journal article·2025-04-05Open access

Biomechanical Fuzzy Model for Analysing the Ergonomic Risk Level Associated with Upper Limb Movements

Martha Roselia Contreras-Valenzuela

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

This study proposes a decision support system that uses a fuzzy logic model to assess the risk level associated with repetitive upper limb movements during work tasks, which can lead to musculoskeletal disorders. The model considers three main sets: biomechanics, anthropometrics, and productivity. Standardised parameters were utilised to determine the risk level associated with movement. To validate the findings, a fuzzy model was applied to assess 123 female workers across three automatic high-speed production lines as a case study. The model quantifies the risks using 54 membership equations and incorporates nine linguistic variables organised into three sets: biomechanical: this includes applied force, moment force, and angle of the torso from vertical; anthropometric: this includes workers’ age and height and body mass index; and productivity: this includes working area depth, exposure time, and repetitiveness. The resulting fuzzy model, which is based on fuzzy set theory, utilises only four general fuzzy rules and allows for the evaluation of multiple workers simultaneously, providing a competitive advantage over models that rely on a large number of individual fuzzy rules to assess just one worker. The biomechanical set evaluates applied force and moment force based on productivity factors. Consequently, the behaviour of the group of 123 evaluations changed as the productivity risk value was introduced. For instance, in Test 1, which involves a low-risk task, we observed a biomechanical risk pattern that was solely related to the worker’s anthropometry. In Test 2, which presents a medium risk, the pattern of evaluations shifted, revealing behaviours that were more influenced by both anthropometric and biomechanical characteristics. Finally, in Test 3, the impact of anthropometry and biomechanics was clear in the risk assessment patterns, which aligned closely with the anthropometric. The DSS could help improve policies and work conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Autonomous University of Morelos State (UAEM), Avenida Universidad 1001, Colonia Chamilpa, Cuernavaca CP 62209, Morelos, Mexico

