Reliability Analysis of Hybrid Laser INS Under Multi-Mode Failure Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The hybrid laser inertial navigation system (INS) is increasingly vital for high precision under high-dynamic, long-duration conditions, especially in complex aircraft environments. Key components like the base, platform, and inner/outer frames significantly impact system accuracy and stability through thseir static and dynamic characteristics. This study focuses on minimizing deviations in the INS body coordinate system caused by elastic deformation under high overload by developing a mechanical simulation model of a rotational modulation structure and a structural model of the outer frame assembly. A reliability analysis model is established, considering both functional and structural strength failures. To address uncertainties from manufacturing, technical conditions, material selection, and assembly errors, a global sensitivity analysis based on Bayesian inference evaluates parameter contributions to functional failure probability, using a sample size of N1 = 5 × 105. Additionally, uncertainty analysis via Sobol sequence sampling (N2 = 10,000) examines the impact of mean design parameter variations on failure probability for ZL107 and SiCp/Al aluminum matrix composite frames. Experimental verification concludes the study. The results indicate that the SiCp/Al composite material demonstrates superior mechanical performance compared to traditional materials such as the ZL107 aluminum alloy. The uncertainties in the inner frame thickness, inner frame material strength, and outer frame thickness have the most significant impact on the probability of functional failure in the hybrid INS, with sensitivity indices of δ6P{F} = 0.01657, δ2P{F} = 0.00873, and δ4P{F} = 0.00818, respectively. The mechanical properties of the outer frame structure made from SiCp/Al are significantly enhanced, with failure probabilities across three failure modes markedly lower than those of the ZL107 frame, indicating high reliability. In an impact test conducted on the product, the laser gyroscope worked normally, the hybrid laser system function was normal, and the platform angular velocity change corresponding to each impact direction was less than 12 ″/s. The maximum angle change of the inner and outer frames was 0.107°, indicating that the system structure can withstand large overloads and multiple levels of mechanical environments and has good environmental adaptability and reliability. This analytical approach provides a valuable method for reliability evaluation and design of new hybrid INS structures. More importantly, it provides insights into the influence of design parameter uncertainties on navigation accuracy, offering critical support for the advancement of inertial technology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi’an 710025, China
Xi’an Aerospace Precision Electromechanical Research Institute, Xi’an 710129, China
School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity, Xi’an 710012, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Reliability of MEMS inertial devices in mechanical and thermal environments: A review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27481 ↗
2. Time-variant harmonic model, modulated sliding discrete Fourier transform, and Kalman filter-based time–frequency domain fusion for fast self-calibration of the installation errors of rotational inertial navigation systems10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111573 ↗
3. Modeling and analysis of dynamic cone error in laser strapdown inertial navigation system
4. A high-precision positioning method for shield tunneling based on dual-axis hybrid inertial navigation system10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113915 ↗
5. IBRNet: Interpretable Belief Rule Network modeling method for fault diagnosis of redundant inertial navigation systems10.1016/j.conengprac.2023.105822 ↗
6. Temperature drift compensation of fiber strapdown inertial navigation system based on GSA-SVR10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111117 ↗
7. On hybrid inertial navigation systems
8. A compensation method of lever arm effect for tri-axis hybrid inertial navigation system based on fiber opticgyro10.1088/1361-6501/aa5afd ↗
9. Review and Prospect of Inertial Technology Development Process
10. Structural dynamics simulation analysis of integrated small inertial navigation platform system
11. New initial alignment method of carrier based inertial navigation system on swinging base
12. Ma, H., and Wu, J. (2012, January 11–13). Analysis of positioning errors caused by platform vibration of airborne LiDAR system. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Instrumentation and Control Technology, London, UK.10.1109/ISICT.2012.6291650 ↗
13. Research on the influence of platform angular vibration on inertial navigation system error under vibration conditions
14. Analysis of static and dynamic characteristics and structural optimization of inertial navigation external frame
15. Research on the application of high performance aluminum-lithium alloy in three-inertial group
16. Couvertier, M., Pacher, L., and Fradet, L. (2024). Does IMU redundancy improve multi-body optimization results to obtain lower-body kinematics? A preliminary study says no. J. Biomech., 168.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112091 ↗
17. Aluminium alloys as structural material: A review of research10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111372 ↗
18. Mechanical characterization of AA5083 aluminum alloy welded using resistance spot welding for the lightweight automobile body fabrication10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.646 ↗
19. A review of carbon nanotube is persion methods in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminium matrix composites manufacturing process
20. A review on fabrication methods, reinforcements and mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.042 ↗
21. Recent advances in aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphene-based nanomaterial: A critical review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100948 ↗
22. Smartphone-based Vision/MEMS-IMU/GNSS tightly coupled seamless positioning using factor graph optimization10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114420 ↗
23. Concurrent multi-scale design optimization of fiber-reinforced composite material based on an adaptive normal distribution fiber optimization scheme for minimum structural compliance and additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cma.2024.117596 ↗
24. Zhang, F., Qiao, Z., Tian, Y., Wu, M., and Xu, X. (2024). Reliability Analysis of Complex Structures Under Multi-Failure Mode Utilizing an Adaptive AdaBoost Algorithm. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210098 ↗
25. Reliability analysis of liquid rocket engines using adaptive kriging
26. Active Kriging-based conjugate first-order reliability method for highly efficient structural reliability analysis using resample strategy10.1016/j.cma.2024.116863 ↗
27. A new direct second-order reliability analysis method10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.026 ↗
28. Research on Monte Carlo simulation method for thick pinhole imaging10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113904 ↗
29. Design and optimization of a siphon turbine using the response surface methodology10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102241 ↗
30. A convolutional neural network-based proxy model for field production prediction and history matching10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205219 ↗
31. Expert’s experience-informed hierarchical kriging method for aerodynamic data modeling10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108490 ↗
32. Research on reliability and sensitivity of landing gear mechanism under multiple failure modes10.1051/jnwpu/20213910046 ↗
33. Meta IS-AK algorithm for solving global sensitivity of reliability
34. Performance analysis of two-stage thermoelectric generator model based on Latin hypercube sampling10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113159 ↗
35. Uncertainty analysis of photovoltaic cells to determine probability of functional failure10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120495 ↗