journal article·2025-03-28Open access

A Novel Assembly Process Knowledge Graph Inference Method Integrating Logical Rules and Embedded Learning

Peilin Shao, Zhicheng Huang, Yongqiang Wan, Lihong Qiao, Xinzheng Xu, Chao Chen, Zhujia Li, Nabil Anwer, Yifan Qie

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

The high complexity, repeatability, standardization, and quality requirements of the assembly process presently put forward raised requirements for the unified expression and organization of assembly process knowledge. As one of the core technologies supporting intelligent manufacturing, the construction of an assembly process knowledge graph (KG) becomes a viable method, the inference tasks of which include knowledge judgment, entity, and relation completion, all of which have also become research hotspots. However, most existing knowledge inference methods utilize the triplet form to express the KG, which cannot express all crucial information of assembly process KG construction, including entity, relation, entity type, attributes, etc. Therefore, a KG inference method integrating logical rules and embedded learning is proposed in this paper for KG inference tasks in KG construction. Comprehensively considering the semantic information of entity, relation, and entity type, an improved self-adversarial negative sampling method and logical rules are constructed, which are also introduced in the training process of existing embedded learning models. The proposed method could effectively solve the problems of incomplete assembly process KGs and low construction efficiency. Finally, based on three existing embedded learning models, including DistMult, ComplEx, and RotatE, this paper verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method relative to the above KG inference tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Industrial Technology and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

The Automated Production Research Laboratory (LURPA), Paris-Saclay University, ENS Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Nagy, L., Abonyi, J., and Ruppert, T. (2024). Knowledge Graph-Based Framework to Support Human-Centered Collaborative Manufacturing in Industry 5.0. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083398 ↗
2. Chen, X., Jia, S., and Xiang, Y. (2020). A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph. Expert Syst. Appl., 141.10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 ↗
3. Pujara, J., Miao, H., Getoor, L., and Cohen, W. (2013, January 21–25). Knowledge graph identification. Proceedings of the Semantic Web–ISWC 2013: 12th International Se-mantic Web Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Proceedings, Part I 12.
4. Shen, T., Zhang, F., and Cheng, J. (2022). A comprehensive overview of knowledge graph completion. Knowl.-Based Syst., 255.10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109597 ↗
5. Temporal link prediction based on dynamic heterogeneous information network
6. Relational retrieval using a combination of path-constrained random walks10.1007/s10994-010-5205-8 ↗
7. Galárraga, L.A., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., and Suchanek, F. (2013, January 13–17). AMIE: Association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1145/2488388.2488425 ↗
8. Gardner, M., and Mitchell, T. (2015, January 17–21). Efficient and expressive knowledge base completion using subgraph feature extraction. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal.10.18653/v1/D15-1173 ↗
9. Liu, Q., Jiang, L., Han, M., Liu, Y., and Qin, Z. (2016, January 17–21). Hierarchical random walk inference in knowledge graphs. Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy.10.1145/2911451.2911509 ↗
10. Bordes, A., Weston, J., Collobert, R., and Bengio, Y. (2011, January 7–11). Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7917 ↗
11. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., and Yakhnenko, O. (2013). Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 26.
12. Yu, M., Bai, C., Yu, J., Zhao, M., Xu, T., Liu, H., Li, X., and Yu, R. (2022). Translation-based embeddings with octonion for knowledge graph completion. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083935 ↗
13. Yang, B., Yih, W.T., He, X., Gao, J., and Deng, L. (2014). Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv.
14. Xiong, W., Hoang, T., and Wang, W.Y. (2017). DeepPath: A reinforcement learning method for knowledge graph reasoning. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D17-1060 ↗
15. Dettmers, T., Minervini, P., Stenetorp, P., and Riedel, S. (2018, January 2–7). Convolutional 2d knowledge graph embeddings. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11573 ↗
16. Neelakantan, A., Roth, B., and McCallum, A. (2015). Compositional vector space models for knowledge base completion. arXiv.10.3115/v1/P15-1016 ↗
17. Li, D., Lu, Y., Wu, J., Zhou, W., and Zeng, G. (2024). Causal Reinforcement Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062498 ↗
18. Gardner, M., Talukdar, P., Kisiel, B., and Mitchell, T. (2013, January 18–21). Improving learning and inference in a large knowledge-base using latent syntactic cues. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, WA, USA.10.18653/v1/D13-1080 ↗
19. Wei, Z., Zhao, J., Liu, K., Qi, Z., Sun, Z., and Tian, G. (2015, January 18–23). Large-scale knowledge base completion: Inferring via grounding network sampling over selected instances. Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.10.1145/2806416.2806513 ↗
20. Lan, Y., He, S., Liu, K., and Zhao, J. (2023). Knowledge reasoning via jointly modeling knowledge graphs and soft rules. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202308.1529.v1 ↗
21. Jing, Y., Zhou, G., Zhang, C., Chang, F., Yan, H., and Xiao, Z. (2024). XMKR: Explainable manufacturing knowledge recommendation for collaborative design with graph embedding learning. Adv. Eng. Inform., 59.10.1016/j.aei.2023.102339 ↗
22. Hao, J., Zhao, L., Milisavljevic-Syed, J., and Ming, Z. (2021). Integrating and navigating engineering design decision-related knowledge using decision knowledge graph. Adv. Eng. Inform., 50.10.1016/j.aei.2021.101366 ↗
23. Wang, R., and Cheung, C.F. (2023). Knowledge graph embedding learning system for defect diagnosis in additive manufacturing. Comput. Ind., 149.10.1016/j.compind.2023.103912 ↗
24. Bao, Q., Zheng, P., and Dai, S. (2024). Hierarchical construction and application of machining domain knowledge graph based on as-fabricated information model. Adv. Eng. Inform., 62.10.1016/j.aei.2024.102638 ↗
25. Zhou, Z.W., Ting, Y.H., Jong, W.R., and Chiu, M.C. (2022). Knowledge management for injection molding defects by a knowledge graph. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122311888 ↗
26. An ABGE-aided manufacturing knowledge graph construction approach for heterogeneous IIoT data integration10.1080/00207543.2022.2042416 ↗
27. Haruna, A., Yang, M., Jiang, P., and Ren, H. (2024). Collaborative task of entity and relation recognition for developing a knowledge graph to support knowledge reasoning for design for additive manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Inform., 60.10.1016/j.aei.2024.102364 ↗
28. Du, K., Yang, B., Wang, S., Chang, Y., Li, S., and Yi, G. (2022). Relation extraction for manufacturing knowledge graphs based on feature fusion of attention mechanism and graph convolution network. Knowl.-Based Syst., 255.10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109703 ↗
29. Jiang, S., Yang, J., Xie, J., Xu, X., Dou, Y., and Jing, L. (2024). Product innovation design approach driven by implicit relationship completion via patent knowledge graph. Adv. Eng. Inform., 61.10.1016/j.aei.2024.102530 ↗
30. Yang, B., Yuan, X., Ying, Z., Zhang, J., Song, B., Song, Y., Zhou, F., and Sheng, W. (2024). HOGN-TVGN: Human-inspired Embodied Object Goal Navigation based on Time-varying Knowledge Graph Inference Networks for Robots. Adv. Eng. Inform., 62.10.1016/j.aei.2024.102671 ↗