Examination of the Bond Strength of Retrograde Filling in Teeth with Failed Apical Resection After Retreatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The primary purpose of the study is to investigate the bond strength of apical fillings following retreatment in teeth with failed apical resection. Methods: After the preparation and obturation of the 120 human upper central and canine teeth, apical 3 mm was resected and separated into two main groups to prepare retrograde cavities using tungsten carbide burs or ultrasonic retro-tips. Each main group was separated into three subgroups according to retrograde filling material (Glass ionomer cement, MTA and Biodentine), and each subgroup was divided according to placement technique: manual condensation and indirect ultrasonic vibration. After the retrograde filling, retreatment procedures were performed, and 2 mm sections were removed from the apical filling and analyzed for push-out test. A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check the normal distribution of the data while Levene’s test was used to check the homogenity of group variances. The data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA. Results: The analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between cavities prepared with tungsten carbide and ultrasonic retro tips in push-out bond strength. Conclusions: There was no effect on the bond strength of the retrograde filling material and the placement technique of the material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Trauma and Treatments · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Salt Dental Clinic, 34944 Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, 52200 Ordu, Turkey
Funding
Ordu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery10.1259/dmfr.20170210 ↗
2. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: A review10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010 ↗
3. Tissue response to potential root-end filling materials in infected root canals10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00682.x ↗
4. The Effect of Root End Cavity Preparation Using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Ultrasonic Retrotip, and Bur on the Apical Microleakage of Retrograde Cavity Filled with MTA Plus10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_90_20 ↗
5. Erbium:YAG laser versus ultrasonic in preparation of root-end cavities10.1097/01.don.0000158234.33581.e9 ↗
6. Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery10.1097/00004770-200205000-00008 ↗
7. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80271-2 ↗
8. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, bioaggregate and biodentine10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1539 ↗
9. Calcium silicate bioactive cements: Biological perspectives and clinical applications10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.004 ↗
10. Light-cured glass ionomer cement as a retrograde root seal10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00562.x ↗
11. The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00187.x ↗
12. Treatment outcome in endodontics: The Toronto study—phases 3 and 4: Orthograde retreatment10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.003 ↗
13. Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: A systematic review of the literature10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01484.x ↗
14. Dioguardi, M., Stellacci, C., La Femina, L., Spirito, F., Sovereto, D., Laneve, E., Manfredonia, M.F., D’Alessandro, A., Ballini, A., and Cantore, S. (2022). Comparison of Endodontic Failures between Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicina, 58.10.3390/medicina58070894 ↗
15. Outcome of orthograde retreatment after failed apicoectomy: Use of a mineral trioxide aggregate apical plug10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.002 ↗
16. Non-surgical retreatment of a failed apicoectomy without retrofilling using white mineral trioxide aggregate as an apical barrier10.1590/S0103-64402012000200013 ↗
17. Push-out Bond Strength of Root-end Filling Materials10.1590/0103-6440201600340 ↗
18. Root-end resection with or without retrograde obturation after orthograde filling with two techniques: A micro-CT study10.1111/aej.12634 ↗
19. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of three retrograde filling materials in teeth with root apices resected at 90 degrees: Mineral trioxide aggregate Angelus, Zirconomer, and Bioactive bone cement10.4103/jcd.jcd_268_22 ↗
20. Parashos, P., Phoon, A., and Sathorn, C. (2014). Effect of ultrasonication on physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomed. Res. Int., 2014.10.1155/2014/191984 ↗
21. An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.020 ↗
22. Push-out bond strength of three different calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials after ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation10.1007/s00784-017-2244-6 ↗
23. Apical dentin permeability and microleakage associated with root end resection and retrograde filling10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80022-1 ↗
24. Marginal adaptation10.1016/0300-5712(93)90104-X ↗
25. Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00676.x ↗
26. Leakage of amalgam and Super-EBA root-end fillings using two preparation techniques and surgical microscopy10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81099-X ↗
27. Endodontic surgery failure: SEM analysis of root-end filling10.2334/josnusd.53.393 ↗
28. Evaluation of apical cavity preparation with a new type of ultrasonic diamond tip10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.019 ↗
29. Volume of Voids in Retrograde Filling: Comparison between Calcium Silicate Cement Alone and Combined with a Calcium Silicate-based Sealer10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.015 ↗
30. Biocompatibility and biomineralization assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate flow10.1007/s00784-018-2423-0 ↗
31. Push-out bond strength of MTA with antiwashout gel or resins10.1111/iej.12169 ↗
32. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair10.4103/0972-0707.117504 ↗
33. Push-out bond strength of different mineral trioxide aggregates10.4103/1305-7456.137646 ↗
34. Effect of ultrasonic tip and root-end filling material on bond strength10.1007/s00784-015-1708-9 ↗
35. Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin
36. Push-out bond strength of two root-end filling materials in root-end cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser or ultrasonic technique10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00264.x ↗
37. The push-out bond strength of BIOfactor mineral trioxide aggregate, a novel root repair material10.5395/rde.2019.44.e5 ↗
38. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.007 ↗
39. Berman, L.H. (2021). Nonsurgical retreatment. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp, Elsevier. [12th ed.].
40. Effect of cleaning protocols on bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin10.4103/JCD.JCD_112_18 ↗
41. Effects of blood contamination on the shear bond strengths of conventional and hydrophilic primers10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.022 ↗
42. Success rate of orthograde endodontic retreatment after failed apicectomy—A retrospective study10.1111/iej.13925 ↗