journal article·2025-03-27Open access

Rotor Location During Atrial Fibrillation: A Framework Based on Data Fusion and Information Quality

Miguel A. Becerra, Diego H. Peluffo-Ordoñez, Johana Vela, Cristian Mejía, Juan P. Ugarte, Catalina Tobón

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, is primarily sustained by rotor-type reentries, with their localization crucial for successful ablation treatment. Fractionated atrial electrogram (EGM) signals have been associated with the tips of the rotors and are thus considered as ablation targets. However, the typical noise problems of physiological signals affect the results of EGM processing tools, and consequently the ablation outcome. This study proposes a data fusion framework based on the Joint Directors of Laboratories model with six levels and information quality (IQ) assessment for locating rotor tips from EGMs simulated in a two-dimensional model of human atrial tissue under AF conditions. Validation tests were conducted using a set of 13 IQ criteria and their corresponding metrics. First, EGMs were contaminated with different types of noise and artifacts (power-line interference, spikes, loss of samples, and loss of resolution) to assess tolerance. The signals were then preprocessed, and five statistical features (sample entropy, approximate entropy, Shannon entropy, mean amplitude, and standard deviation) were extracted to generate rotor location maps using a wavelet fusion technique. Fuzzy inference was applied for situation and risk assessment, followed by IQ mapping using a support vector machine by level. Finally, the IQ criteria were optimized through a particle swarm optimization algorithm. The proposed framework outperformed existing EGM-based rotor detection methods, demonstrating superior functionality and performance compared to existing EGM-based rotor detection methods. It achieved an accuracy of approximately 90%, with improvements of up to 10% through tuning and adjustments based on IQ variables, aligned with higher-level system requirements. The novelty of this approach lies in evaluating the IQ across signal-processing stages and optimizing it through data fusion to enhance rotor tip position estimation. This advancement could help specialists make more informed decisions in EGM acquisition and treatment application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · ECG Monitoring and Analysis · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Ingeniería, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín 050034, Colombia

Modeling, Simulation and Data Analysis (MSDA) Research Program, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco

Smart Data Analysis Systems Group (SDAS), Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco

Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín 050013, Colombia

Grupo de Investigación en Modelado y Simulación Computacional (GIMSC), Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad de San Buenaventura, Medellín 051053, Colombia

Materiales Nanoestructurados y Biomodelación (MATBIOM), Universidad de Medellín, Medellín 050026, Colombia

