journal article·2025-03-18Open access

Signal Separation Based on Knowledge Representation

Cai Lu, Xuyang Zou, Jingjing Zong

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

The separation of mixed signals typically requires appropriate prior assumptions, while traditional signal separation methods struggle to describe the differences in separation targets with significant features. This paper proposes a signal separation framework based on knowledge representation, where separation targets are represented with knowledge, guiding the branches of autoencoders for signal separation. Firstly, under the proposed knowledge representation framework, corresponding knowledge representations are obtained based on observed mixed signals. Secondly, the number of branches of the autoencoder is determined based on the number of separation target signals. Then, utilizing the results of knowledge representation, a branch autoencoder network is constructed, with branches guided by knowledge to achieve the separation of target sub-signals. Finally, a self-encoding network architecture is constructed with a combination of observation signal reconstruction error and knowledge-guided error constraints. Through numerical simulations on a layered velocity model, the Marmousi-II geological model, and the MNIST dataset, the proposed method is validated by comparing the numerical energy differences between predictions and ground truths, demonstrating its effectiveness under both limited and ample data conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Blind Source Separation Techniques · Neural Networks and Applications · Speech and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo, X., Cao, X., and Ma, Y. (2014, January 23–28). Robust separation of reflection from multiple images. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.281 ↗
2. Narayanaswamy, V., Thiagarajan, J.J., Anirudh, R., and Spanias, A. (2020). Unsupervised audio source separation using generative priors. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2020-3115 ↗
3. A review of blind source separation methods: Two converging routes to ILRMA originating from ICA and NMF10.1017/ATSIP.2019.5 ↗
4. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization10.1038/44565 ↗
5. Blind audio source separation with minimum-volume beta-divergence NMF10.1109/TSP.2020.2991801 ↗
6. Multimodal soft nonnegative matrix co-factorization for convolutive source separation10.1109/TSP.2017.2679692 ↗
7. Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 ↗
8. Assessment of the capabilities of the temporal and spatiotemporal ICA method for geophysical signal separation in GRACE data10.1002/2013JB010452 ↗
9. Implementation of fast ICA using memristor crossbar arrays for blind image source separations10.1049/iet-cds.2019.0420 ↗
10. Source separation and localization using time-frequency distributions: An overview10.1109/MSP.2013.2265315 ↗
11. High-efficiency and precision VSP wavefield separation method via DCT10.1093/jge/gxac010 ↗
12. Vertical seismic profiling10.1190/1.1487141 ↗
13. A plane-wave decomposition for elastic wave fields applied to the separation of P-waves and S-waves in vector seismic data10.1190/1.1442102 ↗
14. Frequency-wavenumber implementation for P-and S-wave separation from multi-component seismic data10.1071/EG14047 ↗
15. Separation of P–P and P–SV wavefields by high resolution parabolic Radon transform10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.05.011 ↗
16. Radon transform wave field separation for vertical seismic profiling data10.1190/1.1442151 ↗
17. Deep learning-based P-and S-wave separation for multicomponent vertical seismic profiling10.1109/TGRS.2020.3039534 ↗
18. P/S-wave separation of multicomponent seismic data at the land surface based on deep learning10.1190/geo2022-0282.1 ↗
19. Unsupervised sound separation using mixture invariant training
20. Neri, J., Badeau, R., and Depalle, P. (2021, January 23–27). Unsupervised blind source separation with variational auto-encoders. Proceedings of the 2021 29th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Dublin, Ireland.10.23919/EUSIPCO54536.2021.9616154 ↗
21. Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation10.1073/pnas.1922210117 ↗
22. Wang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., and Yan, J. (2017, January 19–25). Combining Knowledge with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Short Text Classification. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-17), Melbourne, Australia.10.24963/ijcai.2017/406 ↗
23. Wang, X., He, X., Cao, Y., Liu, M., and Chua, T.S. (2019, January 4–8). Kgat: Knowledge graph attention network for recommendation. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330989 ↗
24. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
25. Muralidhar, N., Islam, M.R., Marwah, M., Karpatne, A., and Ramakrishnan, N. (2018, January 10–13). Incorporating prior domain knowledge into deep neural networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/BigData.2018.8621955 ↗
26. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
27. Informed machine learning–a taxonomy and survey of integrating prior knowledge into learning systems
28. Sensing prior constraints in deep neural networks for solving exploration geophysical problems10.1073/pnas.2219573120 ↗
29. P-and S-Wave Separation in Complex Geological Structures via Knowledge-Guided Autoencoder10.1109/TGRS.2024.3494868 ↗
30. Sun, H., Zhang, J., Xue, Y., and Zhao, X. (2024). Seismic inversion based on fusion neural network for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance and porosity. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 62.10.1109/TGRS.2024.3426563 ↗
31. Lu, C., and Zhang, C. (2023). Seismic velocity inversion via physical embedding recurrent neural networks (RNN). Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132413312 ↗
32. Elastic isotropic and anisotropic full-waveform inversions using automatic differentiation for gradient calculations in a framework of recurrent neural networks10.1190/geo2020-0542.1 ↗
33. Blind signal separation: Statistical principles10.1109/5.720250 ↗
34. Blind separation of sources, part I: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture10.1016/0165-1684(91)90079-X ↗
35. The P-and S-Wave Decomposition in a Multicomponent Elastic Wavefield Based on the Divergence and Curl Operators and Their Applications in Elastic Reverse Time Migration
36. Local vertical seismic profiling (VSP) elastic reverse-time migration and migration resolution: Salt-flank imaging with transmitted P-to-S waves10.1190/1.3309460 ↗
37. Unsupervised VSP Up-and Downgoing Wavefield Separation via Dual Convolutional Autoencoders10.1109/TGRS.2024.3494868 ↗
38. Aki, K., and Richards, P.G. (2002). Quantitative Seismology, University Science Books.
39. Jianlei, Z., Zhenping, T., and Chengxiang, W. (2007, January 23–26). P-and S-wave separated elastic wave equation numerical modeling using 2D staggered-grid. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, San Antonio, TX, USA. SEG–2007–2104.10.1190/1.2792904 ↗
40. Marmousi2: An elastic upgrade for Marmousi10.1190/1.2172306 ↗
41. Zhang, T., Innanen, K.A., Sun, J., and Trad, D.O. (2020, January 11–16). Numerical analysis of a deep learning formulation of multi-parameter elastic full waveform inversion. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Virtual. D031S057R004.
42. Richardson, A. (2018). Seismic full-waveform inversion using deep learning tools and techniques. arXiv.
43. A theory-guided deep-learning formulation and optimization of seismic waveform inversion10.1190/geo2019-0138.1 ↗