Comparative Evaluation and Optimization of Neural Networks for Epileptic Magnetoencephalogram Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the classification performance of feed-forward neural networks (FFNNs) and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) on magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals from epileptic patients. MEG signals were recorded using the NEUROMAG-122 whole-brain superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), installed, and operated in our laboratory. The dataset comprised over 5000 MEG segments, each one with a duration of 1 s and sampled at a frequency of 256 Hz. Each segment was classified by expert neurologists as either epileptic or non-epileptic. The FFNN with five hidden layers demonstrated promising results, achieving a classification accuracy of approximately 92%. The 1D-CNN, utilizing four layers, achieved an accuracy of 90.4%, with a significantly reduced training time. Building on these findings, the study’s secondary objective was to enhance the artificial neural network (ANN) model by incorporating transfer learning–stacked generalization for FFNN in various configurations. These enhancements successfully improved the performance of the pretrained network by approximately 1%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural Networks and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Medical Physics Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Sidiropoulou, K. (2015). Basic Principles of the Nervous System Functioning, National Technological University of Athens.
2. NIH (2023, June 10). Health Information, NIH, Available online: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/epilepsy-and-seizures.
3. Boonyakitanont, P., Lek-Uthai, A., Chomtho, K., and Songsiri, J. (2019). A review of feature extraction and performance evaluation in epileptic seizure detection using EEG. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 57, Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.00492.pdf.10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101702 ↗
4. Gao, Y., Gao, B., Chen, Q., Liu, J., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Epileptic Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signal Classification. Front. Neurol., 11, Available online: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.00375/full.10.3389/fneur.2020.00375 ↗
5. Gómez, C., Arbeláez, P., Navarrete, M., Alvarado-Rojas, C., Le Van Quyen, M., and Valderrama, M. (2020). Automatic seizure detection based on imaged-EEG signals through fully convolutional networks. Sci. Rep., 10.10.1038/s41598-020-78784-3 ↗
6. Multimodal detection of epilepsy with deep neural networks, Expert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119010 ↗
7. Ensemble Classifier Framework for Epileptic Seizure Classification of EEG Signals
8. EEG signal classification using PSO trained RBF neural network for epilepsy identification10.1016/j.imu.2016.12.001 ↗
9. Aoe, J., Fukuma, R., Yanagisawa, T., Harada, T., Tanaka, M., Kobayashi, M., Inoue, Y., Yamamoto, S., Ohnishi, Y., and Kishima, H. (2019). Automatic diagnosis of neurological diseases using MEG signals with a deep neural network. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-019-41500-x ↗
10. Epileptic MEG Spike Detection Using Statistical Features and Genetic Programming with KNN10.1155/2017/3035606 ↗
11. EEG based multi-class seizure type classification using convolutional neural network and transfer learning10.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.017 ↗
12. Semi-dilated convolutional neural networks for epileptic seizure prediction10.1016/j.neunet.2021.03.008 ↗
13. Fully-Automated Spike Detection and Dipole Analysis of Epileptic MEG Using Deep Learning10.1109/TMI.2022.3173743 ↗
14. Li, J., Pan, J., Wang, F., and Yu, Z. (2021). Inter-Subject MEG Decoding for Visual Information with Hybrid Gated Recurrent Network. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031215 ↗
15. Late combination shows that MEG adds to MRI in classifying MCI versus controls10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119054 ↗
16. Olivetti, E., Mostafa Kia, S., and Avesani, P. (2014). MEG Decoding Across Subjects, University of Trento.10.1109/PRNI.2014.6858538 ↗
17. Zhou, Z.-H. (2012). Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, Chapman & Hall/CRC. Google Books.10.1201/b12207 ↗
18. A survey on ensemble learning10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z ↗
19. Hansen, P., Kringelbach, M., and Salmelin, R. (2010). MEG An Introduction to Methods, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307238.001.0001 ↗
20. Kim, T., Nguyen, P., Pham, N., Bui, N., Truong, H., Ha, S., and Vu, T. (2020). Epileptic Seizure Detection and Experimental Treatment: A Review. Front. Neurol., 11.10.3389/fneur.2020.00701 ↗
21. Toward a definition of MEG spike: Parametric description of spikes recorded simultaneously by MEG and depth electrodes10.1016/j.seizure.2009.07.002 ↗
22. Magnetoencephalography Is More Successful for Screening and Localizing Frontal Lobe Epilepsy than Electroencephalography10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01223.x ↗
23. Epileptic MEG Spikes Detection Using Amplitude Thresholding and Dynamic Time Warping10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2718044 ↗
24. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 ↗
25. Spatiotemporal stationarity of epileptic focal activity evaluated by analyzing magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data and the theoretical implications
26. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain10.1002/ana.410280613 ↗
27. Magnetic Stimulation Can Modulate Seizures in Epileptic Patients10.1023/A:1025610516767 ↗
28. Sazli, M. (2006). A Brief Review of Feed-Forward Neural Networks, Ankara University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electronics Engineering.10.1501/0003168 ↗
29. 1D Convolutional Networks and Applications: A survey10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 ↗
30. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
31. Mathworks (2025, March 20). MATLAB Documentation on Feedforwardnet. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/nnet/ref/feedforwardnet.html.
32. Mathworks (2025, March 20). MATLAB Documentation on Trainnet. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ref/trainnet.html.
33. Anthony, M., and Bartlett, P. (1999). Neural Network Learning: Theoretical Foundations, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624216 ↗
34. Mertens, S., and Engel, A. (1996). On the VC-Dimension of Neural Networks with Binary Weights, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Otto-von-Guericke Universitat.
35. Stacked generalization10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1 ↗
36. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
37. Issues in stacked generalization10.1613/jair.594 ↗
38. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T ↗
39. Neural network ensembles10.1109/34.58871 ↗
40. The strength of weak learnability10.1007/BF00116037 ↗
41. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision10.1007/s00769-006-0191-z ↗