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Huston, R.L. (2013). Fundamentals of Biomechanics, Taylor and Francis.10.1201/b14767 ↗
2. Wrist Movements among Females in a Repetitive, Non-Forceful Work10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00042-5 ↗
3. Are Ergonomic Interventions Effective for Prevention of Upper Extremity Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Office Workers? A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102062 ↗
4. Pheasant, S. (2003). Bodyspace. Anthropometry, Ergonomics and Design of Work, Taylor & Francis. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781482272420 ↗
5. Analysis of Decision Support System for Determining Industrial Sub-District Using DEMATEL-MABAC Methods10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.162 ↗
6. Multi-Criteria Assessment Model on Environmental Ergonomics for Decision-Making in Schoolyards Based on Remote-Sensing and GIS Resources10.1016/j.scs.2023.104481 ↗
7. The Data Quality in a Complex Web Based Decision Support System10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.032 ↗
8. Fuzzy Logic-Based Decision Support System for Automating Ergonomics Risk Assessments10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103459 ↗
9. (2018). Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems—A Practical Guide for Small Organizations (Standard No. ISO 45001:2018).
10. (2018). Risk Management—Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 31000:2018).
11. Peckol, J.K. (2021). Introduction to Fuzzy Logic, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119772644 ↗
12. Cervical Musculoskeletal Disorders and Their Relationships with Personal and Work-Related Factors among Electronic Assembly Workers10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.018 ↗
13. Methods for Measuring Physical Workload among Commercial Cleaners: A Scoping Review10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103319 ↗
14. (2025, April 02). Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders & Ergonomics, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ergonomics/about/index.html.
15. Saatchi, R. (2024). Fuzzy Logic Concepts, Developments and Implementation. Information, 15.10.3390/info15100656 ↗
16. Klir, G.J., and Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall PTR. [1st ed.].
17. Applying Fuzzy-Set Theory to Performance Evaluation10.1016/S0038-0121(00)00004-5 ↗
18. Leger, D. (2017). Fundamentals of Biomechanics. Equilibrium, Motion and Deformation, Springer. [4th ed.].
19. A Biomechanical Model of a Vehicle Passenger in the Sagittal Plane10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26375 ↗
20. Field Measurement of Hand Forces of Palm Oil Harvesters and Evaluating the Risk of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) through Biomechanical Analysis10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103468 ↗
21. Chaffin, D.B., Andersson, G.B.J., and Martin, B.J. (2006). Occupational Biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons. [4th ed.].
22. (2024). Basic Human Body Measurements for Technological Design—Part 2: Statistical Summaries of Body Measurements from National Populations (Standard No. ISO/TR 7250-2:2024).
23. (2002). Safety of Machinery—Anthropometric Requirements for the Design of Workstations at Machinery (Standard No. ISO 14738:2002).
24. System for the Triaxial Measurement of Manual Force Exertions10.1016/0268-0033(93)90052-J ↗
25. Ergonomic Risk Assessment Based on Computer Vision and Machine Learning10.1016/j.cie.2020.106816 ↗
26. Gambatese, J., and Jin, Z. (2021). Identification and Assessment of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) Risk for Concrete Formwork Systems, CPWR.
27. Machine Learning Approach towards Real Time Assessment of Hand-Arm Vibration Risk10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.140 ↗
28. Post-COVID-19 Ergonomic School Furniture Design under Fuzzy Logic
29. Using Fuzzy Logic Approach to Predict Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Automotive Assembly Workers
30. Development of Driving Fatigue Strain Index Using Fuzzy Logic to Analyze Risk Levels of Driving Activity10.1002/tee.23002 ↗
31. Contreras-Valenzuela, M.R., Seuret-Jiménez, D., Hdz-Jasso, A.M., León Hernández, V.A., Abundes-Recilla, A.N., and Trutié-Carrero, E. (2022). Design of a Fuzzy Logic Evaluation to Determine the Ergonomic Risk Level of Manual Material Handling Tasks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19116511 ↗
32. A Fuzzy Relational Rule Network Modeling of Electromyographical Activity of Trunk Muscles in Manual Lifting Based on Trunk Angels, Moments, Pelvic Tilt and Rotation Angles10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.006 ↗
33. ENHANCING EFFICIENCY OF THE RULA BY INTERFERING WITH FUZZY LOGIC
34. A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Posture-Based Ergonomic Analysis for Field Observation and Assessment of Construction Manual Operations10.1139/cjce-2015-0143 ↗
35. Kamala, V., and Robert, T.P. (2022). FUZZY-LOGIC-BASED ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENT IN AN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng., 33.10.7166/33-4-2593 ↗
36. Patel, H., Patel, H.K., and Dinner, I. (2022). Fuzzy Logic Based Elbow Strength Prediction for Lateral Epicondylitis. Int. J. Health Sci., 4307–4313.10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6857 ↗
37. Liu, Y., Hu, W., Kasal, A., and Erdil, Y.Z. (2023). The State of the Art of Biomechanics Applied in Ergonomic Furniture Design. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212120 ↗
38. Three-Dimensional Biomechanical Static Strength Prediction Model Sensiticity to Postural and Anthropometric Inaccuracies10.1080/07408179108963856 ↗
39. (2007). Ergonomics Manual 68 Handling Part 3: Handling of Low Loads at High Frequency (Standard No. ISO 11228-3 (E)).
40. (2018). Factores de Riesgo Ergonómico En El Trabajo-Identificación, Análisis, Prevención y Control. Parte 1: Manejo Manual de Cargas (Standard No. NOM-036-1-STPS-2018).
41. National Institute of Health (2000). National Institute of Health Practical Guide to the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, NIH. [1st ed.].
42. Anatomical Data for Analyzing Human Motion
43. Neumann, D.A. (2017). Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System. Fundations for Rehabilitation, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
44. Winter, D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, John Wiley &Sons, Inc.. [4th ed.].10.1002/9780470549148 ↗