, January 17–22). HTD-VIT: Spectral-spatial joint hyperspectral target detection with vision transformer. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2022—2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9884695 ↗
36. Jiao, J., Gong, Z., and Zhong, P. (2023). Dual-branch Fourier-mixing transformer network for hyperspectral target detection. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194675 ↗
37. An unsupervised momentum contrastive learning based transformer network for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3387985 ↗
38. Triplet spectralwise transformer network for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/TGRS.2023.3306084 ↗
39. Generative adversarial networks10.1145/3422622 ↗
40. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv.
41. Background learning based on target suppression constraint for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3024903 ↗
42. Deep latent spectral representation learning-based hyperspectral band selection for target detection10.1109/TGRS.2019.2952091 ↗
43. Hyperspectral target detection using self-supervised background learning10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.017 ↗
44. SRUN: Spectral Regularized Unsupervised Networks for Hyperspectral Target Detection10.1109/TGRS.2019.2947033 ↗
45. Hyperspectral target detection: Learning faithful background representations via orthogonal subspace-guided variational autoencoder10.1109/TGRS.2024.3393931 ↗
46. Hyperspectral target detection based on interpretable representation network10.1109/TGRS.2023.3302950 ↗
47. Discriminative feature learning with distance constrained stacked sparse autoencoder for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/LGRS.2019.2901019 ↗
48. Hyperspectral target detection with macro-micro feature extracted by 3-D residual autoencoder10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2939833 ↗
49. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models
50. Zeng, H., Cao, J., Zhang, K., Chen, Y., Luong, H., and Philips, W. (2024, January 16–22). Unmixing diffusion for self-supervised hyperspectral image denoising. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02628 ↗
51. Pang, L., Rui, X., Cui, L., Wang, H., Meng, D., and Cao, X. (2024, January 16–22). HIR-Diff: Unsupervised hyperspectral image restoration via improved diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00290 ↗
52. SpectralDiff: A generative framework for hyperspectral image classification with diffusion models
53. Ma, J., Xie, W., Li, Y., and Fang, L. (2023). Bsdm: Background suppression diffusion model for hyperspectral anomaly detection. arXiv.
54. Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm?
55. Ye, T., Dong, L., Xia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, Y., Huang, G., and Wei, F. (2024). Differential transformer. arXiv.
56. Hyperspectral anomaly detection with attribute and edge-preserving filters10.1109/TGRS.2017.2710145 ↗
57. An effective evaluation tool for hyperspectral target detection: 3D receiver operating characteristic curve analysis10.1109/TGRS.2020.3021671 ↗
58. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv.