journal article·2025-03-22Open access

Collapse Potential of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridge Structure

Zeynep Yılmaz, Murat Serdar Kirçil

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study conducted to obtain the fragility curves of an existing reinforced concrete highway bridge in Kocaeli, Turkey, to investigate the collapse potential. Bridges are key components of transportation systems, providing convenient and efficient access to different locations. However, these structures are susceptible to forces that can cause significant damage in the event of seismic activity. Thus, the fundamental target of designing earthquake-resistant bridges is to ensure that they can remain functional at an acceptable level during seismic activity. At least, they are expected to survive strong earthquakes without collapse. Turkey is a country located on active fault lines and has experienced devastating earthquakes in the past. This high earthquake risk requires the design and construction of bridges that are a critical part of the transportation infrastructure having adequate safety levels so that the collapse risk can be minimized. Therefore, damage estimation of bridges is an important part of earthquake preparedness and the response plans that will be followed immediately after earthquakes. In this study, the fragility curves of an existing reinforced concrete highway were obtained to investigate the collapse potential. The interstory drift limits related to the performance levels defined by the Turkish Bridge Seismic Design Code 2020 were determined by the incremental dynamic analysis method, and fragility curves were obtained using 10 different earthquake records based on these determined limits. The results showed that the target performance level Uninterrupted Occupancy and Collapse Prevention performance level requirements, as defined by the Turkish Bridge Seismic Design, were not met, and the Collapse Probability is %100.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler 34220, Turkey

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Bridge Earthquake Design Code of Turkey (2020). Specifications for Design and Assessment of Bridges, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
2. AASHTO (2012). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287) ↗
4. Statistical Analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge10.1193/1.1586027 ↗
5. (1985). Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California (Standard No. ATC-13).
6. Yu, O., Allen, D.L., and Drnevich, V.P. (1991, January 22–23). Seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges on earthquake priority routes in Western Kentucky. Proceedings of the Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
7. Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322) ↗
8. A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges10.1002/eqe.291 ↗
9. Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges10.12989/sem.2004.17.2.215 ↗
10. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone10.1007/BF02841989 ↗
11. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006 ↗
12. Analytical fragility curves for ordinary highway bridges in Turkey10.1193/1.3651349 ↗
13. Experimental investigation and seismic vulnerability assessment of low flexural strength rectangular bridge piers retrofitted with ultra-high performance concrete jackets
14. Probabilistic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of a seismic resistance bridge system with post-tensioning precast segmental ultra-high performance concrete bridge columns10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111321 ↗
15. Seismic performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concrete bridges under near-fault and far-field ground motions10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.049 ↗
16. Effects of Deck-Abutment Pounding on the Seismic Fragility Curves of Box-Girder Highway Bridges10.1080/13632469.2023.2283004 ↗
17. Furinghetti, M., Reale, S., Fox, M.J., and Pavese, A. (2023). Numerical Assessment of the Seismic Vulnerability of Bridges within the Italian Road Network. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148194 ↗
18. Seismic resilience assessment of bridges considering both maximum and residual displacements10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116420 ↗
19. Uenaga, T., Omidian, P., George, R.C., Mirzajani, M., and Khaji, N. (2023). Seismic Resilience Assessment of Curved Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers through Seismic Fragility Curves Considering Short- and Long-Period Earthquakes. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15107764 ↗
20. Energy based seismic vulnerability assessment tool for reinforced concrete bridges10.1007/s10518-024-01969-y ↗
21. Probabilistic seismic assessment of multispan RC highway bridges considering soil-structure interaction and chloride-induced corrosion10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117257 ↗
22. Seismic Resilience Assessment of the Hybrid Bridge Pier Based on Fragility Analysis10.1007/s13296-024-00818-7 ↗
23. System-level performance of earthquake-damaged concrete bridges with repaired columns
24. Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Under Coupled Horizontal and Vertical Ground Motions Using Fragility Surfaces10.1080/13632469.2024.2308612 ↗
25. Wilson, E.L., and Habibullah, A. (1997). SAP2000 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures (Version 10), Computers and Structures Inc.
26. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
27. Mangalathu, S. (2017). Performance Based Grouping And Fragility Analysis of Box-Girder Bridges in California. [Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology].
28. Effect of Abutment Modeling on the Seismic Response of Bridge Structures10.1007/s11803-008-1008-3 ↗
29. Megally, S.H., Silva, P.F., and Seible, F. (2002). Seismic Response of Sacrificial Shear Keys in Bridge Abutments, University of California. Technical Report SSRP–2001/23.
30. Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2003). Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center-University of California. PEER Report 2003/16.
31. Kinematic response functions and dynamic stifnesses of bridge embankments10.1002/eqe.196 ↗
32. Mikes, I.G., and Kappos, A.J. (2021, January 28–30). Simple and complex modelling of seat-type abutment-backfill systems. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece.10.7712/120121.8864.19520 ↗
33. Bridge abutments: Assessing their influence on earthquake response of Meloland Road Overpass10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:8(1838) ↗
34. CALTRANS (2013). Seismic Design Criteria, version 1.7, California Department of Transportation.
35. Bozorgzadeh, A. (2007). Effect of Structure Backfill on Stiffness and Capacity of Bridge Abutments. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of California].10.1061/40975(318)168 ↗
36. (2023, June 15). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER” Ground Motion Database. Available online: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
37. Boore, D.M., and Atkinson, G.M. (2016). Seismomatch 2016 Earthquake Software for Response Spectrum Matching, Seismosoft Ltd.
38. Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges10.1002/eqe.2396 ↗
39. Incremental Dynamic Analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
40. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026 ↗