Funding

Pascual Bravo University Institution

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119 ↗
2. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial10.1001/jama.2019.0693 ↗
3. Procedural findings and ablation outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation referred after two or more failed catheter ablations10.1111/jce.13329 ↗
4. Sample Entropy Analysis of Noisy Atrial Electrograms during Atrial Fibrillation
5. Rotors and Spiral Waves in Atrial Fibrillation10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03136.x ↗
6. Clinical Benefit of Ablating Localized Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.079 ↗
7. Initial independent outcomes from focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation for atrial fibrillation: Multicenter FIRM registry10.1111/jce.12474 ↗
8. Ablation of rotor and focal sources reduces late recurrence of atrial fibrillation compared with trigger ablation alone: Extended follow-up of the CONFIRM trial (conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation)10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.543 ↗
9. Rotors Detected by Phase Analysis of Filtered, Epicardial Atrial Fibrillation Electrograms Colocalize With Regions of Conduction Block10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005858 ↗
10. Ugarte, J.P., Orozco-Duque, A., N, C.T., Kremen, V., Novak, D., Saiz, J., Oesterlein, T., Schmitt, C., Luik, A., and Bustamante, J. (2014). Dynamic approximate entropy electroanatomic maps detect rotors in a simulated atrial fibrillation model. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0114577 ↗
11. Relationship between rotors and complex fractionated electrograms in atrial fibrillation using a novel computational analysis10.1016/j.repc.2017.02.012 ↗
12. Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by the Ablation of Localized Sources10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.022 ↗
13. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram mapping of atrial fibrillation substrate10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.11.002 ↗
14. Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms Improves Outcome in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation of Over 2 Years’ Duration10.4022/jafib.1607 ↗
15. Nicolet, J.J., Restrepo, J.F., and Schlotthauer, G. (2020). Classification of intracavitary electrograms in atrial fibrillation using information and complexity measures. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 57.10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101753 ↗
16. Reconstruction of Multi Spatial Resolution Feature Maps on a 2D Model of Atrial Fibrillation: Simulation Study10.1007/978-3-319-13117-7_159 ↗
17. Ugarte, J., Tobón, C., and Orozco-Duque, A. (2019). Entropy Mapping Approach for Functional Reentry Detection in Atrial Fibrillation: An In-Silico Study. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21020194 ↗
18. Finotti, E., Quesada, A., Ciaccio, E.J., Garan, H., Hornero, F., Alcaraz, R., and Rieta, J.J. (2022). Practical Considerations for the Application of Nonlinear Indices Characterizing the Atrial Substrate in Atrial Fibrillation. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24091261 ↗
19. The stationary wavelet transform as an efficient reductor of powerline interference for atrial bipolar electrograms in cardiac electrophysiology10.1088/1361-6579/ab2cb8 ↗
20. Vidmar, D., Alhusseini, M.I., Narayan, S.M., and Rappel, W.J. (2018). Characterizing Electrogram Signal Fidelity and the Effects of Signal Contamination on Mapping Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Front. Physiol., 9.10.3389/fphys.2018.01232 ↗
21. Novel mapping techniques for rotor core detection using simulated intracardiac electrograms10.1111/jce.14948 ↗
22. The pathophysiologic basis of fractionated and complex electrograms and the impact of recording techniques on their detection and interpretation10.1161/CIRCEP.109.904763 ↗
23. Optimal electrogram voltage recording technique for detecting the acute ablative tissue injury in the human right atrium10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00803.x ↗
24. Influence of High-Pass Filtering on Noncontact Mapping and Ablation of Atrial Tachycardias10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00383.x ↗
25. The Impact of Filter Settings on Morphology of Unipolar Fibrillation Potentials10.1007/s12265-020-10011-w ↗
26. Signals and signal processing for the electrophysiologist: Part I: Electrogram acquisition10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964304 ↗
27. White, F.E. (1988, January 4–6). A model for data fusion. Proceedings of the 1st National Symposium on Sensor Fusion, Orlando, FL, USA.
28. Steinberg, A.N., Bowman, C.L., and White, F.E. (1998, January 17–19). Revisions to the JDL Data Fusion Model. Proceedings of the A1AA Missile Sciences Conference, Monterey, CA, USA.10.21236/ADA389851 ↗
29. Data fusion for ITS: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.016 ↗
30. Rojas, I., and Ortuño, F. (2018). Low Data Fusion Framework Oriented to Information Quality for BCI Systems. Proceedings of the Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, IWBBIO 2018, Granada, Spain, 25–27 April 2018, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7 ↗
31. Becerra, M.A., Tobón, C., Castro-Ospina, A.E., and Peluffo-Ordóñez, D.H. (2021). Information Quality Assessment for Data Fusion Systems. Data, 6.10.3390/data6060060 ↗
32. Synnergren, J., Gamalielsson, J., and Olsson, B. (2007, January 7–10). Mapping of the JDL data fusion model to bioinformatics. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4414074 ↗
33. Information fusion and information quality assessment for environmental forecasting10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100960 ↗
34. Evolution of the JDL Model
35. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: Insights from a mathematical model10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.1.H301 ↗
36. Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00178-9 ↗
37. Molecular Basis of Downregulation of G-Protein–Coupled Inward Rectifying K + Current (I K,ACh) in Chronic Human Atrial Fibrillation10.1161/hc4601.099466 ↗
38. The contribution of ionic currents to changes in refractoriness of human atrial myocytes associated with chronic atrial fibrillation10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00380-7 ↗
39. Fourier spectral methods for fractional-in-space reaction-diffusion equations10.1007/s10543-014-0484-2 ↗
40. Ferrero, J.M. (1994). Bioelectrónica. Señales Bioeléctricas, Univerisidad Politécnica de Valencia. [1st ed.].
41. Different characteristics of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in acute paroxysmal versus long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.018 ↗
42. Comparative study of approximate entropy and sample entropy robustness to spikes10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.007 ↗
43. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297 ↗
44. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039 ↗
45. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95 -International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia.
46. Yu, C., and Chen, J. (2020). Landslide susceptibility mapping using the slope unit for southeastern Helong city, Jilin province, China: A comparison of ANN and SVM. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12061047 ↗
47. Kononenko, I. (1994, January 6–8). Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. Proceedings of the Machine Learning: ECML-94, Catania, Italy.10.1007/3-540-57868-4_57 ↗
48. Locating Atrial Fibrillation Rotor and Focal Sources Using Iterative Navigation of Multipole Diagnostic Catheters10.1007/s13239-019-00414-5 ↗
49. Rodrigo, M., Alhusseini, M.I., Rogers, A.J., Krittanawong, C., Thakur, S., Feng, R., Ganesan, P., and Narayan, S.M. (2022). Atrial fibrillation signatures on intracardiac electrograms identified by deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med., 145.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105451 ↗
50. Liaqat, S., Dashtipour, K., Zahid, A., Assaleh, K., Arshad, K., and Ramzan, N. (2020). Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Machine Learning Approach. Information, 11.10.3390/info11120549 ↗
51. Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods-centric overview with concrete examples10.1002/widm.1493 ↗
52. Unsupervised Classification of Atrial Electrograms for Electroanatomic Mapping of Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation10.1109/TBME.2020.3021480 ↗
53. Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Anchored Reentry Substrate Created by Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Computational Models10.1161/JAHA.123.030500 ↗
54. Ma, Y., Zhang, D., Xu, J., Pang, H., Hu, M., Li, J., Zhou, S., Guo, L., and Yi, F. (2023). Explainable machine learning model reveals its decision-making process in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation at high risk for recurrence after catheter ablation. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord., 23.10.1186/s12872-023-03087-0 ↗
55. Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density functions